Cargando…
HOM Dampers or not in SUPERCONDUCTING RF Proton Linacs
Circular machines are plagued by Coupled Bunch Instabilities, driven by impedance peaks, irrespectively of their frequency relation to machine lines; hence all cavity Higher Order Modes are possible drivers. This is the fundamental reason that all superconducting RF cavities in circular machines are...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1182105 |
_version_ | 1780916367784935424 |
---|---|
author | Tückmantel, Joachim |
author_facet | Tückmantel, Joachim |
author_sort | Tückmantel, Joachim |
collection | CERN |
description | Circular machines are plagued by Coupled Bunch Instabilities, driven by impedance peaks, irrespectively of their frequency relation to machine lines; hence all cavity Higher Order Modes are possible drivers. This is the fundamental reason that all superconducting RF cavities in circular machines are equipped with HOM dampers. This raises the question if HOM damping would not be imperative also in high current proton linacs where a mechanism akin to CBI might exist. To clarify this question we have simulated the longitudinal bunched beam dynamics in linacs, allowing bunch-to-bunch variations in time-of-arrival. Simulations were executed for a generic proton linac with properties close to SNS or the planned SPL at CERN. It was found that for monopole HOMs with high Qext large beam scatter or even beam loss cannot be excluded. Therefore omitting HOM dampers on superconducting RF cavities in high current proton linacs, even pulsed ones, is a very risky decision. |
id | cern-1182105 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2009 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-11821052019-09-30T06:29:59Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1182105engTückmantel, JoachimHOM Dampers or not in SUPERCONDUCTING RF Proton LinacsAccelerators and Storage RingsCircular machines are plagued by Coupled Bunch Instabilities, driven by impedance peaks, irrespectively of their frequency relation to machine lines; hence all cavity Higher Order Modes are possible drivers. This is the fundamental reason that all superconducting RF cavities in circular machines are equipped with HOM dampers. This raises the question if HOM damping would not be imperative also in high current proton linacs where a mechanism akin to CBI might exist. To clarify this question we have simulated the longitudinal bunched beam dynamics in linacs, allowing bunch-to-bunch variations in time-of-arrival. Simulations were executed for a generic proton linac with properties close to SNS or the planned SPL at CERN. It was found that for monopole HOMs with high Qext large beam scatter or even beam loss cannot be excluded. Therefore omitting HOM dampers on superconducting RF cavities in high current proton linacs, even pulsed ones, is a very risky decision.sLHC-Project-Note-0002CERN-sLHC-Project-Note-0002oai:cds.cern.ch:11821052009-06-10 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Tückmantel, Joachim HOM Dampers or not in SUPERCONDUCTING RF Proton Linacs |
title | HOM Dampers or not in SUPERCONDUCTING RF Proton Linacs |
title_full | HOM Dampers or not in SUPERCONDUCTING RF Proton Linacs |
title_fullStr | HOM Dampers or not in SUPERCONDUCTING RF Proton Linacs |
title_full_unstemmed | HOM Dampers or not in SUPERCONDUCTING RF Proton Linacs |
title_short | HOM Dampers or not in SUPERCONDUCTING RF Proton Linacs |
title_sort | hom dampers or not in superconducting rf proton linacs |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1182105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuckmanteljoachim homdampersornotinsuperconductingrfprotonlinacs |