Cargando…
Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response
The European Commission has funded within its 6th Framework Programme a three-year project (2005–2007) called CONRAD, COordinated Network for RAdiation Dosimetry. The organizational framework for this project was provided by the European radiation Dosimetry Group EURADOS. Work Package 6 of CONRAD de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005 http://cds.cern.ch/record/1266578 |
_version_ | 1780920103102054400 |
---|---|
author | Silari, M Agosteo, S Beck, P Bedogni, R Cale, E Caresana, M Domingo, C Donadille, L Dubourg, N Esposito, A Fehrenbacher, G Fernández, F Ferrarini, M Fiechtner, A Fuchs, A García, M J Golnik, N Gutermuth, F Khurana, S Klages, Th Latocha, M Mares, V Mayer, S Radon, T Reithmeier, H Rollet, S Roos, H Rühm, W Sandri, S Schardt, D Simmer, G Spurný, F Trompier, F Villa-Grasa, C Weitzenegger, E Wiegel, B Wielunski, M Wissmann, F Zechner, A Zielczyński, M |
author_facet | Silari, M Agosteo, S Beck, P Bedogni, R Cale, E Caresana, M Domingo, C Donadille, L Dubourg, N Esposito, A Fehrenbacher, G Fernández, F Ferrarini, M Fiechtner, A Fuchs, A García, M J Golnik, N Gutermuth, F Khurana, S Klages, Th Latocha, M Mares, V Mayer, S Radon, T Reithmeier, H Rollet, S Roos, H Rühm, W Sandri, S Schardt, D Simmer, G Spurný, F Trompier, F Villa-Grasa, C Weitzenegger, E Wiegel, B Wielunski, M Wissmann, F Zechner, A Zielczyński, M |
author_sort | Silari, M |
collection | CERN |
description | The European Commission has funded within its 6th Framework Programme a three-year project (2005–2007) called CONRAD, COordinated Network for RAdiation Dosimetry. The organizational framework for this project was provided by the European radiation Dosimetry Group EURADOS. Work Package 6 of CONRAD dealt with “complex mixed radiation fields at workplaces” and in this context it organised a benchmark exercise, which included both measurements and calculations, in a stray radiation field at a high-energy particle accelerator at GSI, Germany. The aim was to intercompare the response of several types of active detectors and passive dosemeters in a well-characterised workplace field. The Monte Carlo simulations of the radiation field and the experimental determination of the neutron spectra with various Bonner Sphere Spectrometers are discussed in Rollet et al. (2008) and in Wiegel et al. (2008). This paper focuses on the intercomparison of the response of the dosemeters in terms of ambient dose equivalent. The paper describes in detail the detectors employed in the experiment, followed by a discussion of the results. A comparison is also made with the H*(10) values predicted by the Monte Carlo simulations and those measured by the BSS systems. |
id | cern-1266578 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2009 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-12665782019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005http://cds.cern.ch/record/1266578engSilari, MAgosteo, SBeck, PBedogni, RCale, ECaresana, MDomingo, CDonadille, LDubourg, NEsposito, AFehrenbacher, GFernández, FFerrarini, MFiechtner, AFuchs, AGarcía, M JGolnik, NGutermuth, FKhurana, SKlages, ThLatocha, MMares, VMayer, SRadon, TReithmeier, HRollet, SRoos, HRühm, WSandri, SSchardt, DSimmer, GSpurný, FTrompier, FVilla-Grasa, CWeitzenegger, EWiegel, BWielunski, MWissmann, FZechner, AZielczyński, MIntercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument responseDetectors and Experimental TechniquesThe European Commission has funded within its 6th Framework Programme a three-year project (2005–2007) called CONRAD, COordinated Network for RAdiation Dosimetry. The organizational framework for this project was provided by the European radiation Dosimetry Group EURADOS. Work Package 6 of CONRAD dealt with “complex mixed radiation fields at workplaces” and in this context it organised a benchmark exercise, which included both measurements and calculations, in a stray radiation field at a high-energy particle accelerator at GSI, Germany. The aim was to intercompare the response of several types of active detectors and passive dosemeters in a well-characterised workplace field. The Monte Carlo simulations of the radiation field and the experimental determination of the neutron spectra with various Bonner Sphere Spectrometers are discussed in Rollet et al. (2008) and in Wiegel et al. (2008). This paper focuses on the intercomparison of the response of the dosemeters in terms of ambient dose equivalent. The paper describes in detail the detectors employed in the experiment, followed by a discussion of the results. A comparison is also made with the H*(10) values predicted by the Monte Carlo simulations and those measured by the BSS systems.oai:cds.cern.ch:12665782009 |
spellingShingle | Detectors and Experimental Techniques Silari, M Agosteo, S Beck, P Bedogni, R Cale, E Caresana, M Domingo, C Donadille, L Dubourg, N Esposito, A Fehrenbacher, G Fernández, F Ferrarini, M Fiechtner, A Fuchs, A García, M J Golnik, N Gutermuth, F Khurana, S Klages, Th Latocha, M Mares, V Mayer, S Radon, T Reithmeier, H Rollet, S Roos, H Rühm, W Sandri, S Schardt, D Simmer, G Spurný, F Trompier, F Villa-Grasa, C Weitzenegger, E Wiegel, B Wielunski, M Wissmann, F Zechner, A Zielczyński, M Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response |
title | Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response |
title_full | Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response |
title_fullStr | Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response |
title_full_unstemmed | Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response |
title_short | Intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. Part III: Instrument response |
title_sort | intercomparison of radiation protection devices in a high-energy stray neutron field. part iii: instrument response |
topic | Detectors and Experimental Techniques |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.05.005 http://cds.cern.ch/record/1266578 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silarim intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT agosteos intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT beckp intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT bedognir intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT calee intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT caresanam intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT domingoc intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT donadillel intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT dubourgn intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT espositoa intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT fehrenbacherg intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT fernandezf intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT ferrarinim intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT fiechtnera intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT fuchsa intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT garciamj intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT golnikn intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT gutermuthf intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT khuranas intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT klagesth intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT latocham intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT maresv intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT mayers intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT radont intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT reithmeierh intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT rollets intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT roosh intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT ruhmw intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT sandris intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT schardtd intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT simmerg intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT spurnyf intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT trompierf intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT villagrasac intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT weitzeneggere intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT wiegelb intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT wielunskim intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT wissmannf intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT zechnera intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse AT zielczynskim intercomparisonofradiationprotectiondevicesinahighenergystrayneutronfieldpartiiiinstrumentresponse |