Cargando…

Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2

The luminosity measurement of the CMS experiment is calibrated with Van der Meer (VdM) scans in special LHC fills. From two such scans in orthogonal directions (along the $x$ and $y$ axis of the CMS coordinate system), the overlap area of the proton density of the two beams is measured. This method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: CMS Collaboration
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/2681801
_version_ 1780963057177985024
author CMS Collaboration
author_facet CMS Collaboration
author_sort CMS Collaboration
collection CERN
description The luminosity measurement of the CMS experiment is calibrated with Van der Meer (VdM) scans in special LHC fills. From two such scans in orthogonal directions (along the $x$ and $y$ axis of the CMS coordinate system), the overlap area of the proton density of the two beams is measured. This method neglects possible correlations between the $x$ and $y$ dependence of the beam proton densities, leading to a bias of the VdM measurement. In Run~2, the CMS experiment employed four different methods to assess the size of this nonfactorization bias and to derive a correction on the VdM result: The beam imaging method, the offset scan analysis, the diagonal scan analysis, and the beamspot evolution analysis. This note presents performance results of all four methods.
id cern-2681801
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2019
record_format invenio
spelling cern-26818012019-09-30T06:29:59Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2681801engCMS CollaborationNonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2Detectors and Experimental TechniquesThe luminosity measurement of the CMS experiment is calibrated with Van der Meer (VdM) scans in special LHC fills. From two such scans in orthogonal directions (along the $x$ and $y$ axis of the CMS coordinate system), the overlap area of the proton density of the two beams is measured. This method neglects possible correlations between the $x$ and $y$ dependence of the beam proton densities, leading to a bias of the VdM measurement. In Run~2, the CMS experiment employed four different methods to assess the size of this nonfactorization bias and to derive a correction on the VdM result: The beam imaging method, the offset scan analysis, the diagonal scan analysis, and the beamspot evolution analysis. This note presents performance results of all four methods.CMS-DP-2019-019CERN-CMS-DP-2019-019oai:cds.cern.ch:26818012019-06-06
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
CMS Collaboration
Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2
title Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2
title_full Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2
title_fullStr Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2
title_full_unstemmed Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2
title_short Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2
title_sort nonfactorization in van der meer scans in run 2
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/2681801
work_keys_str_mv AT cmscollaboration nonfactorizationinvandermeerscansinrun2