Cargando…
Taking sides. Clashing views on controversial issues in American foreign policy /
This debate-style reader is designed to introduce students to controversies in American foreign policy. The readings, which represent the arguments of leading political scientists and researchers, reflect a variety of viewpoint and have been selected for their liveliness and substance and because of...
Otros Autores: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Libro |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Guilford, Conn. :
Dushkin/McGraw-Hill,
c2000.
|
Materias: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a22000002a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocm43944085 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20141204195203.0 | ||
008 | 041111s2000 ctu 000 0 eng d | ||
035 | |a (Sirsi) i9780072397949 | ||
040 | |a KUA |c KUA |d UV# | ||
020 | |a 0072397942 | ||
050 | 4 | |a E183.7 |b T36 | |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Taking sides. |p Clashing views on controversial issues in American foreign policy / |c selected, edited, and with introductions by John T. Rourke. |
246 | 1 | 0 | |a Clashing views on controversial issues in American foreign policy |
260 | |a Guilford, Conn. : |b Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, |c c2000. | ||
300 | |a xxi, 408 p. ; |c 24 cm. | ||
520 | |a This debate-style reader is designed to introduce students to controversies in American foreign policy. The readings, which represent the arguments of leading political scientists and researchers, reflect a variety of viewpoint and have been selected for their liveliness and substance and because of their value in a debate framework. By requiring students to analyze opposing viewpoints and reach considered judgments, Taking Sides actively develops student's critical thinking skills. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 | |g The United States and the world: strategic choices. |t Should the United States continue its internationalist policies? -- |t Should the United States seek global hegemony? -- |t Should the United States follow a unilateralist foreign policy? -- |g The United States and the world: regional and bilateral relations. |t Was U.S. intervention in Kosovo justified? -- |t Should the United States continue its current policy with Russia? -- |t Is the U.S. policy of strategic engagement with China ill-conceived? -- |t Should the United States move to substantially ease current sanctions against Cuba? -- |g American foreign policy: the domestic side and policy-making issues. |t Should the president's ability to commit U.S. forces to combat be restricted? -- |t Does the media drive foreign policy? -- |t Should foreign policymakers minimize human rights concerns? -- |g United States international economic and environmental strategy. |t Will the United States remain a global economic power? -- |t Is economic globalization a positive trend for the United States? -- |t Should the Kyoto Treaty on global warming be supported? -- |g United States post-Cold War military strategy. |t Do serious threats to U.S. security exist? -- |t Should the United States immediately build a ballistic missile defense system? -- |t Should Congress ratify the comprehensive test ban treaty? -- |g The United States and international organizations and law. |t Should the United States decline to ratify the International Criminal Court Treaty? -- |t Is the United States justified for not paying its back assessment to the UN? |
651 | 4 | |a Estados Unidos |x Relaciones exteriores. | |
700 | 1 | |a Rourke, John T., |d 1945- | |
901 | |a Z0 |b UV# | ||
902 | |a DBUV | ||
596 | |a 5 | ||
942 | |c LIBRO | ||
999 | |c 174741 |d 174741 |