Cargando…
Reply to 'Corrections to the HARP-CDP Analysis of the LSND Neutrino Oscillation Backgrounds'
The alleged mistakes in recent papers that reanalyze the backgrounds to the 'LSND anomaly' do not exist. We maintain our conclusion that the significance of the 'LSND anomaly' is not 3.8 sigma but not larger than 2.3 sigma.
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1408145 |
_version_ | 1780923820058607616 |
---|---|
author | Bolshakova, A. Boyko, I. Chelkov, G. Dedovitch, D. Elagin, A. Emelyanov, D. Gostkin, M. Guskov, A. Kroumchtein, Z. Nefedov, Yu. Nikolaev, K. Zhemchugov, A. Dydak, F. Wotschack, J. De Min, A. Ammosov, V. Gapienko, V. Koreshev, V. Semak, A. Sviridov, Yu. Usenko, E. Zaets, V. |
author_facet | Bolshakova, A. Boyko, I. Chelkov, G. Dedovitch, D. Elagin, A. Emelyanov, D. Gostkin, M. Guskov, A. Kroumchtein, Z. Nefedov, Yu. Nikolaev, K. Zhemchugov, A. Dydak, F. Wotschack, J. De Min, A. Ammosov, V. Gapienko, V. Koreshev, V. Semak, A. Sviridov, Yu. Usenko, E. Zaets, V. |
author_sort | Bolshakova, A. |
collection | CERN |
description | The alleged mistakes in recent papers that reanalyze the backgrounds to the 'LSND anomaly' do not exist. We maintain our conclusion that the significance of the 'LSND anomaly' is not 3.8 sigma but not larger than 2.3 sigma. |
id | cern-1408145 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2011 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-14081452023-03-14T17:28:29Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1408145engBolshakova, A.Boyko, I.Chelkov, G.Dedovitch, D.Elagin, A.Emelyanov, D.Gostkin, M.Guskov, A.Kroumchtein, Z.Nefedov, Yu.Nikolaev, K.Zhemchugov, A.Dydak, F.Wotschack, J.De Min, A.Ammosov, V.Gapienko, V.Koreshev, V.Semak, A.Sviridov, Yu.Usenko, E.Zaets, V.Reply to 'Corrections to the HARP-CDP Analysis of the LSND Neutrino Oscillation Backgrounds'Particle Physics - ExperimentThe alleged mistakes in recent papers that reanalyze the backgrounds to the 'LSND anomaly' do not exist. We maintain our conclusion that the significance of the 'LSND anomaly' is not 3.8 sigma but not larger than 2.3 sigma.The alleged mistakes in recent papers that reanalyze the backgrounds to the 'LSND anomaly' do not exist. We maintain our conclusion that the significance of the 'LSND anomaly' is not 3.8 sigma but not larger than 2.3 sigma.arXiv:1112.3852oai:cds.cern.ch:14081452011-12-19 |
spellingShingle | Particle Physics - Experiment Bolshakova, A. Boyko, I. Chelkov, G. Dedovitch, D. Elagin, A. Emelyanov, D. Gostkin, M. Guskov, A. Kroumchtein, Z. Nefedov, Yu. Nikolaev, K. Zhemchugov, A. Dydak, F. Wotschack, J. De Min, A. Ammosov, V. Gapienko, V. Koreshev, V. Semak, A. Sviridov, Yu. Usenko, E. Zaets, V. Reply to 'Corrections to the HARP-CDP Analysis of the LSND Neutrino Oscillation Backgrounds' |
title | Reply to 'Corrections to the HARP-CDP Analysis of the LSND Neutrino Oscillation Backgrounds' |
title_full | Reply to 'Corrections to the HARP-CDP Analysis of the LSND Neutrino Oscillation Backgrounds' |
title_fullStr | Reply to 'Corrections to the HARP-CDP Analysis of the LSND Neutrino Oscillation Backgrounds' |
title_full_unstemmed | Reply to 'Corrections to the HARP-CDP Analysis of the LSND Neutrino Oscillation Backgrounds' |
title_short | Reply to 'Corrections to the HARP-CDP Analysis of the LSND Neutrino Oscillation Backgrounds' |
title_sort | reply to 'corrections to the harp-cdp analysis of the lsnd neutrino oscillation backgrounds' |
topic | Particle Physics - Experiment |
url | http://cds.cern.ch/record/1408145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bolshakovaa replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT boykoi replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT chelkovg replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT dedovitchd replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT elagina replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT emelyanovd replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT gostkinm replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT guskova replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT kroumchteinz replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT nefedovyu replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT nikolaevk replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT zhemchugova replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT dydakf replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT wotschackj replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT demina replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT ammosovv replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT gapienkov replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT koreshevv replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT semaka replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT sviridovyu replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT usenkoe replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds AT zaetsv replytocorrectionstotheharpcdpanalysisofthelsndneutrinooscillationbackgrounds |