Cargando…
Decision theory and choices: a complexity approach
In economics agents are assumed to choose on the basis of rational calculations aimed at the maximization of their pleasure or profit. Formally, agents are said to manifest transitive and consistent preferences in attempting to maximize their utility in the presence of several constraints. They oper...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
Springer
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1778-8 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2116670 |
_version_ | 1780949220714348544 |
---|---|
author | Kirman, Alan Faggini, Marisa Vinci, Concetto Paolo |
author_facet | Kirman, Alan Faggini, Marisa Vinci, Concetto Paolo |
author_sort | Kirman, Alan |
collection | CERN |
description | In economics agents are assumed to choose on the basis of rational calculations aimed at the maximization of their pleasure or profit. Formally, agents are said to manifest transitive and consistent preferences in attempting to maximize their utility in the presence of several constraints. They operate according to the choice imperative: given a set of alternatives, choose the best. This imperative works well in a static and simplistic framework, but it may fail or vary when 'the best' is changing continuously. This approach has been questioned by a descriptive approach that springing from the |
id | cern-2116670 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-21166702021-04-21T19:56:33Zdoi:10.1007/978-88-470-1778-8http://cds.cern.ch/record/2116670engKirman, AlanFaggini, MarisaVinci, Concetto PaoloDecision theory and choices: a complexity approachMathematical Physics and MathematicsIn economics agents are assumed to choose on the basis of rational calculations aimed at the maximization of their pleasure or profit. Formally, agents are said to manifest transitive and consistent preferences in attempting to maximize their utility in the presence of several constraints. They operate according to the choice imperative: given a set of alternatives, choose the best. This imperative works well in a static and simplistic framework, but it may fail or vary when 'the best' is changing continuously. This approach has been questioned by a descriptive approach that springing from theSpringeroai:cds.cern.ch:21166702010 |
spellingShingle | Mathematical Physics and Mathematics Kirman, Alan Faggini, Marisa Vinci, Concetto Paolo Decision theory and choices: a complexity approach |
title | Decision theory and choices: a complexity approach |
title_full | Decision theory and choices: a complexity approach |
title_fullStr | Decision theory and choices: a complexity approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision theory and choices: a complexity approach |
title_short | Decision theory and choices: a complexity approach |
title_sort | decision theory and choices: a complexity approach |
topic | Mathematical Physics and Mathematics |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1778-8 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2116670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirmanalan decisiontheoryandchoicesacomplexityapproach AT fagginimarisa decisiontheoryandchoicesacomplexityapproach AT vinciconcettopaolo decisiontheoryandchoicesacomplexityapproach |