Cargando…

Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared

The radiation hardness of silicon charged particle sensors is compared with single crystal and polycrystalline diamond sensors, both experimentally and theoretically. It is shown that for Si- and C-sensors, the NIEL hypothesis, which states that the signal loss is proportional to the Non-Ionizing En...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Boer, Wim, Bol, Johannes, Furgeri, Alexander, Mueller, Steffen, Sander, Christian, Berdermann, Eleni, Pomorski, Michal, Huhtinen, Mika
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200776327
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1032645
_version_ 1780912340729856000
author de Boer, Wim
Bol, Johannes
Furgeri, Alexander
Mueller, Steffen
Sander, Christian
Berdermann, Eleni
Pomorski, Michal
Huhtinen, Mika
author_facet de Boer, Wim
Bol, Johannes
Furgeri, Alexander
Mueller, Steffen
Sander, Christian
Berdermann, Eleni
Pomorski, Michal
Huhtinen, Mika
author_sort de Boer, Wim
collection CERN
description The radiation hardness of silicon charged particle sensors is compared with single crystal and polycrystalline diamond sensors, both experimentally and theoretically. It is shown that for Si- and C-sensors, the NIEL hypothesis, which states that the signal loss is proportional to the Non-Ionizing Energy Loss, is a good approximation to the present data. At incident proton and neutron energies well above 0.1 GeV the radiation damage is dominated by the inelastic cross section, while at non-relativistic energies the elastic cross section prevails. The smaller inelastic nucleon-Carbon cross section and the light nuclear fragments imply that at high energies diamond is an order of magnitude more radiation hard than silicon, while at energies below 0.1 GeV the difference becomes significantly smaller.
id cern-1032645
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2007
record_format invenio
spelling cern-10326452019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1002/pssa.200776327http://cds.cern.ch/record/1032645engde Boer, WimBol, JohannesFurgeri, AlexanderMueller, SteffenSander, ChristianBerdermann, EleniPomorski, MichalHuhtinen, MikaRadiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors comparedDetectors and Experimental TechniquesThe radiation hardness of silicon charged particle sensors is compared with single crystal and polycrystalline diamond sensors, both experimentally and theoretically. It is shown that for Si- and C-sensors, the NIEL hypothesis, which states that the signal loss is proportional to the Non-Ionizing Energy Loss, is a good approximation to the present data. At incident proton and neutron energies well above 0.1 GeV the radiation damage is dominated by the inelastic cross section, while at non-relativistic energies the elastic cross section prevails. The smaller inelastic nucleon-Carbon cross section and the light nuclear fragments imply that at high energies diamond is an order of magnitude more radiation hard than silicon, while at energies below 0.1 GeV the difference becomes significantly smaller.arXiv:0705.0171oai:cds.cern.ch:10326452007-05-03
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
de Boer, Wim
Bol, Johannes
Furgeri, Alexander
Mueller, Steffen
Sander, Christian
Berdermann, Eleni
Pomorski, Michal
Huhtinen, Mika
Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared
title Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared
title_full Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared
title_fullStr Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared
title_full_unstemmed Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared
title_short Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared
title_sort radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200776327
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1032645
work_keys_str_mv AT deboerwim radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared
AT boljohannes radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared
AT furgerialexander radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared
AT muellersteffen radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared
AT sanderchristian radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared
AT berdermanneleni radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared
AT pomorskimichal radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared
AT huhtinenmika radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared