Cargando…

Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934

In 1920s, a long-lasting controversy on the interpretation of nuclear beta spectrum arose between Lise Meitner and Charles Drummond Ellis. This controversy, and the reactions from the contending parties when it was settled, reflect clearly the difference between the scientific communities in Berlin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jensen, Carsten
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: Springer 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8444-0
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2302930
_version_ 1780957307774959616
author Jensen, Carsten
author_facet Jensen, Carsten
author_sort Jensen, Carsten
collection CERN
description In 1920s, a long-lasting controversy on the interpretation of nuclear beta spectrum arose between Lise Meitner and Charles Drummond Ellis. This controversy, and the reactions from the contending parties when it was settled, reflect clearly the difference between the scientific communities in Berlin and Cambridge at that time. The Meitner-Ellis controversy ended in 1929, and it left an anomaly that attracted leading theoretical physicists. A new dispute, this time between Niels Bohr and Wolfgang Pauli, broke out. It concerned the explanation of the continuity of the primary beta particles and dominated the discussions for the next five years. Pauli argued for a new particle, and Bohr for a new theory; both suggestions were radical steps, but they reflected two different ways of doing physics.
id cern-2302930
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2000
publisher Springer
record_format invenio
spelling cern-23029302021-04-21T18:55:29Zdoi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8444-0http://cds.cern.ch/record/2302930engJensen, CarstenControversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934Biography, Geography, HistoryIn 1920s, a long-lasting controversy on the interpretation of nuclear beta spectrum arose between Lise Meitner and Charles Drummond Ellis. This controversy, and the reactions from the contending parties when it was settled, reflect clearly the difference between the scientific communities in Berlin and Cambridge at that time. The Meitner-Ellis controversy ended in 1929, and it left an anomaly that attracted leading theoretical physicists. A new dispute, this time between Niels Bohr and Wolfgang Pauli, broke out. It concerned the explanation of the continuity of the primary beta particles and dominated the discussions for the next five years. Pauli argued for a new particle, and Bohr for a new theory; both suggestions were radical steps, but they reflected two different ways of doing physics.Springeroai:cds.cern.ch:23029302000
spellingShingle Biography, Geography, History
Jensen, Carsten
Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934
title Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934
title_full Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934
title_fullStr Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934
title_full_unstemmed Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934
title_short Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934
title_sort controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911-1934
topic Biography, Geography, History
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8444-0
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2302930
work_keys_str_mv AT jensencarsten controversyandconsensusnuclearbetadecay19111934