Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases

<!--HTML-->Non-relational "NoSQL" databases such as Cassandra and CouchDB are best known for their ability to scale to large numbers of clients spread over a wide area. The Frontier distributed database caching system, used in production by the Large Hadron Collider CMS and ATLAS det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dykstra, Dave
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Conferences
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/1460605
_version_ 1780925243872772096
author Dykstra, Dave
author_facet Dykstra, Dave
author_sort Dykstra, Dave
collection CERN
description <!--HTML-->Non-relational "NoSQL" databases such as Cassandra and CouchDB are best known for their ability to scale to large numbers of clients spread over a wide area. The Frontier distributed database caching system, used in production by the Large Hadron Collider CMS and ATLAS detector projects, is based on traditional SQL databases but also has the same high scalability and wide-area distributability for an important subset of applications. This paper compares the architectures, behavior, performance, and maintainability of the two different approaches and identifies the criteria for choosing which approach to prefer over the other.
id cern-1460605
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2012
record_format invenio
spelling cern-14606052022-11-02T22:23:44Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1460605engDykstra, DaveComparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL DatabasesComputing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP) 2012Conferences<!--HTML-->Non-relational "NoSQL" databases such as Cassandra and CouchDB are best known for their ability to scale to large numbers of clients spread over a wide area. The Frontier distributed database caching system, used in production by the Large Hadron Collider CMS and ATLAS detector projects, is based on traditional SQL databases but also has the same high scalability and wide-area distributability for an important subset of applications. This paper compares the architectures, behavior, performance, and maintainability of the two different approaches and identifies the criteria for choosing which approach to prefer over the other.oai:cds.cern.ch:14606052012
spellingShingle Conferences
Dykstra, Dave
Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_full Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_fullStr Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_short Comparison of the Frontier Distributed Database Caching System with NoSQL Databases
title_sort comparison of the frontier distributed database caching system with nosql databases
topic Conferences
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/1460605
work_keys_str_mv AT dykstradave comparisonofthefrontierdistributeddatabasecachingsystemwithnosqldatabases
AT dykstradave computinginhighenergyandnuclearphysicschep2012

Ejemplares similares