VELO aperture considerations for the LHCb Upgrade

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

In Long Shutdown 2 the VELO detectors will be replaced by new modules compatible with the LHCb Upgrade 40 MHz read-out system. A smaller inner radius of the VELO RF foil and of the silicon sensor active area will allow LHCb to considerably improve the impact parameter resolution. Here, a limit of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Appleby, R B, Ferro-Luzzi, M, Giovannozzi, M, Holzer, B, Neat, M
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Accelerators and Storage Rings
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/1498738
_version_ 1780926737160339456
author Appleby, R B
Ferro-Luzzi, M
Giovannozzi, M
Holzer, B
Neat, M
author_facet Appleby, R B
Ferro-Luzzi, M
Giovannozzi, M
Holzer, B
Neat, M
author_sort Appleby, R B
collection CERN
description In Long Shutdown 2 the VELO detectors will be replaced by new modules compatible with the LHCb Upgrade 40 MHz read-out system. A smaller inner radius of the VELO RF foil and of the silicon sensor active area will allow LHCb to considerably improve the impact parameter resolution. Here, a limit of the minimum VELO aperture during physics (Stable Beams) is discussed. A value of 3.5 mm for the nominal radius of the inner edge fo the RF foil seems acceptable.
id cern-1498738
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2012
record_format invenio
spelling cern-14987382019-09-30T06:29:59Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/1498738engAppleby, R BFerro-Luzzi, MGiovannozzi, MHolzer, BNeat, MVELO aperture considerations for the LHCb UpgradeAccelerators and Storage RingsIn Long Shutdown 2 the VELO detectors will be replaced by new modules compatible with the LHCb Upgrade 40 MHz read-out system. A smaller inner radius of the VELO RF foil and of the silicon sensor active area will allow LHCb to considerably improve the impact parameter resolution. Here, a limit of the minimum VELO aperture during physics (Stable Beams) is discussed. A value of 3.5 mm for the nominal radius of the inner edge fo the RF foil seems acceptable.LHCb-PUB-2012-018CERN-LHCb-PUB-2012-018CERN-ATS-Note-2012-101oai:cds.cern.ch:14987382012-12-14
spellingShingle Accelerators and Storage Rings
Appleby, R B
Ferro-Luzzi, M
Giovannozzi, M
Holzer, B
Neat, M
VELO aperture considerations for the LHCb Upgrade
title VELO aperture considerations for the LHCb Upgrade
title_full VELO aperture considerations for the LHCb Upgrade
title_fullStr VELO aperture considerations for the LHCb Upgrade
title_full_unstemmed VELO aperture considerations for the LHCb Upgrade
title_short VELO aperture considerations for the LHCb Upgrade
title_sort velo aperture considerations for the lhcb upgrade
topic Accelerators and Storage Rings
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/1498738
work_keys_str_mv AT applebyrb veloapertureconsiderationsforthelhcbupgrade
AT ferroluzzim veloapertureconsiderationsforthelhcbupgrade
AT giovannozzim veloapertureconsiderationsforthelhcbupgrade
AT holzerb veloapertureconsiderationsforthelhcbupgrade
AT neatm veloapertureconsiderationsforthelhcbupgrade

Ejemplares similares