Cargando…

LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)

LHC operation in 2011 had a smooth start in March with 75ns beams and only one month later moved to 50ns beam, after a successful dedicated scrubbing run. Several observables, such as pressure rise, heat load in the arcs, beam instability, emittance growth and synchronous phase shift, clearly pointe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rumolo, G, Iadarola, G, Domìnguez, O, Arduini, G, Bartosik, H, Claudet, S, Esteban-Müller, J, Roncarolo, F, Shaposhnikova, E, Tavian, L
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: CERN 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2012-006.89
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1492581
_version_ 1780926459571863552
author Rumolo, G
Iadarola, G
Domìnguez, O
Arduini, G
Bartosik, H
Claudet, S
Esteban-Müller, J
Roncarolo, F
Shaposhnikova, E
Tavian, L
author_facet Rumolo, G
Iadarola, G
Domìnguez, O
Arduini, G
Bartosik, H
Claudet, S
Esteban-Müller, J
Roncarolo, F
Shaposhnikova, E
Tavian, L
author_sort Rumolo, G
collection CERN
description LHC operation in 2011 had a smooth start in March with 75ns beams and only one month later moved to 50ns beam, after a successful dedicated scrubbing run. Several observables, such as pressure rise, heat load in the arcs, beam instability, emittance growth and synchronous phase shift, clearly pointed to the presence of an electron cloud inside the machine during the first days of operation with 50ns beams. The gradual reduction of all these effects, and their eventual disappearance, over the days of the scrubbing run, indicated electron cloud mitigation and allowed physics production to shift to 50ns beams. Up to the end of the run the quality of the 50ns beams was increased by regular stages (first lower transverse emittances, then higher intensities) and they could provide steadily improving peak luminosities. Furthermore, five MD sessions with 25ns beams took place in the period June-October, but the quality of these beams was always deteriorated by severe electron cloud effects. However, a clear improvement was noticed also with the 25ns runs. An estimation of the present state of conditioning of the machine and the required scrubbing time can be inferred from electron cloud simulations compared with measured data.
id cern-1492581
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2012
publisher CERN
record_format invenio
spelling cern-14925812022-08-10T20:40:40Zdoi:10.5170/CERN-2012-006.89http://cds.cern.ch/record/1492581engRumolo, GIadarola, GDomìnguez, OArduini, GBartosik, HClaudet, SEsteban-Müller, JRoncarolo, FShaposhnikova, ETavian, LLHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)Accelerators and Storage RingsLHC operation in 2011 had a smooth start in March with 75ns beams and only one month later moved to 50ns beam, after a successful dedicated scrubbing run. Several observables, such as pressure rise, heat load in the arcs, beam instability, emittance growth and synchronous phase shift, clearly pointed to the presence of an electron cloud inside the machine during the first days of operation with 50ns beams. The gradual reduction of all these effects, and their eventual disappearance, over the days of the scrubbing run, indicated electron cloud mitigation and allowed physics production to shift to 50ns beams. Up to the end of the run the quality of the 50ns beams was increased by regular stages (first lower transverse emittances, then higher intensities) and they could provide steadily improving peak luminosities. Furthermore, five MD sessions with 25ns beams took place in the period June-October, but the quality of these beams was always deteriorated by severe electron cloud effects. However, a clear improvement was noticed also with the 25ns runs. An estimation of the present state of conditioning of the machine and the required scrubbing time can be inferred from electron cloud simulations compared with measured data.CERNoai:cds.cern.ch:14925812012
spellingShingle Accelerators and Storage Rings
Rumolo, G
Iadarola, G
Domìnguez, O
Arduini, G
Bartosik, H
Claudet, S
Esteban-Müller, J
Roncarolo, F
Shaposhnikova, E
Tavian, L
LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)
title LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)
title_full LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)
title_fullStr LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)
title_full_unstemmed LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)
title_short LHC experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)
title_sort lhc experience with different bunch spacings in 2011 (25 , 50 & 75 ns)
topic Accelerators and Storage Rings
url https://dx.doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2012-006.89
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1492581
work_keys_str_mv AT rumolog lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT iadarolag lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT dominguezo lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT arduinig lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT bartosikh lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT claudets lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT estebanmullerj lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT roncarolof lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT shaposhnikovae lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns
AT tavianl lhcexperiencewithdifferentbunchspacingsin2011255075ns