Cargando…
The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase
This paper reports on the second “Throughput” phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first “Accuracy” phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41781-023-00094-w http://cds.cern.ch/record/2766066 |
_version_ | 1780971196166176768 |
---|---|
author | Amrouche, Sabrina Basara, Laurent Calafiura, Paolo Emeliyanov, Dmitry Estrade, Victor Farrell, Steven Germain, Cécile Gligorov, Vladimir Vava Golling, Tobias Gorbunov, Sergey Gray, Heather Guyon, Isabelle Hushchyn, Mikhail Innocente, Vincenzo Kiehn, Moritz Kunze, Marcel Moyse, Edward Rousseau, David Salzburger, Andreas Ustyuzhanin, Andrey Vlimant, Jean-Roch Yilmaz, Yetkin |
author_facet | Amrouche, Sabrina Basara, Laurent Calafiura, Paolo Emeliyanov, Dmitry Estrade, Victor Farrell, Steven Germain, Cécile Gligorov, Vladimir Vava Golling, Tobias Gorbunov, Sergey Gray, Heather Guyon, Isabelle Hushchyn, Mikhail Innocente, Vincenzo Kiehn, Moritz Kunze, Marcel Moyse, Edward Rousseau, David Salzburger, Andreas Ustyuzhanin, Andrey Vlimant, Jean-Roch Yilmaz, Yetkin |
author_sort | Amrouche, Sabrina |
collection | CERN |
description | This paper reports on the second “Throughput” phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first “Accuracy” phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given $O(10^5)$ points, the participants had to connect them into $O(10^4)$ individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms is analysed in depth and lessons derived. |
id | cern-2766066 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-27660662023-03-28T02:39:14Zdoi:10.1007/s41781-023-00094-whttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2766066engAmrouche, SabrinaBasara, LaurentCalafiura, PaoloEmeliyanov, DmitryEstrade, VictorFarrell, StevenGermain, CécileGligorov, Vladimir VavaGolling, TobiasGorbunov, SergeyGray, HeatherGuyon, IsabelleHushchyn, MikhailInnocente, VincenzoKiehn, MoritzKunze, MarcelMoyse, EdwardRousseau, DavidSalzburger, AndreasUstyuzhanin, AndreyVlimant, Jean-RochYilmaz, YetkinThe Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phasehep-exParticle Physics - Experimentcs.LGComputing and ComputersThis paper reports on the second “Throughput” phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first “Accuracy” phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given $O(10^5)$ points, the participants had to connect them into $O(10^4)$ individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms is analysed in depth and lessons derived.<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This paper reports on the second “Throughput” phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first “Accuracy” phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$O(10^5)$$</jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math></jats:alternatives></jats:inline-formula> points, the participants had to connect them into <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$O(10^4)$$</jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math></jats:alternatives></jats:inline-formula> individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms is analysed in depth and lessons derived.</jats:p>This paper reports on the second "Throughput" phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first "Accuracy" phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given O($10^5$) points, the participants had to connect them into O($10^4$) individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms are analysed in depth and lessons derived.arXiv:2105.01160oai:cds.cern.ch:27660662021-05-03 |
spellingShingle | hep-ex Particle Physics - Experiment cs.LG Computing and Computers Amrouche, Sabrina Basara, Laurent Calafiura, Paolo Emeliyanov, Dmitry Estrade, Victor Farrell, Steven Germain, Cécile Gligorov, Vladimir Vava Golling, Tobias Gorbunov, Sergey Gray, Heather Guyon, Isabelle Hushchyn, Mikhail Innocente, Vincenzo Kiehn, Moritz Kunze, Marcel Moyse, Edward Rousseau, David Salzburger, Andreas Ustyuzhanin, Andrey Vlimant, Jean-Roch Yilmaz, Yetkin The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase |
title | The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase |
title_full | The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase |
title_fullStr | The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase |
title_full_unstemmed | The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase |
title_short | The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase |
title_sort | tracking machine learning challenge : throughput phase |
topic | hep-ex Particle Physics - Experiment cs.LG Computing and Computers |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41781-023-00094-w http://cds.cern.ch/record/2766066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amrouchesabrina thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT basaralaurent thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT calafiurapaolo thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT emeliyanovdmitry thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT estradevictor thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT farrellsteven thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT germaincecile thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT gligorovvladimirvava thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT gollingtobias thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT gorbunovsergey thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT grayheather thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT guyonisabelle thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT hushchynmikhail thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT innocentevincenzo thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT kiehnmoritz thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT kunzemarcel thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT moyseedward thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT rousseaudavid thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT salzburgerandreas thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT ustyuzhaninandrey thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT vlimantjeanroch thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT yilmazyetkin thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT amrouchesabrina trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT basaralaurent trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT calafiurapaolo trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT emeliyanovdmitry trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT estradevictor trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT farrellsteven trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT germaincecile trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT gligorovvladimirvava trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT gollingtobias trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT gorbunovsergey trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT grayheather trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT guyonisabelle trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT hushchynmikhail trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT innocentevincenzo trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT kiehnmoritz trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT kunzemarcel trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT moyseedward trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT rousseaudavid trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT salzburgerandreas trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT ustyuzhaninandrey trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT vlimantjeanroch trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase AT yilmazyetkin trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase |