Cargando…
A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay?
The J/ψ meson has negative G parity so that, in the limit of isospin conservation, its decay into π+π- should be purely electromagnetic. However, the measured branching fraction B(J/ψ→π+π-) exceeds by more than 4.5 standard deviations the expectation computed according to BABAR data on the e+e-→π+π-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.034038 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2210763 |
_version_ | 1780951826840944640 |
---|---|
author | Ferroli, R. Baldini De Mori, F. Destefanis, M. Maggiora, M. Pacetti, S. Yan, L. Bertani, M. Calcaterra, A. Felici, G. Patteri, P. Wang, Y.D. Zallo, A. Bettoni, D. Cibinetto, G. Farinelli, R. Fioravanti, E. Garzia, I. Mezzadri, G. Santoro, V. Savrié, M. Bianchi, F. Greco, M. Marcello, S. Spataro, S. Carloni Calame, C. M. Montagna, G. Nicrosini, O. Piccinini, F. |
author_facet | Ferroli, R. Baldini De Mori, F. Destefanis, M. Maggiora, M. Pacetti, S. Yan, L. Bertani, M. Calcaterra, A. Felici, G. Patteri, P. Wang, Y.D. Zallo, A. Bettoni, D. Cibinetto, G. Farinelli, R. Fioravanti, E. Garzia, I. Mezzadri, G. Santoro, V. Savrié, M. Bianchi, F. Greco, M. Marcello, S. Spataro, S. Carloni Calame, C. M. Montagna, G. Nicrosini, O. Piccinini, F. |
author_sort | Ferroli, R. Baldini |
collection | CERN |
description | The J/ψ meson has negative G parity so that, in the limit of isospin conservation, its decay into π+π- should be purely electromagnetic. However, the measured branching fraction B(J/ψ→π+π-) exceeds by more than 4.5 standard deviations the expectation computed according to BABAR data on the e+e-→π+π- cross section. The possibility that the two-gluon plus one-photon decay mechanism is not suppressed by G-parity conservation is discussed, even by considering other multipion decay channels. As also obtained by phenomenological computation, such a decay mechanism could be responsible for the observed discrepancy. Finally, we notice that the BESIII experiment, having the potential to perform an accurate measurement of the e+e-→π+π- cross section in the J/ψ mass energy region, can definitely prove or disprove this strong G-parity-violating mechanism by confirming or confuting the BABAR data. |
id | cern-2210763 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-22107632021-05-03T20:31:40Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.034038http://cds.cern.ch/record/2210763engFerroli, R. BaldiniDe Mori, F.Destefanis, M.Maggiora, M.Pacetti, S.Yan, L.Bertani, M.Calcaterra, A.Felici, G.Patteri, P.Wang, Y.D.Zallo, A.Bettoni, D.Cibinetto, G.Farinelli, R.Fioravanti, E.Garzia, I.Mezzadri, G.Santoro, V.Savrié, M.Bianchi, F.Greco, M.Marcello, S.Spataro, S.Carloni Calame, C. M.Montagna, G.Nicrosini, O.Piccinini, F.A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay?hep-phParticle Physics - PhenomenologyThe J/ψ meson has negative G parity so that, in the limit of isospin conservation, its decay into π+π- should be purely electromagnetic. However, the measured branching fraction B(J/ψ→π+π-) exceeds by more than 4.5 standard deviations the expectation computed according to BABAR data on the e+e-→π+π- cross section. The possibility that the two-gluon plus one-photon decay mechanism is not suppressed by G-parity conservation is discussed, even by considering other multipion decay channels. As also obtained by phenomenological computation, such a decay mechanism could be responsible for the observed discrepancy. Finally, we notice that the BESIII experiment, having the potential to perform an accurate measurement of the e+e-→π+π- cross section in the J/ψ mass energy region, can definitely prove or disprove this strong G-parity-violating mechanism by confirming or confuting the BABAR data.The $J/\psi$ meson has negative $G$-parity so that, in the limit of isospin conservation, its decay into $\pi^+\pi^-$ should be purely electromagnetic. However, the measured branching fraction $\mathcal{B}(J/\psi\to\pi^+\pi^-)$ exceeds by more than 3.9 standard deviations the expectation computed according to BaBar data on the $e^+e^-\to\pi^+\pi^-$ cross section. The possibility that the two-gluon plus one-photon decay mechanism is not suppressed by $G$-parity conservation is discussed, even by considering other multi-pion decay channels. As also obtained by phenomenological computation, such a decay mechanism could be responsible for the observed discrepancy. Finally, we notice that the BESIII experiment, having the potential to perform an accurate measurement of the $e^+e^-\to\pi^+\pi^-$ cross section in the 3 GeV energy region, can definitely prove or disprove this strong $G$-parity-violating mechanism by confirming or confuting the BaBar data.arXiv:1608.07191oai:cds.cern.ch:22107632016-08-25 |
spellingShingle | hep-ph Particle Physics - Phenomenology Ferroli, R. Baldini De Mori, F. Destefanis, M. Maggiora, M. Pacetti, S. Yan, L. Bertani, M. Calcaterra, A. Felici, G. Patteri, P. Wang, Y.D. Zallo, A. Bettoni, D. Cibinetto, G. Farinelli, R. Fioravanti, E. Garzia, I. Mezzadri, G. Santoro, V. Savrié, M. Bianchi, F. Greco, M. Marcello, S. Spataro, S. Carloni Calame, C. M. Montagna, G. Nicrosini, O. Piccinini, F. A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay? |
title | A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay? |
title_full | A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay? |
title_fullStr | A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay? |
title_full_unstemmed | A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay? |
title_short | A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\psi$ decay? |
title_sort | new $g$-parity violating amplitude in the $j/\psi$ decay? |
topic | hep-ph Particle Physics - Phenomenology |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.034038 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2210763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrolirbaldini anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT demorif anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT destefanism anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT maggioram anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT pacettis anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT yanl anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT bertanim anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT calcaterraa anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT felicig anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT patterip anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT wangyd anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT zalloa anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT bettonid anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT cibinettog anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT farinellir anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT fioravantie anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT garziai anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT mezzadrig anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT santorov anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT savriem anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT bianchif anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT grecom anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT marcellos anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT spataros anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT carlonicalamecm anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT montagnag anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT nicrosinio anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT piccininif anewgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT ferrolirbaldini newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT demorif newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT destefanism newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT maggioram newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT pacettis newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT yanl newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT bertanim newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT calcaterraa newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT felicig newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT patterip newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT wangyd newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT zalloa newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT bettonid newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT cibinettog newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT farinellir newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT fioravantie newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT garziai newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT mezzadrig newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT santorov newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT savriem newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT bianchif newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT grecom newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT marcellos newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT spataros newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT carlonicalamecm newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT montagnag newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT nicrosinio newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay AT piccininif newgparityviolatingamplitudeinthejpsidecay |