Cargando…

Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level

We provide a comparative study of the fine tuning amount (Delta) at the two-loop leading log level in supersymmetric models commonly used in SUSY searches at the LHC. These are the constrained MSSM (CMSSM), non-universal Higgs masses models (NUHM1, NUHM2), non-universal gaugino masses model (NUGM) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghilencea, D M, Lee, H M, Park, M
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)046
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1429196
_version_ 1780924317800857600
author Ghilencea, D M
Lee, H M
Park, M
author_facet Ghilencea, D M
Lee, H M
Park, M
author_sort Ghilencea, D M
collection CERN
description We provide a comparative study of the fine tuning amount (Delta) at the two-loop leading log level in supersymmetric models commonly used in SUSY searches at the LHC. These are the constrained MSSM (CMSSM), non-universal Higgs masses models (NUHM1, NUHM2), non-universal gaugino masses model (NUGM) and GUT related gaugino masses models (NUGMd). Two definitions of the fine tuning are used, the first (Delta_{max}) measures maximal fine-tuning wrt individual parameters while the second (Delta_q) adds their contribution in "quadrature". As a direct result of two theoretical constraints (the EW minimum conditions), fine tuning (Delta_q) emerges as a suppressing factor (effective prior) of the averaged likelihood (under the priors), under the integral of the global probability of measuring the data (Bayesian evidence p(D)). For each model, there is little difference between Delta_q, Delta_{max} in the region allowed by the data, with similar behaviour as functions of the Higgs, gluino, stop mass or SUSY scale (m_{susy}=(m_{\tilde t_1} m_{\tilde t_2})^{1/2}) or dark matter and g-2 constraints. The analysis has the advantage that by replacing any of these mass scales or constraints by their latest bounds one easily infers for each model the value of Delta_q, Delta_{max} or vice versa. For all models, minimal fine tuning is achieved for M_{higgs} near 115 GeV with a Delta_q\approx Delta_{max}\approx 10 to 100 depending on the model, and in the CMSSM this is actually a global minimum. Due to a strong ($\approx$ exponential) dependence of Delta on M_{higgs}, for a Higgs mass near 125 GeV, the above values of Delta_q\approx Delta_{max} increase to between 500 and 1000. Possible corrections to these values are briefly discussed.
id cern-1429196
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2012
record_format invenio
spelling cern-14291962019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)046http://cds.cern.ch/record/1429196engGhilencea, D MLee, H MPark, MTuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop levelParticle Physics - PhenomenologyWe provide a comparative study of the fine tuning amount (Delta) at the two-loop leading log level in supersymmetric models commonly used in SUSY searches at the LHC. These are the constrained MSSM (CMSSM), non-universal Higgs masses models (NUHM1, NUHM2), non-universal gaugino masses model (NUGM) and GUT related gaugino masses models (NUGMd). Two definitions of the fine tuning are used, the first (Delta_{max}) measures maximal fine-tuning wrt individual parameters while the second (Delta_q) adds their contribution in "quadrature". As a direct result of two theoretical constraints (the EW minimum conditions), fine tuning (Delta_q) emerges as a suppressing factor (effective prior) of the averaged likelihood (under the priors), under the integral of the global probability of measuring the data (Bayesian evidence p(D)). For each model, there is little difference between Delta_q, Delta_{max} in the region allowed by the data, with similar behaviour as functions of the Higgs, gluino, stop mass or SUSY scale (m_{susy}=(m_{\tilde t_1} m_{\tilde t_2})^{1/2}) or dark matter and g-2 constraints. The analysis has the advantage that by replacing any of these mass scales or constraints by their latest bounds one easily infers for each model the value of Delta_q, Delta_{max} or vice versa. For all models, minimal fine tuning is achieved for M_{higgs} near 115 GeV with a Delta_q\approx Delta_{max}\approx 10 to 100 depending on the model, and in the CMSSM this is actually a global minimum. Due to a strong ($\approx$ exponential) dependence of Delta on M_{higgs}, for a Higgs mass near 125 GeV, the above values of Delta_q\approx Delta_{max} increase to between 500 and 1000. Possible corrections to these values are briefly discussed.arXiv:1203.0569CERN-PH-TH-2012-054oai:cds.cern.ch:14291962012-03-06
spellingShingle Particle Physics - Phenomenology
Ghilencea, D M
Lee, H M
Park, M
Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level
title Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level
title_full Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level
title_fullStr Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level
title_full_unstemmed Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level
title_short Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level
title_sort tuning supersymmetric models at the lhc: a comparative analysis at two-loop level
topic Particle Physics - Phenomenology
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)046
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1429196
work_keys_str_mv AT ghilenceadm tuningsupersymmetricmodelsatthelhcacomparativeanalysisattwolooplevel
AT leehm tuningsupersymmetricmodelsatthelhcacomparativeanalysisattwolooplevel
AT parkm tuningsupersymmetricmodelsatthelhcacomparativeanalysisattwolooplevel