Cargando…

The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3

The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) op- erated very successfully in the years 2008 to 2018, in two periods identified as Run 1 and Run 2. ATLAS achieved an overall data-taking efficiency of 94%, largely constrained by the irreducible dead-time introduced to accommodate the limita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazarov, Andrei, Chitan, Adrian, Kazymov, Andrei, Corso-Radu, Alina, Aleksandrov, Igor, Soloviev, Igor, Avolio, Giuseppe, Vasile, Matei Eugen, Mineev, Mikhail
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125104019
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2772943
_version_ 1780971479520772096
author Kazarov, Andrei
Chitan, Adrian
Kazymov, Andrei
Corso-Radu, Alina
Aleksandrov, Igor
Soloviev, Igor
Avolio, Giuseppe
Vasile, Matei Eugen
Mineev, Mikhail
author_facet Kazarov, Andrei
Chitan, Adrian
Kazymov, Andrei
Corso-Radu, Alina
Aleksandrov, Igor
Soloviev, Igor
Avolio, Giuseppe
Vasile, Matei Eugen
Mineev, Mikhail
author_sort Kazarov, Andrei
collection CERN
description The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) op- erated very successfully in the years 2008 to 2018, in two periods identified as Run 1 and Run 2. ATLAS achieved an overall data-taking efficiency of 94%, largely constrained by the irreducible dead-time introduced to accommodate the limitations of the detector read-out electronics. Out of the 6% dead-time only about 15% could be attributed to the central trigger and DAQ system, and out of these, a negligible fraction was due to the Control and Configuration sub- system. Despite these achievements, and in order to improve even more the already excellent efficiency of the whole DAQ system in the coming Run 3, a new campaign of software updates was launched for the second long LHC shut- down (LS2). This paper presents, using a few selected examples, how the work was approached and which new technologies were introduced into the ATLAS DAQ system. Despite these being specific to this system, many solutions can be considered and adapted to different distributed DAQ systems.
id cern-2772943
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2021
record_format invenio
spelling cern-27729432022-08-19T19:21:30Zdoi:10.1051/epjconf/202125104019http://cds.cern.ch/record/2772943engKazarov, AndreiChitan, AdrianKazymov, AndreiCorso-Radu, AlinaAleksandrov, IgorSoloviev, IgorAvolio, GiuseppeVasile, Matei EugenMineev, MikhailThe Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3Particle Physics - ExperimentComputing and ComputersThe ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) op- erated very successfully in the years 2008 to 2018, in two periods identified as Run 1 and Run 2. ATLAS achieved an overall data-taking efficiency of 94%, largely constrained by the irreducible dead-time introduced to accommodate the limitations of the detector read-out electronics. Out of the 6% dead-time only about 15% could be attributed to the central trigger and DAQ system, and out of these, a negligible fraction was due to the Control and Configuration sub- system. Despite these achievements, and in order to improve even more the already excellent efficiency of the whole DAQ system in the coming Run 3, a new campaign of software updates was launched for the second long LHC shut- down (LS2). This paper presents, using a few selected examples, how the work was approached and which new technologies were introduced into the ATLAS DAQ system. Despite these being specific to this system, many solutions can be considered and adapted to different distributed DAQ systems.The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) operated very successfully in the years 2008 to 2018, in two periods identified as Run 1 and Run 2. ATLAS achieved an overall data-taking efficiency of 94%, largely constrained by the irreducible dead-time introduced to accommodate the limitations of the detector read-out electronics. Out of the 6% dead-time only about 15% could be attributed to the central trigger and DAQ system, and out of these, a negligible fraction was due to the Control and Configuration subsystem. Despite these achievements, and in order to improve even more the already excellent efficiency of the whole DAQ system in the coming Run 3, a new campaign of software updates was launched for the second long LHC shutdown (LS2). This paper presents, using a few selected examples, how the work was approached and which new technologies were introduced into the ATLAS Control and Configuration software. Despite these being specific to this system, many solutions can be considered and adapted to different distributed DAQ systems.ATL-DAQ-PROC-2021-003oai:cds.cern.ch:27729432021-06-15
spellingShingle Particle Physics - Experiment
Computing and Computers
Kazarov, Andrei
Chitan, Adrian
Kazymov, Andrei
Corso-Radu, Alina
Aleksandrov, Igor
Soloviev, Igor
Avolio, Giuseppe
Vasile, Matei Eugen
Mineev, Mikhail
The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3
title The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3
title_full The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3
title_fullStr The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3
title_full_unstemmed The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3
title_short The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3
title_sort controls and configuration software of the atlas data acquisition system: evolution towards lhc run 3
topic Particle Physics - Experiment
Computing and Computers
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125104019
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2772943
work_keys_str_mv AT kazarovandrei thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT chitanadrian thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT kazymovandrei thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT corsoradualina thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT aleksandrovigor thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT solovievigor thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT avoliogiuseppe thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT vasilemateieugen thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT mineevmikhail thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT kazarovandrei controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT chitanadrian controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT kazymovandrei controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT corsoradualina controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT aleksandrovigor controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT solovievigor controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT avoliogiuseppe controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT vasilemateieugen controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3
AT mineevmikhail controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3