Cargando…
Comparisons of the MINOS Near and Far Detector Readout Systems at a Test Beam
MINOS is a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment that uses two detectors separated by 734 km. The readout systems used for the two detectors are different and have to be independently calibrated. To verify and make a direct comparison of the calibrated response of the two readout systems, te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.07.016 http://cds.cern.ch/record/1160413 |
_version_ | 1780915865048317952 |
---|---|
author | Cabrera, A. Adamson, P. Barker, M. Belias, A. Boyd, S. Crone, G. Drake, G. Falk, E. Harris, P.G. Hartnell, J. Jenner, L. Kordosky, M. Lang, K. Litchfield, R.P. de Michael, D. Miyagawa, P.S. Morse, R. Murgia, Simona Nichol, R. Nicholls, T. Pearce, G.F. Petyt, D. Reyna, D. Saakyan, R. Shanahan, P. Smith, C. Symes, P. Tagg, N. Thomas, J. Vahle, P. Weber, A. |
author_facet | Cabrera, A. Adamson, P. Barker, M. Belias, A. Boyd, S. Crone, G. Drake, G. Falk, E. Harris, P.G. Hartnell, J. Jenner, L. Kordosky, M. Lang, K. Litchfield, R.P. de Michael, D. Miyagawa, P.S. Morse, R. Murgia, Simona Nichol, R. Nicholls, T. Pearce, G.F. Petyt, D. Reyna, D. Saakyan, R. Shanahan, P. Smith, C. Symes, P. Tagg, N. Thomas, J. Vahle, P. Weber, A. |
author_sort | Cabrera, A. |
collection | CERN |
description | MINOS is a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment that uses two detectors separated by 734 km. The readout systems used for the two detectors are different and have to be independently calibrated. To verify and make a direct comparison of the calibrated response of the two readout systems, test beam data were acquired using a smaller calibration detector. This detector was simultaneously instrumented with both readout systems and exposed to the CERN PS T7 test beam. Differences in the calibrated response of the two systems are shown to arise from differences in response non-linearity, photomultiplier crosstalk, and threshold effects at the few percent level. These differences are reproduced by the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to better than 1% and a scheme that corrects for these differences by calibrating the MC to match the data in each detector separately is presented. The overall difference in calorimetric response between the two readout systems is shown to be consistent with zero to a precision of 1.3% in data and 0.3% in MC with no significant energy dependence. |
id | cern-1160413 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2009 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-11604132020-08-28T12:56:25Zdoi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.07.016http://cds.cern.ch/record/1160413engCabrera, A.Adamson, P.Barker, M.Belias, A.Boyd, S.Crone, G.Drake, G.Falk, E.Harris, P.G.Hartnell, J.Jenner, L.Kordosky, M.Lang, K.Litchfield, R.P.de Michael, D.Miyagawa, P.S.Morse, R.Murgia, SimonaNichol, R.Nicholls, T.Pearce, G.F.Petyt, D.Reyna, D.Saakyan, R.Shanahan, P.Smith, C.Symes, P.Tagg, N.Thomas, J.Vahle, P.Weber, A.Comparisons of the MINOS Near and Far Detector Readout Systems at a Test Beamphysics.ins-detMINOS is a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment that uses two detectors separated by 734 km. The readout systems used for the two detectors are different and have to be independently calibrated. To verify and make a direct comparison of the calibrated response of the two readout systems, test beam data were acquired using a smaller calibration detector. This detector was simultaneously instrumented with both readout systems and exposed to the CERN PS T7 test beam. Differences in the calibrated response of the two systems are shown to arise from differences in response non-linearity, photomultiplier crosstalk, and threshold effects at the few percent level. These differences are reproduced by the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to better than 1% and a scheme that corrects for these differences by calibrating the MC to match the data in each detector separately is presented. The overall difference in calorimetric response between the two readout systems is shown to be consistent with zero to a precision of 1.3% in data and 0.3% in MC with no significant energy dependence.arXiv:0902.1116FERMILAB-PUB-09-050-Eoai:cds.cern.ch:11604132009-02-09 |
spellingShingle | physics.ins-det Cabrera, A. Adamson, P. Barker, M. Belias, A. Boyd, S. Crone, G. Drake, G. Falk, E. Harris, P.G. Hartnell, J. Jenner, L. Kordosky, M. Lang, K. Litchfield, R.P. de Michael, D. Miyagawa, P.S. Morse, R. Murgia, Simona Nichol, R. Nicholls, T. Pearce, G.F. Petyt, D. Reyna, D. Saakyan, R. Shanahan, P. Smith, C. Symes, P. Tagg, N. Thomas, J. Vahle, P. Weber, A. Comparisons of the MINOS Near and Far Detector Readout Systems at a Test Beam |
title | Comparisons of the MINOS Near and Far Detector Readout Systems at a Test Beam |
title_full | Comparisons of the MINOS Near and Far Detector Readout Systems at a Test Beam |
title_fullStr | Comparisons of the MINOS Near and Far Detector Readout Systems at a Test Beam |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons of the MINOS Near and Far Detector Readout Systems at a Test Beam |
title_short | Comparisons of the MINOS Near and Far Detector Readout Systems at a Test Beam |
title_sort | comparisons of the minos near and far detector readout systems at a test beam |
topic | physics.ins-det |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.07.016 http://cds.cern.ch/record/1160413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cabreraa comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT adamsonp comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT barkerm comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT beliasa comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT boyds comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT croneg comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT drakeg comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT falke comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT harrispg comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT hartnellj comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT jennerl comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT kordoskym comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT langk comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT litchfieldrp comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT demichaeld comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT miyagawaps comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT morser comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT murgiasimona comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT nicholr comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT nichollst comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT pearcegf comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT petytd comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT reynad comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT saakyanr comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT shanahanp comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT smithc comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT symesp comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT taggn comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT thomasj comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT vahlep comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam AT webera comparisonsoftheminosnearandfardetectorreadoutsystemsatatestbeam |