Cargando…
A rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{B}$
The $B$-meson decay constant can be measured on the lattice using a $1/m_b$ expansion. To relate the physical quantity to Monte Carlo data one has to know the renormalization coefficient, $Z$, between the lattice operators and their continuum counterparts. We come back to this computation to resolve...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
1993
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1206 http://cds.cern.ch/record/239608 |
_version_ | 1780884859117371392 |
---|---|
author | Boucaud, Philippe Leroy, J.P. Micheli, J. Pene, O. Rossi, G.C. |
author_facet | Boucaud, Philippe Leroy, J.P. Micheli, J. Pene, O. Rossi, G.C. |
author_sort | Boucaud, Philippe |
collection | CERN |
description | The $B$-meson decay constant can be measured on the lattice using a $1/m_b$ expansion. To relate the physical quantity to Monte Carlo data one has to know the renormalization coefficient, $Z$, between the lattice operators and their continuum counterparts. We come back to this computation to resolve discrepancies found in previous calculations. We define and discuss in detail the renormalization procedure that allows the (perturbative) computation of $Z$. Comparing the one-loop calculations in the effective Lagrangian approach with the direct two-loop calculation of the two-point $B$-meson correlator in the limit of large $b$-quark mass, we prove that the two schemes give consistent results to order $\alpha_s$. We show that there is, however, a renormalization prescription ambiguity that can have sizeable numerical consequences. This ambiguity can be resolved in the framework of an $O(a)$ improved calculation, and we describe the correct prescription in that case. Finally we give the numerical values of $Z$ that correspond to the different types of lattice approximations discussed in the paper. |
id | cern-239608 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 1993 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-2396082023-03-14T20:45:49Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1206http://cds.cern.ch/record/239608engBoucaud, PhilippeLeroy, J.P.Micheli, J.Pene, O.Rossi, G.C.A rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{B}$Particle Physics - TheoryThe $B$-meson decay constant can be measured on the lattice using a $1/m_b$ expansion. To relate the physical quantity to Monte Carlo data one has to know the renormalization coefficient, $Z$, between the lattice operators and their continuum counterparts. We come back to this computation to resolve discrepancies found in previous calculations. We define and discuss in detail the renormalization procedure that allows the (perturbative) computation of $Z$. Comparing the one-loop calculations in the effective Lagrangian approach with the direct two-loop calculation of the two-point $B$-meson correlator in the limit of large $b$-quark mass, we prove that the two schemes give consistent results to order $\alpha_s$. We show that there is, however, a renormalization prescription ambiguity that can have sizeable numerical consequences. This ambiguity can be resolved in the framework of an $O(a)$ improved calculation, and we describe the correct prescription in that case. Finally we give the numerical values of $Z$ that correspond to the different types of lattice approximations discussed in the paper.The $B$-meson decay constant can be measured on the lattice using a $1/m_b$ expansion. To relate the physical quantity to Monte Carlo data one has to know the renormalization coefficient, $Z$, between the lattice operators and their continuum counterparts. We come back to this computation to resolve discrepancies found in previous calculations. We define and discuss in detail the renormalization procedure that allows the (perturbative) computation of $Z$. Comparing the one-loop calculations in the effective Lagrangian approach with the direct two-loop calculation of the two-point $B$-meson correlator in the limit of large $b$-quark mass, we prove that the two schemes give consistent results to order $\alpha_s$. We show that there is, however, a renormalization prescription ambiguity that can have sizeable numerical consequences. This ambiguity can be resolved in the framework of an $O(a)$ improved calculation, and we describe the correct prescription in that case. Finally we give the numerical values of $Z$ that correspond to the different types of lattice approximations discussed in the paper.hep-lat/9208004CERN-TH-6599-92PAR-LPTHE-92-45AROM2F-92-43CERN-TH-6599-92LPTHE-92-45ROM-2F-92-43oai:cds.cern.ch:2396081993 |
spellingShingle | Particle Physics - Theory Boucaud, Philippe Leroy, J.P. Micheli, J. Pene, O. Rossi, G.C. A rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{B}$ |
title | A rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{B}$ |
title_full | A rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{B}$ |
title_fullStr | A rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{B}$ |
title_full_unstemmed | A rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{B}$ |
title_short | A rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{B}$ |
title_sort | rigorous treatment of the lattice renormalization problem of f$_{b}$ |
topic | Particle Physics - Theory |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1206 http://cds.cern.ch/record/239608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boucaudphilippe arigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT leroyjp arigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT michelij arigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT peneo arigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT rossigc arigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT boucaudphilippe rigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT leroyjp rigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT michelij rigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT peneo rigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb AT rossigc rigoroustreatmentofthelatticerenormalizationproblemoffb |