Cargando…

The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase

This paper reports on the second “Throughput” phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first “Accuracy” phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amrouche, Sabrina, Basara, Laurent, Calafiura, Paolo, Emeliyanov, Dmitry, Estrade, Victor, Farrell, Steven, Germain, Cécile, Gligorov, Vladimir Vava, Golling, Tobias, Gorbunov, Sergey, Gray, Heather, Guyon, Isabelle, Hushchyn, Mikhail, Innocente, Vincenzo, Kiehn, Moritz, Kunze, Marcel, Moyse, Edward, Rousseau, David, Salzburger, Andreas, Ustyuzhanin, Andrey, Vlimant, Jean-Roch, Yilmaz, Yetkin
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41781-023-00094-w
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2766066
_version_ 1780971196166176768
author Amrouche, Sabrina
Basara, Laurent
Calafiura, Paolo
Emeliyanov, Dmitry
Estrade, Victor
Farrell, Steven
Germain, Cécile
Gligorov, Vladimir Vava
Golling, Tobias
Gorbunov, Sergey
Gray, Heather
Guyon, Isabelle
Hushchyn, Mikhail
Innocente, Vincenzo
Kiehn, Moritz
Kunze, Marcel
Moyse, Edward
Rousseau, David
Salzburger, Andreas
Ustyuzhanin, Andrey
Vlimant, Jean-Roch
Yilmaz, Yetkin
author_facet Amrouche, Sabrina
Basara, Laurent
Calafiura, Paolo
Emeliyanov, Dmitry
Estrade, Victor
Farrell, Steven
Germain, Cécile
Gligorov, Vladimir Vava
Golling, Tobias
Gorbunov, Sergey
Gray, Heather
Guyon, Isabelle
Hushchyn, Mikhail
Innocente, Vincenzo
Kiehn, Moritz
Kunze, Marcel
Moyse, Edward
Rousseau, David
Salzburger, Andreas
Ustyuzhanin, Andrey
Vlimant, Jean-Roch
Yilmaz, Yetkin
author_sort Amrouche, Sabrina
collection CERN
description This paper reports on the second “Throughput” phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first “Accuracy” phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given $O(10^5)$ points, the participants had to connect them into $O(10^4)$ individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms is analysed in depth and lessons derived.
id cern-2766066
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2021
record_format invenio
spelling cern-27660662023-03-28T02:39:14Zdoi:10.1007/s41781-023-00094-whttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2766066engAmrouche, SabrinaBasara, LaurentCalafiura, PaoloEmeliyanov, DmitryEstrade, VictorFarrell, StevenGermain, CécileGligorov, Vladimir VavaGolling, TobiasGorbunov, SergeyGray, HeatherGuyon, IsabelleHushchyn, MikhailInnocente, VincenzoKiehn, MoritzKunze, MarcelMoyse, EdwardRousseau, DavidSalzburger, AndreasUstyuzhanin, AndreyVlimant, Jean-RochYilmaz, YetkinThe Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phasehep-exParticle Physics - Experimentcs.LGComputing and ComputersThis paper reports on the second “Throughput” phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first “Accuracy” phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given $O(10^5)$ points, the participants had to connect them into $O(10^4)$ individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms is analysed in depth and lessons derived.<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This paper reports on the second “Throughput” phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first “Accuracy” phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$O(10^5)$$</jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math></jats:alternatives></jats:inline-formula> points, the participants had to connect them into <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$O(10^4)$$</jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math></jats:alternatives></jats:inline-formula> individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms is analysed in depth and lessons derived.</jats:p>This paper reports on the second "Throughput" phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first "Accuracy" phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given O($10^5$) points, the participants had to connect them into O($10^4$) individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms are analysed in depth and lessons derived.arXiv:2105.01160oai:cds.cern.ch:27660662021-05-03
spellingShingle hep-ex
Particle Physics - Experiment
cs.LG
Computing and Computers
Amrouche, Sabrina
Basara, Laurent
Calafiura, Paolo
Emeliyanov, Dmitry
Estrade, Victor
Farrell, Steven
Germain, Cécile
Gligorov, Vladimir Vava
Golling, Tobias
Gorbunov, Sergey
Gray, Heather
Guyon, Isabelle
Hushchyn, Mikhail
Innocente, Vincenzo
Kiehn, Moritz
Kunze, Marcel
Moyse, Edward
Rousseau, David
Salzburger, Andreas
Ustyuzhanin, Andrey
Vlimant, Jean-Roch
Yilmaz, Yetkin
The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase
title The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase
title_full The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase
title_fullStr The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase
title_full_unstemmed The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase
title_short The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase
title_sort tracking machine learning challenge : throughput phase
topic hep-ex
Particle Physics - Experiment
cs.LG
Computing and Computers
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41781-023-00094-w
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2766066
work_keys_str_mv AT amrouchesabrina thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT basaralaurent thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT calafiurapaolo thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT emeliyanovdmitry thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT estradevictor thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT farrellsteven thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT germaincecile thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT gligorovvladimirvava thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT gollingtobias thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT gorbunovsergey thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT grayheather thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT guyonisabelle thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT hushchynmikhail thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT innocentevincenzo thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT kiehnmoritz thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT kunzemarcel thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT moyseedward thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT rousseaudavid thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT salzburgerandreas thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT ustyuzhaninandrey thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT vlimantjeanroch thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT yilmazyetkin thetrackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT amrouchesabrina trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT basaralaurent trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT calafiurapaolo trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT emeliyanovdmitry trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT estradevictor trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT farrellsteven trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT germaincecile trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT gligorovvladimirvava trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT gollingtobias trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT gorbunovsergey trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT grayheather trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT guyonisabelle trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT hushchynmikhail trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT innocentevincenzo trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT kiehnmoritz trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT kunzemarcel trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT moyseedward trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT rousseaudavid trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT salzburgerandreas trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT ustyuzhaninandrey trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT vlimantjeanroch trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase
AT yilmazyetkin trackingmachinelearningchallengethroughputphase