Cargando…

Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC

In the frame of the European Circular Collider (EuroCirCol), a conceptual design study for a post-Large Hadron Collider (LHC) research infrastructure based on an energy-frontier 100 TeV circular hadron collider [1]–[3], a cost model for the high-field dipole arc magnets is being developed. The aim o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoerling, Daniel, Durante, Maria, Lorin, Clement, Martinez, Teresa, Ruuskanen, Janne, Salmi, Tiina, Sorbi, Massimo, Tommasini, Davide, Toral, Fernando
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2657510
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2262026
_version_ 1780954082155954176
author Schoerling, Daniel
Durante, Maria
Lorin, Clement
Martinez, Teresa
Ruuskanen, Janne
Salmi, Tiina
Sorbi, Massimo
Tommasini, Davide
Toral, Fernando
author_facet Schoerling, Daniel
Durante, Maria
Lorin, Clement
Martinez, Teresa
Ruuskanen, Janne
Salmi, Tiina
Sorbi, Massimo
Tommasini, Davide
Toral, Fernando
author_sort Schoerling, Daniel
collection CERN
description In the frame of the European Circular Collider (EuroCirCol), a conceptual design study for a post-Large Hadron Collider (LHC) research infrastructure based on an energy-frontier 100 TeV circular hadron collider [1]–[3], a cost model for the high-field dipole arc magnets is being developed. The aim of the cost model in the initial design phase is to provide the basis for sound strategic decisions towards cost effective designs, in particular: (A) the technological choice of superconducting material and its cost, (B) the target performance of Nb$_{3}$Sn superconductor, (C) the choice of operating temperature (D) the relevant design margins and their importance for cost, (E) the nature and extent of grading, and (F) the aperture’s influence on cost. Within the EuroCirCol study three design options for the high field dipole arc magnets are under study: cos − θ [4], block [5], and common-coil [6]. Here, in the advanced design phase, a cost model helps to (1) identify the cost drivers and feed-back this information to the respective magnet designers to make their design as cost effective as possible, (2) compare the optimized design options to each other and make possibly a down-selection of one or two designs. At this stage, we choose to use the cos − θ design option to discuss the main strategic choices. However, the conclusions drawn are equally valid for the other design options. In this paper the results and decisions taken in the initial design phase and the most important cost drivers are discussed.
id cern-2262026
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
publishDate 2017
record_format invenio
spelling cern-22620262019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1109/TASC.2017.2657510http://cds.cern.ch/record/2262026Schoerling, DanielDurante, MariaLorin, ClementMartinez, TeresaRuuskanen, JanneSalmi, TiinaSorbi, MassimoTommasini, DavideToral, FernandoConsiderations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCCAccelerators and Storage RingsIn the frame of the European Circular Collider (EuroCirCol), a conceptual design study for a post-Large Hadron Collider (LHC) research infrastructure based on an energy-frontier 100 TeV circular hadron collider [1]–[3], a cost model for the high-field dipole arc magnets is being developed. The aim of the cost model in the initial design phase is to provide the basis for sound strategic decisions towards cost effective designs, in particular: (A) the technological choice of superconducting material and its cost, (B) the target performance of Nb$_{3}$Sn superconductor, (C) the choice of operating temperature (D) the relevant design margins and their importance for cost, (E) the nature and extent of grading, and (F) the aperture’s influence on cost. Within the EuroCirCol study three design options for the high field dipole arc magnets are under study: cos − θ [4], block [5], and common-coil [6]. Here, in the advanced design phase, a cost model helps to (1) identify the cost drivers and feed-back this information to the respective magnet designers to make their design as cost effective as possible, (2) compare the optimized design options to each other and make possibly a down-selection of one or two designs. At this stage, we choose to use the cos − θ design option to discuss the main strategic choices. However, the conclusions drawn are equally valid for the other design options. In this paper the results and decisions taken in the initial design phase and the most important cost drivers are discussed.CERN-ACC-2017-0027oai:cds.cern.ch:22620262017-01-27
spellingShingle Accelerators and Storage Rings
Schoerling, Daniel
Durante, Maria
Lorin, Clement
Martinez, Teresa
Ruuskanen, Janne
Salmi, Tiina
Sorbi, Massimo
Tommasini, Davide
Toral, Fernando
Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC
title Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC
title_full Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC
title_fullStr Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC
title_full_unstemmed Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC
title_short Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC
title_sort considerations on a cost model for high-field dipole arc magnets for fcc
topic Accelerators and Storage Rings
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2657510
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2262026
work_keys_str_mv AT schoerlingdaniel considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc
AT durantemaria considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc
AT lorinclement considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc
AT martinezteresa considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc
AT ruuskanenjanne considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc
AT salmitiina considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc
AT sorbimassimo considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc
AT tommasinidavide considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc
AT toralfernando considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc