Cargando…

The death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning

This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored with Douglas Walton, and is a further major contribution to the Woods-Walton Approach to the logic of fallacious reasoning No one disputes the formitable accomplishments of modern mathematical logic;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Woods, John
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: Springer 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1663990
_version_ 1780935249039982592
author Woods, John
author_facet Woods, John
author_sort Woods, John
collection CERN
description This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored with Douglas Walton, and is a further major contribution to the Woods-Walton Approach to the logic of fallacious reasoning No one disputes the formitable accomplishments of modern mathematical logic; but equally no one seriously believes that classical logic is much good for the analysis of real-life argument and reasoning, or that it is the best place in which to transact the business of fallacy theory One of the principal innovations of the book is its adaptation of systems of logic to the particular requirements of fallacy theory The book develops logical analyses which take into account such features of real-life cognitive agency as resource- availability and computational complexity The book is also an invitation to interdisciplinary cooperation, linking the relevant branches of logic with computer science, cognitive psychology, neurobiology, forensic science, linguistics, (including conversational analysis and discourse analysis) and argumentation theory Another distinctive feature of Woods’ approach to fallacy theory is its recognition of the highly defeasible character of fallacy-attributions On this view, reasoning is fallacious only in relation to the cognitive target that the reasoner seeks to hit, the standard required for its attainment, and the cognitive resources available to the reasoner Accordingly the so-called Standard Treatment of the fallacies is seriously misconceived Getting the fallacies right is an extremely important task for logic, indeed a central part of its mandate It is a task much more avowed than performed The Death of Argument is a major attempt to redress this inbalance
id cern-1663990
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2004
publisher Springer
record_format invenio
spelling cern-16639902021-04-21T21:18:53Zdoi:10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3http://cds.cern.ch/record/1663990engWoods, JohnThe death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoningMathematical Physics and MathematicsThis book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored with Douglas Walton, and is a further major contribution to the Woods-Walton Approach to the logic of fallacious reasoning No one disputes the formitable accomplishments of modern mathematical logic; but equally no one seriously believes that classical logic is much good for the analysis of real-life argument and reasoning, or that it is the best place in which to transact the business of fallacy theory One of the principal innovations of the book is its adaptation of systems of logic to the particular requirements of fallacy theory The book develops logical analyses which take into account such features of real-life cognitive agency as resource- availability and computational complexity The book is also an invitation to interdisciplinary cooperation, linking the relevant branches of logic with computer science, cognitive psychology, neurobiology, forensic science, linguistics, (including conversational analysis and discourse analysis) and argumentation theory Another distinctive feature of Woods’ approach to fallacy theory is its recognition of the highly defeasible character of fallacy-attributions On this view, reasoning is fallacious only in relation to the cognitive target that the reasoner seeks to hit, the standard required for its attainment, and the cognitive resources available to the reasoner Accordingly the so-called Standard Treatment of the fallacies is seriously misconceived Getting the fallacies right is an extremely important task for logic, indeed a central part of its mandate It is a task much more avowed than performed The Death of Argument is a major attempt to redress this inbalanceSpringeroai:cds.cern.ch:16639902004
spellingShingle Mathematical Physics and Mathematics
Woods, John
The death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning
title The death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning
title_full The death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning
title_fullStr The death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning
title_full_unstemmed The death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning
title_short The death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning
title_sort death of argument: fallacies in agent based reasoning
topic Mathematical Physics and Mathematics
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3
http://cds.cern.ch/record/1663990
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsjohn thedeathofargumentfallaciesinagentbasedreasoning
AT woodsjohn deathofargumentfallaciesinagentbasedreasoning