Cargando…
Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider
In this paper, several iron-free solenoid-based designs of a detector magnet for the future circular collider for hadron-hadron collisions (FCC-hh) are presented. The detector magnet designs for FCC-hh aim to provide bending power for particles over a wide pseudorapidity range (0 ≤ jηj ≤ 4). To achi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.111001 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2238521 |
_version_ | 1780952930122203136 |
---|---|
author | Mentink, Matthias Dudarev, Alexey Pais Da Silva, Helder Filipe Rolando, Gabriella Cure, Benoit Gaddi, Andrea Klyukhin, Slava Gerwig, Hubert Wagner, Udo Ten Kate, Herman |
author_facet | Mentink, Matthias Dudarev, Alexey Pais Da Silva, Helder Filipe Rolando, Gabriella Cure, Benoit Gaddi, Andrea Klyukhin, Slava Gerwig, Hubert Wagner, Udo Ten Kate, Herman |
author_sort | Mentink, Matthias |
collection | CERN |
description | In this paper, several iron-free solenoid-based designs of a detector magnet for the future circular collider for hadron-hadron collisions (FCC-hh) are presented. The detector magnet designs for FCC-hh aim to provide bending power for particles over a wide pseudorapidity range (0 ≤ jηj ≤ 4). To achieve this goal, the main solenoidal detector magnet is combined with a forward magnet system, such as the previously presented force-and-torque-neutral dipole. Here, a solenoid-based alternative, the so-called balanced forward solenoid, is presented which comprises a larger inner solenoid for providing bending power to particles at jηj ≥ 2.5, in combination with a smaller balancing coil for ensuring that the net force and torque on each individual coil is minimized. The balanced forward solenoid is compared to the force-and-torqueneutral dipole and advantages and disadvantages are discussed. In addition, several conceptual solenoidbased detector magnet designs are shown, and quantitatively compared. The main difference between these designs is the amount of stray field reduction that is achieved. The main conclusion is that shielding coils can be used to dramatically reduce the stray field, but that this comes at the cost of increased complexity, magnet volume, and magnet weight and reduced affordability. |
id | cern-2238521 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-22385212022-08-10T12:36:17Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.111001http://cds.cern.ch/record/2238521Mentink, MatthiasDudarev, AlexeyPais Da Silva, Helder FilipeRolando, GabriellaCure, BenoitGaddi, AndreaKlyukhin, SlavaGerwig, HubertWagner, UdoTen Kate, HermanIron-free detector magnet options for the future circular colliderAccelerators and Storage RingsIn this paper, several iron-free solenoid-based designs of a detector magnet for the future circular collider for hadron-hadron collisions (FCC-hh) are presented. The detector magnet designs for FCC-hh aim to provide bending power for particles over a wide pseudorapidity range (0 ≤ jηj ≤ 4). To achieve this goal, the main solenoidal detector magnet is combined with a forward magnet system, such as the previously presented force-and-torque-neutral dipole. Here, a solenoid-based alternative, the so-called balanced forward solenoid, is presented which comprises a larger inner solenoid for providing bending power to particles at jηj ≥ 2.5, in combination with a smaller balancing coil for ensuring that the net force and torque on each individual coil is minimized. The balanced forward solenoid is compared to the force-and-torqueneutral dipole and advantages and disadvantages are discussed. In addition, several conceptual solenoidbased detector magnet designs are shown, and quantitatively compared. The main difference between these designs is the amount of stray field reduction that is achieved. The main conclusion is that shielding coils can be used to dramatically reduce the stray field, but that this comes at the cost of increased complexity, magnet volume, and magnet weight and reduced affordability.CERN-ACC-2016-0335oai:cds.cern.ch:22385212016-11-16 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Mentink, Matthias Dudarev, Alexey Pais Da Silva, Helder Filipe Rolando, Gabriella Cure, Benoit Gaddi, Andrea Klyukhin, Slava Gerwig, Hubert Wagner, Udo Ten Kate, Herman Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider |
title | Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider |
title_full | Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider |
title_fullStr | Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider |
title_full_unstemmed | Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider |
title_short | Iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider |
title_sort | iron-free detector magnet options for the future circular collider |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.111001 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2238521 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mentinkmatthias ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT dudarevalexey ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT paisdasilvahelderfilipe ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT rolandogabriella ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT curebenoit ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT gaddiandrea ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT klyukhinslava ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT gerwighubert ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT wagnerudo ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider AT tenkateherman ironfreedetectormagnetoptionsforthefuturecircularcollider |