Cargando…
Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC
In the frame of the European Circular Collider (EuroCirCol), a conceptual design study for a post-Large Hadron Collider (LHC) research infrastructure based on an energy-frontier 100 TeV circular hadron collider [1]–[3], a cost model for the high-field dipole arc magnets is being developed. The aim o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2657510 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2262026 |
_version_ | 1780954082155954176 |
---|---|
author | Schoerling, Daniel Durante, Maria Lorin, Clement Martinez, Teresa Ruuskanen, Janne Salmi, Tiina Sorbi, Massimo Tommasini, Davide Toral, Fernando |
author_facet | Schoerling, Daniel Durante, Maria Lorin, Clement Martinez, Teresa Ruuskanen, Janne Salmi, Tiina Sorbi, Massimo Tommasini, Davide Toral, Fernando |
author_sort | Schoerling, Daniel |
collection | CERN |
description | In the frame of the European Circular Collider (EuroCirCol), a conceptual design study for a post-Large Hadron Collider (LHC) research infrastructure based on an energy-frontier 100 TeV circular hadron collider [1]–[3], a cost model for the high-field dipole arc magnets is being developed. The aim of the cost model in the initial design phase is to provide the basis for sound strategic decisions towards cost effective designs, in particular: (A) the technological choice of superconducting material and its cost, (B) the target performance of Nb$_{3}$Sn superconductor, (C) the choice of operating temperature (D) the relevant design margins and their importance for cost, (E) the nature and extent of grading, and (F) the aperture’s influence on cost. Within the EuroCirCol study three design options for the high field dipole arc magnets are under study: cos − θ [4], block [5], and common-coil [6]. Here, in the advanced design phase, a cost model helps to (1) identify the cost drivers and feed-back this information to the respective magnet designers to make their design as cost effective as possible, (2) compare the optimized design options to each other and make possibly a down-selection of one or two designs. At this stage, we choose to use the cos − θ design option to discuss the main strategic choices. However, the conclusions drawn are equally valid for the other design options. In this paper the results and decisions taken in the initial design phase and the most important cost drivers are discussed. |
id | cern-2262026 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-22620262019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1109/TASC.2017.2657510http://cds.cern.ch/record/2262026Schoerling, DanielDurante, MariaLorin, ClementMartinez, TeresaRuuskanen, JanneSalmi, TiinaSorbi, MassimoTommasini, DavideToral, FernandoConsiderations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCCAccelerators and Storage RingsIn the frame of the European Circular Collider (EuroCirCol), a conceptual design study for a post-Large Hadron Collider (LHC) research infrastructure based on an energy-frontier 100 TeV circular hadron collider [1]–[3], a cost model for the high-field dipole arc magnets is being developed. The aim of the cost model in the initial design phase is to provide the basis for sound strategic decisions towards cost effective designs, in particular: (A) the technological choice of superconducting material and its cost, (B) the target performance of Nb$_{3}$Sn superconductor, (C) the choice of operating temperature (D) the relevant design margins and their importance for cost, (E) the nature and extent of grading, and (F) the aperture’s influence on cost. Within the EuroCirCol study three design options for the high field dipole arc magnets are under study: cos − θ [4], block [5], and common-coil [6]. Here, in the advanced design phase, a cost model helps to (1) identify the cost drivers and feed-back this information to the respective magnet designers to make their design as cost effective as possible, (2) compare the optimized design options to each other and make possibly a down-selection of one or two designs. At this stage, we choose to use the cos − θ design option to discuss the main strategic choices. However, the conclusions drawn are equally valid for the other design options. In this paper the results and decisions taken in the initial design phase and the most important cost drivers are discussed.CERN-ACC-2017-0027oai:cds.cern.ch:22620262017-01-27 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Schoerling, Daniel Durante, Maria Lorin, Clement Martinez, Teresa Ruuskanen, Janne Salmi, Tiina Sorbi, Massimo Tommasini, Davide Toral, Fernando Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC |
title | Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC |
title_full | Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC |
title_fullStr | Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC |
title_full_unstemmed | Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC |
title_short | Considerations on a Cost Model for High-Field Dipole Arc Magnets for FCC |
title_sort | considerations on a cost model for high-field dipole arc magnets for fcc |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2017.2657510 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2262026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schoerlingdaniel considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc AT durantemaria considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc AT lorinclement considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc AT martinezteresa considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc AT ruuskanenjanne considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc AT salmitiina considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc AT sorbimassimo considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc AT tommasinidavide considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc AT toralfernando considerationsonacostmodelforhighfielddipolearcmagnetsforfcc |