Cargando…
Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really 1st order? (extended version)
The transition between the two phases of 4D Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation [1] was long believed to be of second order until in 1996 first order behavior was found for sufficiently large systems [5,9]. However, one may wonder if this finding was affected by the numerical methods used: to control...
Autores principales: | Rindlisbacher, Tobias, de Forcrand, Philippe |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2015)138 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2001321 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really first order?
por: Rindlisbacher, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Two-flavor lattice QCD with a finite density of heavy quarks: heavy-dense limit and “particle-hole” symmetry
por: Rindlisbacher, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Electromagnetic fluxes, monopoles, and the order of the 4d compact U(1) phase transition
por: Vettorazzo, M, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Oscillating propagators in heavy-dense QCD
por: Akerlund, Oscar, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Sampling of General Correlators in Worm Algorithm-based Simulations
por: Rindlisbacher, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2016)