Cargando…

Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors

Low Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n<math id="mml32" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p<math i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kramberger, G., Carulla, M., Cavallaro, E., Cindro, V., Flores, D., Galloway, Z., Grinstein, S., Hidalgo, S., Fadeyev, V., Lange, J., Mandić, I., Medin, G., Merlos, A., McKinney-Martinez, F., Mikuž, M., Quirion, D., Pellegrini, G., Petek, M., Sadrozinski, H.F.-W., Seiden, A., Zavrtanik, M.
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633858
_version_ 1780959658622582784
author Kramberger, G.
Carulla, M.
Cavallaro, E.
Cindro, V.
Flores, D.
Galloway, Z.
Grinstein, S.
Hidalgo, S.
Fadeyev, V.
Lange, J.
Mandić, I.
Medin, G.
Merlos, A.
McKinney-Martinez, F.
Mikuž, M.
Quirion, D.
Pellegrini, G.
Petek, M.
Sadrozinski, H.F.-W.
Seiden, A.
Zavrtanik, M.
author_facet Kramberger, G.
Carulla, M.
Cavallaro, E.
Cindro, V.
Flores, D.
Galloway, Z.
Grinstein, S.
Hidalgo, S.
Fadeyev, V.
Lange, J.
Mandić, I.
Medin, G.
Merlos, A.
McKinney-Martinez, F.
Mikuž, M.
Quirion, D.
Pellegrini, G.
Petek, M.
Sadrozinski, H.F.-W.
Seiden, A.
Zavrtanik, M.
author_sort Kramberger, G.
collection CERN
description Low Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n<math id="mml32" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p<math id="mml33" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si33.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p-p<math id="mml34" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math> structure where an appropriate doping of the multiplication layer (p<math id="mml35" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si33.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>) leads to high enough electric fields for impact ionization. Gain factors of few tens in charge significantly improve the resolution of timing measurements, particularly for thin detectors, where the timing performance was shown to be limited by Landau fluctuations. The main obstacle for their operation is the decrease of gain with irradiation, attributed to effective acceptor removal in the gain layer. Sets of thin sensors were produced by two different producers on different substrates, with different gain layer doping profiles and thicknesses (45, 50 and 80 <math id="mml36" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si3.gif"><mi mathvariant="normal">μ</mi></math>m). Their performance in terms of gain/collected charge and leakage current was compared before and after irradiation with neutrons and pions up to the equivalent fluences of <math id="mml37" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si37.gif"><mn>5</mn><mo>⋅</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>15</mn></mrow></msup></math> cm<sup loc="post">−2</sup>. Transient Current Technique and charge collection measurements with LHC speed electronics were employed to characterize the detectors. The thin LGAD sensors were shown to perform much better than sensors of standard thickness (<math id="mml38" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si38.gif"><mo>∼</mo></math>300 <math id="mml39" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si3.gif"><mi mathvariant="normal">μ</mi></math>m) and offer larger charge collection with respect to detectors without gain layer for fluences <math id="mml40" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si40.gif"><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>⋅</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>15</mn></mrow></msup></math> cm<sup loc="post">−2</sup>. Larger initial gain prolongs the beneficial performance of LGADs. Pions were found to be more damaging than neutrons at the same equivalent fluence, while no significant difference was found between different producers. At very high fluences and bias voltages the gain appears due to deep acceptors in the bulk, hence also in thin standard detectors.
id cern-2633858
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2017
record_format invenio
spelling cern-26338582023-06-29T04:23:50Zdoi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633858engKramberger, G.Carulla, M.Cavallaro, E.Cindro, V.Flores, D.Galloway, Z.Grinstein, S.Hidalgo, S.Fadeyev, V.Lange, J.Mandić, I.Medin, G.Merlos, A.McKinney-Martinez, F.Mikuž, M.Quirion, D.Pellegrini, G.Petek, M.Sadrozinski, H.F.-W.Seiden, A.Zavrtanik, M.Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectorshep-exParticle Physics - Experimentphysics.ins-detDetectors and Experimental TechniquesLow Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n<math id="mml32" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p<math id="mml33" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si33.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p-p<math id="mml34" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math> structure where an appropriate doping of the multiplication layer (p<math id="mml35" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si33.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>) leads to high enough electric fields for impact ionization. Gain factors of few tens in charge significantly improve the resolution of timing measurements, particularly for thin detectors, where the timing performance was shown to be limited by Landau fluctuations. The main obstacle for their operation is the decrease of gain with irradiation, attributed to effective acceptor removal in the gain layer. Sets of thin sensors were produced by two different producers on different substrates, with different gain layer doping profiles and thicknesses (45, 50 and 80 <math id="mml36" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si3.gif"><mi mathvariant="normal">μ</mi></math>m). Their performance in terms of gain/collected charge and leakage current was compared before and after irradiation with neutrons and pions up to the equivalent fluences of <math id="mml37" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si37.gif"><mn>5</mn><mo>⋅</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>15</mn></mrow></msup></math> cm<sup loc="post">−2</sup>. Transient Current Technique and charge collection measurements with LHC speed electronics were employed to characterize the detectors. The thin LGAD sensors were shown to perform much better than sensors of standard thickness (<math id="mml38" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si38.gif"><mo>∼</mo></math>300 <math id="mml39" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si3.gif"><mi mathvariant="normal">μ</mi></math>m) and offer larger charge collection with respect to detectors without gain layer for fluences <math id="mml40" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si40.gif"><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>⋅</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>15</mn></mrow></msup></math> cm<sup loc="post">−2</sup>. Larger initial gain prolongs the beneficial performance of LGADs. Pions were found to be more damaging than neutrons at the same equivalent fluence, while no significant difference was found between different producers. At very high fluences and bias voltages the gain appears due to deep acceptors in the bulk, hence also in thin standard detectors.Low Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n ++ -p + -p-p ++ structure where an appropriate doping of the multiplication layer (p + ) leads to high enough electric fields for impact ionization. Gain factors of few tens in charge significantly improve the resolution of timing measurements, particularly for thin detectors, where the timing performance was shown to be limited by Landau fluctuations. The main obstacle for their operation is the decrease of gain with irradiation, attributed to effective acceptor removal in the gain layer. Sets of thin sensors were produced by two different producers on different substrates, with different gain layer doping profiles and thicknesses (45, 50 and 80  μ m). Their performance in terms of gain/collected charge and leakage current was compared before and after irradiation with neutrons and pions up to the equivalent fluences of 5⋅1015 cm −2 . Transient Current Technique and charge collection measurements with LHC speed electronics were employed to characterize the detectors. The thin LGAD sensors were shown to perform much better than sensors of standard thickness ( ∼ 300  μ m) and offer larger charge collection with respect to detectors without gain layer for fluences <2⋅1015  cm −2 . Larger initial gain prolongs the beneficial performance of LGADs. Pions were found to be more damaging than neutrons at the same equivalent fluence, while no significant difference was found between different producers. At very high fluences and bias voltages the gain appears due to deep acceptors in the bulk, hence also in thin standard detectors.Low Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n++-p+-p-p++ structure where an appropriate doping of the multiplication layer (p+) leads to high enough electric fields for impact ionization. Gain factors of few tens in charge significantly improve the resolution of timing measurements, particularly for thin detectors, where the timing performance was shown to be limited by Landau fluctuations. The main obstacle for their operation is the decrease of gain with irradiation, attributed to effective acceptor removal in the gain layer. Sets of thin sensors were produced by two different producers on different substrates, with different gain layer doping profiles and thicknesses (45, 50 and 80 um). Their performance in terms of gain/collected charge and leakage current was compared before and after irradiation with neutrons and pions up to the equivalent fluences of 5e15 cm-2. Transient Current Technique and charge collection measurements with LHC speed electronics were employed to characterize the detectors. The thin LGAD sensors were shown to perform much better than sensors of standard thickness (~300 um) and offer larger charge collection with respect to detectors without gain layer for fluences <2e15 cm-2. Larger initial gain prolongs the beneficial performance of LGADs. Pions were found to be more damaging than neutrons at the same equivalent fluence, while no significant difference was found between different producers. At very high fluences and bias voltages the gain appears due to deep acceptors in the bulk, hence also in thin standard detectors.arXiv:1711.06003oai:cds.cern.ch:26338582017-11-16
spellingShingle hep-ex
Particle Physics - Experiment
physics.ins-det
Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Kramberger, G.
Carulla, M.
Cavallaro, E.
Cindro, V.
Flores, D.
Galloway, Z.
Grinstein, S.
Hidalgo, S.
Fadeyev, V.
Lange, J.
Mandić, I.
Medin, G.
Merlos, A.
McKinney-Martinez, F.
Mikuž, M.
Quirion, D.
Pellegrini, G.
Petek, M.
Sadrozinski, H.F.-W.
Seiden, A.
Zavrtanik, M.
Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors
title Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors
title_full Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors
title_fullStr Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors
title_full_unstemmed Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors
title_short Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors
title_sort radiation hardness of thin low gain avalanche detectors
topic hep-ex
Particle Physics - Experiment
physics.ins-det
Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633858
work_keys_str_mv AT krambergerg radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT carullam radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT cavallaroe radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT cindrov radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT floresd radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT gallowayz radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT grinsteins radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT hidalgos radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT fadeyevv radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT langej radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT mandici radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT meding radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT merlosa radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT mckinneymartinezf radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT mikuzm radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT quiriond radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT pellegrinig radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT petekm radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT sadrozinskihfw radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT seidena radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors
AT zavrtanikm radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors