Cargando…
Taking sides. Clashing views on controversial issues in American foreign policy /
This debate-style reader is designed to introduce students to controversies in American foreign policy. The readings, which represent the arguments of leading political scientists and researchers, reflect a variety of viewpoint and have been selected for their liveliness and substance and because of...
Otros Autores: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Libro |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Guilford, Conn. :
Dushkin/McGraw-Hill,
c2000.
|
Materias: |
Tabla de Contenidos:
- The United States and the world: strategic choices. Should the United States continue its internationalist policies?
- Should the United States seek global hegemony?
- Should the United States follow a unilateralist foreign policy?
- The United States and the world: regional and bilateral relations. Was U.S. intervention in Kosovo justified?
- Should the United States continue its current policy with Russia?
- Is the U.S. policy of strategic engagement with China ill-conceived?
- Should the United States move to substantially ease current sanctions against Cuba?
- American foreign policy: the domestic side and policy-making issues. Should the president's ability to commit U.S. forces to combat be restricted?
- Does the media drive foreign policy?
- Should foreign policymakers minimize human rights concerns?
- United States international economic and environmental strategy. Will the United States remain a global economic power?
- Is economic globalization a positive trend for the United States?
- Should the Kyoto Treaty on global warming be supported?
- United States post-Cold War military strategy. Do serious threats to U.S. security exist?
- Should the United States immediately build a ballistic missile defense system?
- Should Congress ratify the comprehensive test ban treaty?
- The United States and international organizations and law. Should the United States decline to ratify the International Criminal Court Treaty?
- Is the United States justified for not paying its back assessment to the UN?