Cargando…
Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared
The radiation hardness of silicon charged particle sensors is compared with single crystal and polycrystalline diamond sensors, both experimentally and theoretically. It is shown that for Si- and C-sensors, the NIEL hypothesis, which states that the signal loss is proportional to the Non-Ionizing En...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200776327 http://cds.cern.ch/record/1032645 |
_version_ | 1780912340729856000 |
---|---|
author | de Boer, Wim Bol, Johannes Furgeri, Alexander Mueller, Steffen Sander, Christian Berdermann, Eleni Pomorski, Michal Huhtinen, Mika |
author_facet | de Boer, Wim Bol, Johannes Furgeri, Alexander Mueller, Steffen Sander, Christian Berdermann, Eleni Pomorski, Michal Huhtinen, Mika |
author_sort | de Boer, Wim |
collection | CERN |
description | The radiation hardness of silicon charged particle sensors is compared with single crystal and polycrystalline diamond sensors, both experimentally and theoretically. It is shown that for Si- and C-sensors, the NIEL hypothesis, which states that the signal loss is proportional to the Non-Ionizing Energy Loss, is a good approximation to the present data. At incident proton and neutron energies well above 0.1 GeV the radiation damage is dominated by the inelastic cross section, while at non-relativistic energies the elastic cross section prevails. The smaller inelastic nucleon-Carbon cross section and the light nuclear fragments imply that at high energies diamond is an order of magnitude more radiation hard than silicon, while at energies below 0.1 GeV the difference becomes significantly smaller. |
id | cern-1032645 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2007 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-10326452019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1002/pssa.200776327http://cds.cern.ch/record/1032645engde Boer, WimBol, JohannesFurgeri, AlexanderMueller, SteffenSander, ChristianBerdermann, EleniPomorski, MichalHuhtinen, MikaRadiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors comparedDetectors and Experimental TechniquesThe radiation hardness of silicon charged particle sensors is compared with single crystal and polycrystalline diamond sensors, both experimentally and theoretically. It is shown that for Si- and C-sensors, the NIEL hypothesis, which states that the signal loss is proportional to the Non-Ionizing Energy Loss, is a good approximation to the present data. At incident proton and neutron energies well above 0.1 GeV the radiation damage is dominated by the inelastic cross section, while at non-relativistic energies the elastic cross section prevails. The smaller inelastic nucleon-Carbon cross section and the light nuclear fragments imply that at high energies diamond is an order of magnitude more radiation hard than silicon, while at energies below 0.1 GeV the difference becomes significantly smaller.arXiv:0705.0171oai:cds.cern.ch:10326452007-05-03 |
spellingShingle | Detectors and Experimental Techniques de Boer, Wim Bol, Johannes Furgeri, Alexander Mueller, Steffen Sander, Christian Berdermann, Eleni Pomorski, Michal Huhtinen, Mika Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared |
title | Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared |
title_full | Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared |
title_fullStr | Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared |
title_short | Radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared |
title_sort | radiation hardness of diamond and silicon sensors compared |
topic | Detectors and Experimental Techniques |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200776327 http://cds.cern.ch/record/1032645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deboerwim radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared AT boljohannes radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared AT furgerialexander radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared AT muellersteffen radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared AT sanderchristian radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared AT berdermanneleni radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared AT pomorskimichal radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared AT huhtinenmika radiationhardnessofdiamondandsiliconsensorscompared |