Comparison of Options for the Injector of PS2

In its report, the SPC Review Panel has highlighted that the construction of a 4 MW SPL has to be motivated by the needs of a well-defined and approved physics programme, and that it should be compared with a Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) when considering only the needs of LHC. This report is mean...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garoby, R, Benedikt, M, Fabich, A, Gerigk, F
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2007
Materias:
Accelerators and Storage Rings
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/1029954
Descripción
Sumario:In its report, the SPC Review Panel has highlighted that the construction of a 4 MW SPL has to be motivated by the needs of a well-defined and approved physics programme, and that it should be compared with a Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) when considering only the needs of LHC. This report is meant to answer these remarks by describing the version of the SPL that would be built for the needs of LHC alone (the Low Power SPL or LP-SPL) and by making a preliminary comparison with an RCS.

Ejemplares similares