Cargando…

Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider

In this paper, several iron-free solenoid-based designs of a detector magnet for the future circular collider for hadron-hadron collisions (FCC-hh) are presented. The detector magnet designs for FCC-hh aim to provide bending power for particles over a wide pseudorapidity range (0 ≤ jηj ≤ 4). To achi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mentink, Matthias, Dudarev, Alexey, Pais Da Silva, Helder Filipe, Rolando, Gabriella, Cure, Benoit, Gaddi, Andrea, Klyukhin, Slava, Gerwig, Hubert, Wagner, Udo, Ten Kate, Herman
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.111001
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2238521
_version_ 1780952930122203136
author Mentink, Matthias
Dudarev, Alexey
Pais Da Silva, Helder Filipe
Rolando, Gabriella
Cure, Benoit
Gaddi, Andrea
Klyukhin, Slava
Gerwig, Hubert
Wagner, Udo
Ten Kate, Herman
author_facet Mentink, Matthias
Dudarev, Alexey
Pais Da Silva, Helder Filipe
Rolando, Gabriella
Cure, Benoit
Gaddi, Andrea
Klyukhin, Slava
Gerwig, Hubert
Wagner, Udo
Ten Kate, Herman
author_sort Mentink, Matthias
collection CERN
description In this paper, several iron-free solenoid-based designs of a detector magnet for the future circular collider for hadron-hadron collisions (FCC-hh) are presented. The detector magnet designs for FCC-hh aim to provide bending power for particles over a wide pseudorapidity range (0 ≤ jηj ≤ 4). To achieve this goal, the main solenoidal detector magnet is combined with a forward magnet system, such as the previously presented force-and-torque-neutral dipole. Here, a solenoid-based alternative, the so-called balanced forward solenoid, is presented which comprises a larger inner solenoid for providing bending power to particles at jηj ≥ 2.5, in combination with a smaller balancing coil for ensuring that the net force and torque on each individual coil is minimized. The balanced forward solenoid is compared to the force-and-torqueneutral dipole and advantages and disadvantages are discussed. In addition, several conceptual solenoidbased detector magnet designs are shown, and quantitatively compared. The main difference between these designs is the amount of stray field reduction that is achieved. The main conclusion is that shielding coils can be used to dramatically reduce the stray field, but that this comes at the cost of increased complexity, magnet volume, and magnet weight and reduced affordability.
id cern-2238521
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
publishDate 2016
record_format invenio
spelling cern-22385212022-08-10T12:36:17Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.111001http://cds.cern.ch/record/2238521Mentink, MatthiasDudarev, AlexeyPais Da Silva, Helder FilipeRolando, GabriellaCure, BenoitGaddi, AndreaKlyukhin, SlavaGerwig, HubertWagner, UdoTen Kate, HermanIron-free detector magnet options for the future circular colliderAccelerators and Storage RingsIn this paper, several iron-free solenoid-based designs of a detector magnet for the future circular collider for hadron-hadron collisions (FCC-hh) are presented. The detector magnet designs for FCC-hh aim to provide bending power for particles over a wide pseudorapidity range (0 ≤ jηj ≤ 4). To achieve this goal, the main solenoidal detector magnet is combined with a forward magnet system, such as the previously presented force-and-torque-neutral dipole. Here, a solenoid-based alternative, the so-called balanced forward solenoid, is presented which comprises a larger inner solenoid for providing bending power to particles at jηj ≥ 2.5, in combination with a smaller balancing coil for ensuring that the net force and torque on each individual coil is minimized. The balanced forward solenoid is compared to the force-and-torqueneutral dipole and advantages and disadvantages are discussed. In addition, several conceptual solenoidbased detector magnet designs are shown, and quantitatively compared. The main difference between these designs is the amount of stray field reduction that is achieved. The main conclusion is that shielding coils can be used to dramatically reduce the stray field, but that this comes at the cost of increased complexity, magnet volume, and magnet weight and reduced affordability.CERN-ACC-2016-0335oai:cds.cern.ch:22385212016-11-16
spellingShingle Accelerators and Storage Rings
Mentink, Matthias
Dudarev, Alexey
Pais Da Silva, Helder Filipe
Rolando, Gabriella
Cure, Benoit
Gaddi, Andrea
Klyukhin, Slava
Gerwig, Hubert
Wagner, Udo
Ten Kate, Herman
Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider
title Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider
title_full Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider
title_fullStr Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider
title_full_unstemmed Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider
title_short Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider
title_sort iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider
topic Accelerators and Storage Rings
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.111001
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2238521
work_keys_str_mv AT mentinkmatthias ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT dudarevalexey ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT paisdasilvahelderfilipe ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT rolandogabriella ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT curebenoit ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT gaddiandrea ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT klyukhinslava ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT gerwighubert ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT wagnerudo ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider
AT tenkateherman ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider