Cargando…
Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2
The luminosity measurement of the CMS experiment is calibrated with Van der Meer (VdM) scans in special LHC fills. From two such scans in orthogonal directions (along the $x$ and $y$ axis of the CMS coordinate system), the overlap area of the proton density of the two beams is measured. This method...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/2681801 |
_version_ | 1780963057177985024 |
---|---|
author | CMS Collaboration |
author_facet | CMS Collaboration |
author_sort | CMS Collaboration |
collection | CERN |
description | The luminosity measurement of the CMS experiment is calibrated with Van der Meer (VdM) scans in special LHC fills. From two such scans in orthogonal directions (along the $x$ and $y$ axis of the CMS coordinate system), the overlap area of the proton density of the two beams is measured. This method neglects possible correlations between the $x$ and $y$ dependence of the beam proton densities, leading to a bias of the VdM measurement. In Run~2, the CMS experiment employed four different methods to assess the size of this nonfactorization bias and to derive a correction on the VdM result: The beam imaging method, the offset scan analysis, the diagonal scan analysis, and the beamspot evolution analysis. This note presents performance results of all four methods. |
id | cern-2681801 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-26818012019-09-30T06:29:59Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2681801engCMS CollaborationNonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2Detectors and Experimental TechniquesThe luminosity measurement of the CMS experiment is calibrated with Van der Meer (VdM) scans in special LHC fills. From two such scans in orthogonal directions (along the $x$ and $y$ axis of the CMS coordinate system), the overlap area of the proton density of the two beams is measured. This method neglects possible correlations between the $x$ and $y$ dependence of the beam proton densities, leading to a bias of the VdM measurement. In Run~2, the CMS experiment employed four different methods to assess the size of this nonfactorization bias and to derive a correction on the VdM result: The beam imaging method, the offset scan analysis, the diagonal scan analysis, and the beamspot evolution analysis. This note presents performance results of all four methods.CMS-DP-2019-019CERN-CMS-DP-2019-019oai:cds.cern.ch:26818012019-06-06 |
spellingShingle | Detectors and Experimental Techniques CMS Collaboration Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2 |
title | Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2 |
title_full | Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2 |
title_fullStr | Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2 |
title_short | Nonfactorization in Van der Meer scans in Run 2 |
title_sort | nonfactorization in van der meer scans in run 2 |
topic | Detectors and Experimental Techniques |
url | http://cds.cern.ch/record/2681801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cmscollaboration nonfactorizationinvandermeerscansinrun2 |