Cargando…
How mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics
To many outsiders, mathematicians appear to think like computers, grimly grinding away with a strict formal logic and moving methodically--even algorithmically--from one black-and-white deduction to another. Yet mathematicians often describe their most important breakthroughs as creative, intuitive...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
Princeton Univ. Press
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1271087 |
_version_ | 1780920210939707392 |
---|---|
author | Byers, William |
author_facet | Byers, William |
author_sort | Byers, William |
collection | CERN |
description | To many outsiders, mathematicians appear to think like computers, grimly grinding away with a strict formal logic and moving methodically--even algorithmically--from one black-and-white deduction to another. Yet mathematicians often describe their most important breakthroughs as creative, intuitive responses to ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox. A unique examination of this less-familiar aspect of mathematics, How Mathematicians Think reveals that mathematics is a profoundly creative activity and not just a body of formalized rules and results |
id | cern-1271087 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Princeton Univ. Press |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-12710872021-04-22T01:17:31Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1271087engByers, WilliamHow mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathicsMathematical Physics and MathematicsTo many outsiders, mathematicians appear to think like computers, grimly grinding away with a strict formal logic and moving methodically--even algorithmically--from one black-and-white deduction to another. Yet mathematicians often describe their most important breakthroughs as creative, intuitive responses to ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox. A unique examination of this less-familiar aspect of mathematics, How Mathematicians Think reveals that mathematics is a profoundly creative activity and not just a body of formalized rules and resultsPrinceton Univ. Pressoai:cds.cern.ch:12710872007 |
spellingShingle | Mathematical Physics and Mathematics Byers, William How mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics |
title | How mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics |
title_full | How mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics |
title_fullStr | How mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics |
title_full_unstemmed | How mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics |
title_short | How mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics |
title_sort | how mathematicians think: using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathemathics |
topic | Mathematical Physics and Mathematics |
url | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1271087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT byerswilliam howmathematiciansthinkusingambiguitycontradictionandparadoxtocreatemathemathics |