Cargando…

The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the Higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?

On the light of the recent LHC boson discovery, we present a phenomenological evaluation of the ratio $\rho_t=m_Z m_t/m_H^2$, from the LHC combined $m_H$ value, we get ($ (1\sigma)$) $\rho_t^{(exp)}= 0.9956\pm 0.0081$. This value is close to one with a precision of the order $\sim 1\%$. Similarly we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Torrente-Lujan, E.
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2744-3
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1476201
_version_ 1780925543848345600
author Torrente-Lujan, E.
author_facet Torrente-Lujan, E.
author_sort Torrente-Lujan, E.
collection CERN
description On the light of the recent LHC boson discovery, we present a phenomenological evaluation of the ratio $\rho_t=m_Z m_t/m_H^2$, from the LHC combined $m_H$ value, we get ($ (1\sigma)$) $\rho_t^{(exp)}= 0.9956\pm 0.0081$. This value is close to one with a precision of the order $\sim 1\%$. Similarly we evaluate the ratio $\rho_{Wt}=(m_W + m_t)/(2 m_H)$. From the up-to-date mass values we get $\rho_{Wt}^{(exp)}= 1.0066\pm 0.0035 (1\sigma)$. The Higgs mass is numerically close (at the $1\%$ level) to the $m_H\sim (m_W+m_t)/2$. From these relations we can write any two mass ratios as a function of, exclusively, the Weinberg angle (with a precision of the order of $1\%$ or better): \begin{eqnarray} \frac{m_i}{m_j}&\simeq & f_{ij}(\theta_W),\quad i,j=W,Z,H,t. \end{eqnarray} For example:$m_H/m_Z \simeq 1+\sqrt{2} s_{\theta_W/2}^2$, $m_H/m_t c_{\theta_W} \simeq 1-\sqrt{2}s_{ \theta_W/2}^2$. In the limit $\cos\theta_W\to 1$ all the masses would become equal $m_Z=m_W=m_t=m_H$. We review the theoretical situation of this ratio in the SM and beyond. In the SM these relations are rather stable under RGE pointing out to some underlying UV symmetry. In the SM such a ratio hints for a non-casual relation of the type $\lambda \simeq \kappa \left (g^2+{g'}{}^2\right )$ with $\kappa\simeq 1+o(g/g_t)$. Moreover the existence of relations $m_i/m_j \simeq f_{ij}(\theta_W)$ could be interpreted as a hint for a role of the $SU(2)_c$ custodial symmetry, together with other unknown mechanism. Without a symmetry at hand to explain then in the SM, it arises a Higgs mass coincidence problem, why the ratios $\rho_t,\rho_{Wt}$ are so close to one, can we find a mechanism that naturally gives $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$, $2m_H= m_W+m_t$?.
id cern-1476201
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2012
record_format invenio
spelling cern-14762012022-08-10T20:05:39Zdoi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2744-3http://cds.cern.ch/record/1476201engTorrente-Lujan, E.The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the Higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?Particle Physics - PhenomenologyOn the light of the recent LHC boson discovery, we present a phenomenological evaluation of the ratio $\rho_t=m_Z m_t/m_H^2$, from the LHC combined $m_H$ value, we get ($ (1\sigma)$) $\rho_t^{(exp)}= 0.9956\pm 0.0081$. This value is close to one with a precision of the order $\sim 1\%$. Similarly we evaluate the ratio $\rho_{Wt}=(m_W + m_t)/(2 m_H)$. From the up-to-date mass values we get $\rho_{Wt}^{(exp)}= 1.0066\pm 0.0035 (1\sigma)$. The Higgs mass is numerically close (at the $1\%$ level) to the $m_H\sim (m_W+m_t)/2$. From these relations we can write any two mass ratios as a function of, exclusively, the Weinberg angle (with a precision of the order of $1\%$ or better): \begin{eqnarray} \frac{m_i}{m_j}&\simeq & f_{ij}(\theta_W),\quad i,j=W,Z,H,t. \end{eqnarray} For example:$m_H/m_Z \simeq 1+\sqrt{2} s_{\theta_W/2}^2$, $m_H/m_t c_{\theta_W} \simeq 1-\sqrt{2}s_{ \theta_W/2}^2$. In the limit $\cos\theta_W\to 1$ all the masses would become equal $m_Z=m_W=m_t=m_H$. We review the theoretical situation of this ratio in the SM and beyond. In the SM these relations are rather stable under RGE pointing out to some underlying UV symmetry. In the SM such a ratio hints for a non-casual relation of the type $\lambda \simeq \kappa \left (g^2+{g'}{}^2\right )$ with $\kappa\simeq 1+o(g/g_t)$. Moreover the existence of relations $m_i/m_j \simeq f_{ij}(\theta_W)$ could be interpreted as a hint for a role of the $SU(2)_c$ custodial symmetry, together with other unknown mechanism. Without a symmetry at hand to explain then in the SM, it arises a Higgs mass coincidence problem, why the ratios $\rho_t,\rho_{Wt}$ are so close to one, can we find a mechanism that naturally gives $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$, $2m_H= m_W+m_t$?.On the light of the recent LHC boson discovery, we present a phenomenological evaluation of the ratio $\rho_t=m_Z m_t/m_H^2$, from the LHC combined $m_H$ value, we get ($ (1\sigma)$) $$\rho_t^{(exp)}= 0.9956\pm 0.0081.$$ This value is close to one with a precision of the order $\sim 1\%$. Similarly we evaluate the ratio $\rho_{Wt}=(m_W + m_t)/(2 m_H)$. From the up-to-date mass values we get $\rho_{Wt}^{(exp)}= 1.0066\pm 0.0035\; (1\sigma).$ The Higgs mass is numerically close (at the $1\%$ level) to the $m_H\sim (m_W+m_t)/2$. From these relations we can write any two mass ratios as a function of, exclusively, the Weinberg angle (with a precision of the order of $1\%$ or better): \begin{eqnarray} \frac{m_i}{m_j}&\simeq & f_{ij}(\theta_W),\quad i,j=W,Z,H,t. \end{eqnarray} For example:$m_H/m_Z \simeq 1+\sqrt{2} s_{\theta_W/2}^2$, $m_H/m_t c_{\theta_W} \simeq 1-\sqrt{2}s_{ \theta_W/2}^2$. In the limit $\cos\theta_W\to 1$ all the masses would become equal $m_Z=m_W=m_t=m_H$. We review the theoretical situation of this ratio in the SM and beyond. In the SM these relations are rather stable under RGE pointing out to some underlying UV symmetry. In the SM such a ratio hints for a non-casual relation of the type $\lambda \simeq \kappa \left (g^2+{g'}{}^2\right )$ with $\kappa\simeq 1+o(g/g_t)$. Moreover the existence of relations $m_i/m_j \simeq f_{ij}(\theta_W)$ could be interpreted as a hint for a role of the $SU(2)_c$ custodial symmetry, together with other unknown mechanism. % Without a symmetry at hand to explain then in the SM, it arises a Higgs mass coincidence problem, why the ratios $\rho_t,\rho_{Wt}$ are so close to one, can we find a mechanism that naturally gives $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$, $2m_H= m_W+m_t$?.arXiv:1209.0474FISPAC-12-132UQBAR-TH-12-718oai:cds.cern.ch:14762012012-09-05
spellingShingle Particle Physics - Phenomenology
Torrente-Lujan, E.
The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the Higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?
title The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the Higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?
title_full The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the Higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?
title_fullStr The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the Higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?
title_full_unstemmed The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the Higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?
title_short The Higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the Higgs mass $m_H^2=m_Z m_t$?
title_sort higgs mass coincidence problem: why is the higgs mass $m_h^2=m_z m_t$?
topic Particle Physics - Phenomenology
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2744-3
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1476201
work_keys_str_mv AT torrentelujane thehiggsmasscoincidenceproblemwhyisthehiggsmassmh2mzmt
AT torrentelujane higgsmasscoincidenceproblemwhyisthehiggsmassmh2mzmt