Cargando…
Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure
An axion-like field comprising ∼10% of the energy density of the Universe near matter-radiation equality is a candidate to resolve the Hubble tension; this is the “early dark energy” (EDE) model. However, as shown in Hill et al., the model fails to simultaneously resolve the Hubble tension and maint...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103502 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2723281 |
_version_ | 1780965936548806656 |
---|---|
author | Ivanov, Mikhail M. McDonough, Evan Hill, J. Colin Simonović, Marko Toomey, Michael W. Alexander, Stephon Zaldarriaga, Matias |
author_facet | Ivanov, Mikhail M. McDonough, Evan Hill, J. Colin Simonović, Marko Toomey, Michael W. Alexander, Stephon Zaldarriaga, Matias |
author_sort | Ivanov, Mikhail M. |
collection | CERN |
description | An axion-like field comprising ∼10% of the energy density of the Universe near matter-radiation equality is a candidate to resolve the Hubble tension; this is the “early dark energy” (EDE) model. However, as shown in Hill et al., the model fails to simultaneously resolve the Hubble tension and maintain a good fit to both cosmic microwave background (CMB) and large-scale structure (LSS) data. Here, we use redshift-space galaxy clustering data to sharpen constraints on the EDE model. We perform the first EDE analysis using the full-shape power spectrum likelihood from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), based on the effective field theory (EFT) of LSS. The inclusion of this likelihood in the EDE analysis yields a 25% tighter error bar on H0 compared to primary CMB data alone, yielding H0=68.54-0.95+0.52 km/s/Mpc (68% C.L.). In addition, we constrain the maximum fractional energy density contribution of the EDE to fEDE<0.072 (95% C.L.). We explicitly demonstrate that the EFT BOSS likelihood yields much stronger constraints on EDE than the standard BOSS likelihood. Including further information from photometric LSS surveys,the constraints narrow by an additional 20%, yielding H0=68.73-0.69+0.42 km/s/Mpc (68% C.L.) and fEDE<0.053 (95% C.L.). These bounds are obtained without including local-Universe H0 data, which is in strong tension with the CMB and LSS, even in the EDE model. We also refute claims that Markov-chain Monte Carlo analyses of EDE that omit SH0ES from the combined dataset yield misleading posteriors. Finally, we show that upcoming Euclid/DESI-like spectroscopic galaxy surveys will greatly improve the EDE constraints. We conclude that current data preclude the EDE model as a resolution of the Hubble tension, and that future LSS surveys can close the remaining parameter space of this model. |
id | cern-2723281 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-27232812022-06-27T02:19:04Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103502http://cds.cern.ch/record/2723281engIvanov, Mikhail M.McDonough, EvanHill, J. ColinSimonović, MarkoToomey, Michael W.Alexander, StephonZaldarriaga, MatiasConstraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structurehep-thParticle Physics - Theoryhep-phParticle Physics - Phenomenologygr-qcGeneral Relativity and Cosmologyastro-ph.COAstrophysics and AstronomyAn axion-like field comprising ∼10% of the energy density of the Universe near matter-radiation equality is a candidate to resolve the Hubble tension; this is the “early dark energy” (EDE) model. However, as shown in Hill et al., the model fails to simultaneously resolve the Hubble tension and maintain a good fit to both cosmic microwave background (CMB) and large-scale structure (LSS) data. Here, we use redshift-space galaxy clustering data to sharpen constraints on the EDE model. We perform the first EDE analysis using the full-shape power spectrum likelihood from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), based on the effective field theory (EFT) of LSS. The inclusion of this likelihood in the EDE analysis yields a 25% tighter error bar on H0 compared to primary CMB data alone, yielding H0=68.54-0.95+0.52 km/s/Mpc (68% C.L.). In addition, we constrain the maximum fractional energy density contribution of the EDE to fEDE<0.072 (95% C.L.). We explicitly demonstrate that the EFT BOSS likelihood yields much stronger constraints on EDE than the standard BOSS likelihood. Including further information from photometric LSS surveys,the constraints narrow by an additional 20%, yielding H0=68.73-0.69+0.42 km/s/Mpc (68% C.L.) and fEDE<0.053 (95% C.L.). These bounds are obtained without including local-Universe H0 data, which is in strong tension with the CMB and LSS, even in the EDE model. We also refute claims that Markov-chain Monte Carlo analyses of EDE that omit SH0ES from the combined dataset yield misleading posteriors. Finally, we show that upcoming Euclid/DESI-like spectroscopic galaxy surveys will greatly improve the EDE constraints. We conclude that current data preclude the EDE model as a resolution of the Hubble tension, and that future LSS surveys can close the remaining parameter space of this model.An axion-like field comprising $\sim 10\%$ of the energy density of the universe near matter-radiation equality is a candidate to resolve the Hubble tension; this is the "early dark energy" (EDE) model. However, as shown in Hill et al. (2020), the model fails to simultaneously resolve the Hubble tension and maintain a good fit to both cosmic microwave background (CMB) and large-scale structure (LSS) data. Here, we use redshift-space galaxy clustering data to sharpen constraints on the EDE model. We perform the first EDE analysis using the full-shape power spectrum likelihood from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), based on the effective field theory (EFT) of LSS. The inclusion of this likelihood in the EDE analysis yields a $25\%$ tighter error bar on $H_0$ compared to primary CMB data alone, yielding $H_0 = 68.54^{+0.52}_{-0.95}$ km/s/Mpc ($68\%$ CL). In addition, we constrain the maximum fractional energy density contribution of the EDE to $f_{\rm EDE} < 0.072$ ($95\%$ CL). We explicitly demonstrate that the EFT BOSS likelihood yields much stronger constraints on EDE than the standard BOSS likelihood. Including further information from photometric LSS surveys,the constraints narrow by an additional $20\%$, yielding $H_0 = 68.73^{+0.42}_{-0.69}$ km/s/Mpc ($68\%$ CL) and $f_{\rm EDE}<0.053$ ($95\%$ CL). These bounds are obtained without including local-universe $H_0$ data, which is in strong tension with the CMB and LSS, even in the EDE model. We also refute claims that MCMC analyses of EDE that omit SH0ES from the combined dataset yield misleading posteriors. Finally, we demonstrate that upcoming Euclid/DESI-like spectroscopic galaxy surveys can greatly improve the EDE constraints. We conclude that current data preclude the EDE model as a resolution of the Hubble tension, and that future LSS surveys can close the remaining parameter space of this model.arXiv:2006.11235INR-TH-2020-035; CERN-TH-2020-103oai:cds.cern.ch:27232812020-06-19 |
spellingShingle | hep-th Particle Physics - Theory hep-ph Particle Physics - Phenomenology gr-qc General Relativity and Cosmology astro-ph.CO Astrophysics and Astronomy Ivanov, Mikhail M. McDonough, Evan Hill, J. Colin Simonović, Marko Toomey, Michael W. Alexander, Stephon Zaldarriaga, Matias Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure |
title | Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure |
title_full | Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure |
title_fullStr | Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure |
title_full_unstemmed | Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure |
title_short | Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure |
title_sort | constraining early dark energy with large-scale structure |
topic | hep-th Particle Physics - Theory hep-ph Particle Physics - Phenomenology gr-qc General Relativity and Cosmology astro-ph.CO Astrophysics and Astronomy |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103502 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2723281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ivanovmikhailm constrainingearlydarkenergywithlargescalestructure AT mcdonoughevan constrainingearlydarkenergywithlargescalestructure AT hilljcolin constrainingearlydarkenergywithlargescalestructure AT simonovicmarko constrainingearlydarkenergywithlargescalestructure AT toomeymichaelw constrainingearlydarkenergywithlargescalestructure AT alexanderstephon constrainingearlydarkenergywithlargescalestructure AT zaldarriagamatias constrainingearlydarkenergywithlargescalestructure |