Cargando…

Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part II: Bonner sphere spectrometry

The European Commission has funded within its 6th Framework Programme a three-year project (2005–2007) called CONRAD, COordinated Network for RAdiation Dosimetry. A major task of the CONRAD Work Package “complex mixed radiation fields at workplaces” was to organise a benchmark exercise in a workplac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiegel, B, Agosteo, S, Bedogni, R, Caresana, M, Esposito, A, Fehrenbacher, G, Ferrarini, M, Hohmann, E, Hranitzky, C, Kasper, A, Khurana, S, Mares, V, Reginatto, M, Rollet, S, Rühm, W, Schardt, D, Silari, M, Simmer, G, Weitzenegger, E
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.03.026
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1266568
_version_ 1780920100841324544
author Wiegel, B
Agosteo, S
Bedogni, R
Caresana, M
Esposito, A
Fehrenbacher, G
Ferrarini, M
Hohmann, E
Hranitzky, C
Kasper, A
Khurana, S
Mares, V
Reginatto, M
Rollet, S
Rühm, W
Schardt, D
Silari, M
Simmer, G
Weitzenegger, E
author_facet Wiegel, B
Agosteo, S
Bedogni, R
Caresana, M
Esposito, A
Fehrenbacher, G
Ferrarini, M
Hohmann, E
Hranitzky, C
Kasper, A
Khurana, S
Mares, V
Reginatto, M
Rollet, S
Rühm, W
Schardt, D
Silari, M
Simmer, G
Weitzenegger, E
author_sort Wiegel, B
collection CERN
description The European Commission has funded within its 6th Framework Programme a three-year project (2005–2007) called CONRAD, COordinated Network for RAdiation Dosimetry. A major task of the CONRAD Work Package “complex mixed radiation fields at workplaces” was to organise a benchmark exercise in a workplace field at a high-energy particle accelerator where neutrons are the dominant radiation component. The CONRAD benchmark exercise took place at the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung mbH (GSI) in Darmstadt, Germany in July 2006. In this paper, the results of the spectrometry using four extended -range Bonner sphere spectrometers of four different institutes are reported. Outside Cave A the neutron spectra were measured with three spectrometers at six selected positions and ambient dose equivalent values were derived for use in the intercomparison with other area monitors and dosemeters. At a common position all three spectrometers were used to allow a direct comparison of their results which acts as an internal quality assurance. The comparison of the neutron spectra measured by the different groups shows very good agreement. A detailed analysis presents some differences between the shapes of the spectra and possible sources of these differences are discussed. However, the ability of Bonner sphere spectrometers to provide reliable integral quantities like fluence and ambient dose equivalent is well demonstrated in this exercise. The fluence and dose results derived by the three groups agree very well within the given uncertainties, not only with respect to the total energy region present in this environment but also for selected energy regions which contribute in certain strength to the total values. In addition to the positions outside Cave A one spectrometer was used to measure the neutron spectrum at one position in the entry maze of Cave A. In this case a comparison was possible to earlier measurements.
id cern-1266568
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2009
record_format invenio
spelling cern-12665682019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.03.026http://cds.cern.ch/record/1266568engWiegel, BAgosteo, SBedogni, RCaresana, MEsposito, AFehrenbacher, GFerrarini, MHohmann, EHranitzky, CKasper, AKhurana, SMares, VReginatto, MRollet, SRühm, WSchardt, DSilari, MSimmer, GWeitzenegger, EIntercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part II: Bonner sphere spectrometryDetectors and Experimental TechniquesThe European Commission has funded within its 6th Framework Programme a three-year project (2005–2007) called CONRAD, COordinated Network for RAdiation Dosimetry. A major task of the CONRAD Work Package “complex mixed radiation fields at workplaces” was to organise a benchmark exercise in a workplace field at a high-energy particle accelerator where neutrons are the dominant radiation component. The CONRAD benchmark exercise took place at the Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung mbH (GSI) in Darmstadt, Germany in July 2006. In this paper, the results of the spectrometry using four extended -range Bonner sphere spectrometers of four different institutes are reported. Outside Cave A the neutron spectra were measured with three spectrometers at six selected positions and ambient dose equivalent values were derived for use in the intercomparison with other area monitors and dosemeters. At a common position all three spectrometers were used to allow a direct comparison of their results which acts as an internal quality assurance. The comparison of the neutron spectra measured by the different groups shows very good agreement. A detailed analysis presents some differences between the shapes of the spectra and possible sources of these differences are discussed. However, the ability of Bonner sphere spectrometers to provide reliable integral quantities like fluence and ambient dose equivalent is well demonstrated in this exercise. The fluence and dose results derived by the three groups agree very well within the given uncertainties, not only with respect to the total energy region present in this environment but also for selected energy regions which contribute in certain strength to the total values. In addition to the positions outside Cave A one spectrometer was used to measure the neutron spectrum at one position in the entry maze of Cave A. In this case a comparison was possible to earlier measurements.oai:cds.cern.ch:12665682009
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Wiegel, B
Agosteo, S
Bedogni, R
Caresana, M
Esposito, A
Fehrenbacher, G
Ferrarini, M
Hohmann, E
Hranitzky, C
Kasper, A
Khurana, S
Mares, V
Reginatto, M
Rollet, S
Rühm, W
Schardt, D
Silari, M
Simmer, G
Weitzenegger, E
Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part II: Bonner sphere spectrometry
title Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part II: Bonner sphere spectrometry
title_full Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part II: Bonner sphere spectrometry
title_fullStr Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part II: Bonner sphere spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part II: Bonner sphere spectrometry
title_short Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part II: Bonner sphere spectrometry
title_sort intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. part ii: bonner sphere spectrometry
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.03.026
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1266568
work_keys_str_mv AT wiegelb intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT agosteos intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT bedognir intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT caresanam intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT espositoa intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT fehrenbacherg intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT ferrarinim intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT hohmanne intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT hranitzkyc intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT kaspera intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT khuranas intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT maresv intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT reginattom intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT rollets intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT ruhmw intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT schardtd intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT silarim intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT simmerg intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry
AT weitzeneggere intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiibonnerspherespectrometry