Cargando…
Comparison of PS2 Lattices with different geometries
The PS2 ring is designed with Negative Momentum Compaction (NMC) arc cells and doublet straights. In this paper, different lattice geometries are considered. In particular, a two-fold symmetric lattice with dispersion suppressors and a 3-fold symmetric one with resonant arc cells are compared with r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1269898 |
_version_ | 1780920178228330496 |
---|---|
author | Bartosik, H Lachaize, A Papaphilippou, Y Bartmann, W Benedikt, M Goddard, B |
author_facet | Bartosik, H Lachaize, A Papaphilippou, Y Bartmann, W Benedikt, M Goddard, B |
author_sort | Bartosik, H |
collection | CERN |
description | The PS2 ring is designed with Negative Momentum Compaction (NMC) arc cells and doublet straights. In this paper, different lattice geometries are considered. In particular, a two-fold symmetric lattice with dispersion suppressors and a 3-fold symmetric one with resonant arc cells are compared with respect to their optics properties, and ability to satisfy space and magnet constraints. The tuning flexibility of rings based on these two options is presented. Finally, the impact of different geometries on resonance excitation and dynamic aperture is evaluated. |
id | cern-1269898 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2010 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-12698982022-08-17T13:24:32Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1269898engBartosik, HLachaize, APapaphilippou, YBartmann, WBenedikt, MGoddard, BComparison of PS2 Lattices with different geometriesAccelerators and Storage RingsThe PS2 ring is designed with Negative Momentum Compaction (NMC) arc cells and doublet straights. In this paper, different lattice geometries are considered. In particular, a two-fold symmetric lattice with dispersion suppressors and a 3-fold symmetric one with resonant arc cells are compared with respect to their optics properties, and ability to satisfy space and magnet constraints. The tuning flexibility of rings based on these two options is presented. Finally, the impact of different geometries on resonance excitation and dynamic aperture is evaluated.CERN-ATS-2010-067oai:cds.cern.ch:12698982010-06-04 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Bartosik, H Lachaize, A Papaphilippou, Y Bartmann, W Benedikt, M Goddard, B Comparison of PS2 Lattices with different geometries |
title | Comparison of PS2 Lattices with different geometries |
title_full | Comparison of PS2 Lattices with different geometries |
title_fullStr | Comparison of PS2 Lattices with different geometries |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of PS2 Lattices with different geometries |
title_short | Comparison of PS2 Lattices with different geometries |
title_sort | comparison of ps2 lattices with different geometries |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1269898 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartosikh comparisonofps2latticeswithdifferentgeometries AT lachaizea comparisonofps2latticeswithdifferentgeometries AT papaphilippouy comparisonofps2latticeswithdifferentgeometries AT bartmannw comparisonofps2latticeswithdifferentgeometries AT benediktm comparisonofps2latticeswithdifferentgeometries AT goddardb comparisonofps2latticeswithdifferentgeometries |