Cargando…
Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors
Low Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n<math id="mml32" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p<math i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633858 |
_version_ | 1780959658622582784 |
---|---|
author | Kramberger, G. Carulla, M. Cavallaro, E. Cindro, V. Flores, D. Galloway, Z. Grinstein, S. Hidalgo, S. Fadeyev, V. Lange, J. Mandić, I. Medin, G. Merlos, A. McKinney-Martinez, F. Mikuž, M. Quirion, D. Pellegrini, G. Petek, M. Sadrozinski, H.F.-W. Seiden, A. Zavrtanik, M. |
author_facet | Kramberger, G. Carulla, M. Cavallaro, E. Cindro, V. Flores, D. Galloway, Z. Grinstein, S. Hidalgo, S. Fadeyev, V. Lange, J. Mandić, I. Medin, G. Merlos, A. McKinney-Martinez, F. Mikuž, M. Quirion, D. Pellegrini, G. Petek, M. Sadrozinski, H.F.-W. Seiden, A. Zavrtanik, M. |
author_sort | Kramberger, G. |
collection | CERN |
description | Low Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n<math id="mml32" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p<math id="mml33" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si33.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p-p<math id="mml34" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math> structure where an appropriate doping of the multiplication layer (p<math id="mml35" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si33.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>) leads to high enough electric fields for impact ionization. Gain factors of few tens in charge significantly improve the resolution of timing measurements, particularly for thin detectors, where the timing performance was shown to be limited by Landau fluctuations. The main obstacle for their operation is the decrease of gain with irradiation, attributed to effective acceptor removal in the gain layer. Sets of thin sensors were produced by two different producers on different substrates, with different gain layer doping profiles and thicknesses (45, 50 and 80 <math id="mml36" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si3.gif"><mi mathvariant="normal">μ</mi></math>m). Their performance in terms of gain/collected charge and leakage current was compared before and after irradiation with neutrons and pions up to the equivalent fluences of <math id="mml37" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si37.gif"><mn>5</mn><mo>⋅</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>15</mn></mrow></msup></math> cm<sup loc="post">−2</sup>. Transient Current Technique and charge collection measurements with LHC speed electronics were employed to characterize the detectors. The thin LGAD sensors were shown to perform much better than sensors of standard thickness (<math id="mml38" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si38.gif"><mo>∼</mo></math>300 <math id="mml39" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si3.gif"><mi mathvariant="normal">μ</mi></math>m) and offer larger charge collection with respect to detectors without gain layer for fluences <math id="mml40" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si40.gif"><mo><</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>⋅</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>15</mn></mrow></msup></math> cm<sup loc="post">−2</sup>. Larger initial gain prolongs the beneficial performance of LGADs. Pions were found to be more damaging than neutrons at the same equivalent fluence, while no significant difference was found between different producers. At very high fluences and bias voltages the gain appears due to deep acceptors in the bulk, hence also in thin standard detectors. |
id | cern-2633858 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-26338582023-06-29T04:23:50Zdoi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633858engKramberger, G.Carulla, M.Cavallaro, E.Cindro, V.Flores, D.Galloway, Z.Grinstein, S.Hidalgo, S.Fadeyev, V.Lange, J.Mandić, I.Medin, G.Merlos, A.McKinney-Martinez, F.Mikuž, M.Quirion, D.Pellegrini, G.Petek, M.Sadrozinski, H.F.-W.Seiden, A.Zavrtanik, M.Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectorshep-exParticle Physics - Experimentphysics.ins-detDetectors and Experimental TechniquesLow Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n<math id="mml32" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p<math id="mml33" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si33.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>-p-p<math id="mml34" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si32.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math> structure where an appropriate doping of the multiplication layer (p<math id="mml35" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si33.gif"><msup><mrow/><mrow><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math>) leads to high enough electric fields for impact ionization. Gain factors of few tens in charge significantly improve the resolution of timing measurements, particularly for thin detectors, where the timing performance was shown to be limited by Landau fluctuations. The main obstacle for their operation is the decrease of gain with irradiation, attributed to effective acceptor removal in the gain layer. Sets of thin sensors were produced by two different producers on different substrates, with different gain layer doping profiles and thicknesses (45, 50 and 80 <math id="mml36" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si3.gif"><mi mathvariant="normal">μ</mi></math>m). Their performance in terms of gain/collected charge and leakage current was compared before and after irradiation with neutrons and pions up to the equivalent fluences of <math id="mml37" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si37.gif"><mn>5</mn><mo>⋅</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>15</mn></mrow></msup></math> cm<sup loc="post">−2</sup>. Transient Current Technique and charge collection measurements with LHC speed electronics were employed to characterize the detectors. The thin LGAD sensors were shown to perform much better than sensors of standard thickness (<math id="mml38" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si38.gif"><mo>∼</mo></math>300 <math id="mml39" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si3.gif"><mi mathvariant="normal">μ</mi></math>m) and offer larger charge collection with respect to detectors without gain layer for fluences <math id="mml40" display="inline" overflow="scroll" altimg="si40.gif"><mo><</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>⋅</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mn>15</mn></mrow></msup></math> cm<sup loc="post">−2</sup>. Larger initial gain prolongs the beneficial performance of LGADs. Pions were found to be more damaging than neutrons at the same equivalent fluence, while no significant difference was found between different producers. At very high fluences and bias voltages the gain appears due to deep acceptors in the bulk, hence also in thin standard detectors.Low Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n ++ -p + -p-p ++ structure where an appropriate doping of the multiplication layer (p + ) leads to high enough electric fields for impact ionization. Gain factors of few tens in charge significantly improve the resolution of timing measurements, particularly for thin detectors, where the timing performance was shown to be limited by Landau fluctuations. The main obstacle for their operation is the decrease of gain with irradiation, attributed to effective acceptor removal in the gain layer. Sets of thin sensors were produced by two different producers on different substrates, with different gain layer doping profiles and thicknesses (45, 50 and 80 μ m). Their performance in terms of gain/collected charge and leakage current was compared before and after irradiation with neutrons and pions up to the equivalent fluences of 5⋅1015 cm −2 . Transient Current Technique and charge collection measurements with LHC speed electronics were employed to characterize the detectors. The thin LGAD sensors were shown to perform much better than sensors of standard thickness ( ∼ 300 μ m) and offer larger charge collection with respect to detectors without gain layer for fluences <2⋅1015 cm −2 . Larger initial gain prolongs the beneficial performance of LGADs. Pions were found to be more damaging than neutrons at the same equivalent fluence, while no significant difference was found between different producers. At very high fluences and bias voltages the gain appears due to deep acceptors in the bulk, hence also in thin standard detectors.Low Gain Avalanche Detectors (LGAD) are based on a n++-p+-p-p++ structure where an appropriate doping of the multiplication layer (p+) leads to high enough electric fields for impact ionization. Gain factors of few tens in charge significantly improve the resolution of timing measurements, particularly for thin detectors, where the timing performance was shown to be limited by Landau fluctuations. The main obstacle for their operation is the decrease of gain with irradiation, attributed to effective acceptor removal in the gain layer. Sets of thin sensors were produced by two different producers on different substrates, with different gain layer doping profiles and thicknesses (45, 50 and 80 um). Their performance in terms of gain/collected charge and leakage current was compared before and after irradiation with neutrons and pions up to the equivalent fluences of 5e15 cm-2. Transient Current Technique and charge collection measurements with LHC speed electronics were employed to characterize the detectors. The thin LGAD sensors were shown to perform much better than sensors of standard thickness (~300 um) and offer larger charge collection with respect to detectors without gain layer for fluences <2e15 cm-2. Larger initial gain prolongs the beneficial performance of LGADs. Pions were found to be more damaging than neutrons at the same equivalent fluence, while no significant difference was found between different producers. At very high fluences and bias voltages the gain appears due to deep acceptors in the bulk, hence also in thin standard detectors.arXiv:1711.06003oai:cds.cern.ch:26338582017-11-16 |
spellingShingle | hep-ex Particle Physics - Experiment physics.ins-det Detectors and Experimental Techniques Kramberger, G. Carulla, M. Cavallaro, E. Cindro, V. Flores, D. Galloway, Z. Grinstein, S. Hidalgo, S. Fadeyev, V. Lange, J. Mandić, I. Medin, G. Merlos, A. McKinney-Martinez, F. Mikuž, M. Quirion, D. Pellegrini, G. Petek, M. Sadrozinski, H.F.-W. Seiden, A. Zavrtanik, M. Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors |
title | Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors |
title_full | Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors |
title_fullStr | Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors |
title_short | Radiation Hardness of Thin Low Gain Avalanche Detectors |
title_sort | radiation hardness of thin low gain avalanche detectors |
topic | hep-ex Particle Physics - Experiment physics.ins-det Detectors and Experimental Techniques |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.02.018 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633858 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krambergerg radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT carullam radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT cavallaroe radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT cindrov radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT floresd radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT gallowayz radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT grinsteins radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT hidalgos radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT fadeyevv radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT langej radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT mandici radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT meding radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT merlosa radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT mckinneymartinezf radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT mikuzm radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT quiriond radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT pellegrinig radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT petekm radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT sadrozinskihfw radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT seidena radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors AT zavrtanikm radiationhardnessofthinlowgainavalanchedetectors |