Cargando…

Impact of the choice of physics list on GEANT4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungsten

The development of pion induced showers in a large block of matter (tungsten, lead, iron) is simulated for pions from 1 to 50GeV. Two GEANT4 physics lists (QGSP BERT and QGSP BERT HP) are compared. The deposited energy at each step of the simulation is identified as visible, invisible or escaped. It...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Speckmayer, P
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/1443829
_version_ 1780924731001667584
author Speckmayer, P
author_facet Speckmayer, P
author_sort Speckmayer, P
collection CERN
description The development of pion induced showers in a large block of matter (tungsten, lead, iron) is simulated for pions from 1 to 50GeV. Two GEANT4 physics lists (QGSP BERT and QGSP BERT HP) are compared. The deposited energy at each step of the simulation is identified as visible, invisible or escaped. It will be shown, that for tungsten in most of the hadronic showers more than 90% of the energy is deposited visibly if QGSP BERT is used. This fraction drops to only 60% for QGSP BERT HP. The latter fraction is similar to lead, even when QGSP BERT is used for the simulation. The impact of this behaviour on the energy resolution of a sampling calorimeter with scintillator as active material is shown. Although more energy is deposited visibly for QGSP BERT than for QGSP BERT HP, the reconstructed energy resolution is about 5 to 10% percent better for the latter.
id cern-1443829
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2010
record_format invenio
spelling cern-14438292019-09-30T06:29:59Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1443829engSpeckmayer, PImpact of the choice of physics list on GEANT4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungstenParticle Physics - Experiment The development of pion induced showers in a large block of matter (tungsten, lead, iron) is simulated for pions from 1 to 50GeV. Two GEANT4 physics lists (QGSP BERT and QGSP BERT HP) are compared. The deposited energy at each step of the simulation is identified as visible, invisible or escaped. It will be shown, that for tungsten in most of the hadronic showers more than 90% of the energy is deposited visibly if QGSP BERT is used. This fraction drops to only 60% for QGSP BERT HP. The latter fraction is similar to lead, even when QGSP BERT is used for the simulation. The impact of this behaviour on the energy resolution of a sampling calorimeter with scintillator as active material is shown. Although more energy is deposited visibly for QGSP BERT than for QGSP BERT HP, the reconstructed energy resolution is about 5 to 10% percent better for the latter.LCD-Note-2010-002oai:cds.cern.ch:14438292010
spellingShingle Particle Physics - Experiment
Speckmayer, P
Impact of the choice of physics list on GEANT4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungsten
title Impact of the choice of physics list on GEANT4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungsten
title_full Impact of the choice of physics list on GEANT4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungsten
title_fullStr Impact of the choice of physics list on GEANT4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungsten
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the choice of physics list on GEANT4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungsten
title_short Impact of the choice of physics list on GEANT4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungsten
title_sort impact of the choice of physics list on geant4 simulations of hadronic showers in tungsten
topic Particle Physics - Experiment
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/1443829
work_keys_str_mv AT speckmayerp impactofthechoiceofphysicslistongeant4simulationsofhadronicshowersintungsten