Cargando…

Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?

The transition between the two phases of 4D Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation [1] was long believed to be of second order until in 1996 first order behavior was found for sufficiently large systems [3,4]. However, one may wonder if this finding was affected by the numerical methods used: to control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rindlisbacher, Tobias, de Forcrand, Philippe
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.22323/1.187.0096
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1629950
_version_ 1780934158791475200
author Rindlisbacher, Tobias
de Forcrand, Philippe
author_facet Rindlisbacher, Tobias
de Forcrand, Philippe
author_sort Rindlisbacher, Tobias
collection CERN
description The transition between the two phases of 4D Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation [1] was long believed to be of second order until in 1996 first order behavior was found for sufficiently large systems [3,4]. However, one may wonder if this finding was affected by the numerical methods used: to control volume fluctuations, in both studies [3,4] an artificial harmonic potential was added to the action; in [4] measurements were taken after a fixed number of accepted instead of attempted moves which introduces an additional error. Finally the simulations suffer from strong critical slowing down which may have been underestimated. In the present work, we address the above weaknesses: we allow the volume to fluctuate freely within a fixed interval; we take measurements after a fixed number of attempted moves; and we overcome critical slowing down by using an optimized parallel tempering algorithm [6]. With these improved methods, on systems of size up to 64k 4-simplices, we confirm that the phase transition is first order.
id cern-1629950
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2013
record_format invenio
spelling cern-16299502019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.22323/1.187.0096http://cds.cern.ch/record/1629950engRindlisbacher, Tobiasde Forcrand, PhilippeEuclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?Particle Physics - LatticeThe transition between the two phases of 4D Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation [1] was long believed to be of second order until in 1996 first order behavior was found for sufficiently large systems [3,4]. However, one may wonder if this finding was affected by the numerical methods used: to control volume fluctuations, in both studies [3,4] an artificial harmonic potential was added to the action; in [4] measurements were taken after a fixed number of accepted instead of attempted moves which introduces an additional error. Finally the simulations suffer from strong critical slowing down which may have been underestimated. In the present work, we address the above weaknesses: we allow the volume to fluctuate freely within a fixed interval; we take measurements after a fixed number of attempted moves; and we overcome critical slowing down by using an optimized parallel tempering algorithm [6]. With these improved methods, on systems of size up to 64k 4-simplices, we confirm that the phase transition is first order.arXiv:1311.4712CERN-PH-TH-2013-261oai:cds.cern.ch:16299502013-11-19
spellingShingle Particle Physics - Lattice
Rindlisbacher, Tobias
de Forcrand, Philippe
Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?
title Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?
title_full Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?
title_fullStr Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?
title_full_unstemmed Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?
title_short Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?
title_sort euclidean dynamical triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?
topic Particle Physics - Lattice
url https://dx.doi.org/10.22323/1.187.0096
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1629950
work_keys_str_mv AT rindlisbachertobias euclideandynamicaltriangulationrevisitedisthephasetransitionreallyfirstorder
AT deforcrandphilippe euclideandynamicaltriangulationrevisitedisthephasetransitionreallyfirstorder