Cargando…

Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases

One of the main attractions of non-relational "NoSQL" databases is their ability to scale to large numbers of readers, including readers spread over a wide area. The Frontier distributed database caching system, used in production by the Large Hadron Collider CMS and ATLAS detector project...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dykstra, David
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/396/5/052031
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1458466
_version_ 1780925158755663872
author Dykstra, David
author_facet Dykstra, David
author_sort Dykstra, David
collection CERN
description One of the main attractions of non-relational "NoSQL" databases is their ability to scale to large numbers of readers, including readers spread over a wide area. The Frontier distributed database caching system, used in production by the Large Hadron Collider CMS and ATLAS detector projects for Conditions data, is based on traditional SQL databases but also has high scalability and wide-area distributability for an important subset of applications. This paper compares the major characteristics of the two different approaches and identifies the criteria for choosing which approach to prefer over the other. It also compares in some detail the NoSQL databases used by CMS and ATLAS: MongoDB, CouchDB, HBase, and Cassandra.
id cern-1458466
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2012
record_format invenio
spelling cern-14584662019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1088/1742-6596/396/5/052031http://cds.cern.ch/record/1458466engDykstra, DavidComparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL DatabasesDetectors and Experimental TechniquesOne of the main attractions of non-relational "NoSQL" databases is their ability to scale to large numbers of readers, including readers spread over a wide area. The Frontier distributed database caching system, used in production by the Large Hadron Collider CMS and ATLAS detector projects for Conditions data, is based on traditional SQL databases but also has high scalability and wide-area distributability for an important subset of applications. This paper compares the major characteristics of the two different approaches and identifies the criteria for choosing which approach to prefer over the other. It also compares in some detail the NoSQL databases used by CMS and ATLAS: MongoDB, CouchDB, HBase, and Cassandra.CMS-CR-2012-109oai:cds.cern.ch:14584662012-05-17
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Dykstra, David
Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_full Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_fullStr Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_short Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_sort comparison of the frontier distributed database caching system with nosql databases
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/396/5/052031
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1458466
work_keys_str_mv AT dykstradavid comparisonofthefrontierdistributeddatabasecachingsystemwithnosqldatabases