Cargando…
The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3
The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) op- erated very successfully in the years 2008 to 2018, in two periods identified as Run 1 and Run 2. ATLAS achieved an overall data-taking efficiency of 94%, largely constrained by the irreducible dead-time introduced to accommodate the limita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125104019 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2772943 |
_version_ | 1780971479520772096 |
---|---|
author | Kazarov, Andrei Chitan, Adrian Kazymov, Andrei Corso-Radu, Alina Aleksandrov, Igor Soloviev, Igor Avolio, Giuseppe Vasile, Matei Eugen Mineev, Mikhail |
author_facet | Kazarov, Andrei Chitan, Adrian Kazymov, Andrei Corso-Radu, Alina Aleksandrov, Igor Soloviev, Igor Avolio, Giuseppe Vasile, Matei Eugen Mineev, Mikhail |
author_sort | Kazarov, Andrei |
collection | CERN |
description | The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) op- erated very successfully in the years 2008 to 2018, in two periods identified as Run 1 and Run 2. ATLAS achieved an overall data-taking efficiency of 94%, largely constrained by the irreducible dead-time introduced to accommodate the limitations of the detector read-out electronics. Out of the 6% dead-time only about 15% could be attributed to the central trigger and DAQ system, and out of these, a negligible fraction was due to the Control and Configuration sub- system. Despite these achievements, and in order to improve even more the already excellent efficiency of the whole DAQ system in the coming Run 3, a new campaign of software updates was launched for the second long LHC shut- down (LS2). This paper presents, using a few selected examples, how the work was approached and which new technologies were introduced into the ATLAS DAQ system. Despite these being specific to this system, many solutions can be considered and adapted to different distributed DAQ systems. |
id | cern-2772943 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-27729432022-08-19T19:21:30Zdoi:10.1051/epjconf/202125104019http://cds.cern.ch/record/2772943engKazarov, AndreiChitan, AdrianKazymov, AndreiCorso-Radu, AlinaAleksandrov, IgorSoloviev, IgorAvolio, GiuseppeVasile, Matei EugenMineev, MikhailThe Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3Particle Physics - ExperimentComputing and ComputersThe ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) op- erated very successfully in the years 2008 to 2018, in two periods identified as Run 1 and Run 2. ATLAS achieved an overall data-taking efficiency of 94%, largely constrained by the irreducible dead-time introduced to accommodate the limitations of the detector read-out electronics. Out of the 6% dead-time only about 15% could be attributed to the central trigger and DAQ system, and out of these, a negligible fraction was due to the Control and Configuration sub- system. Despite these achievements, and in order to improve even more the already excellent efficiency of the whole DAQ system in the coming Run 3, a new campaign of software updates was launched for the second long LHC shut- down (LS2). This paper presents, using a few selected examples, how the work was approached and which new technologies were introduced into the ATLAS DAQ system. Despite these being specific to this system, many solutions can be considered and adapted to different distributed DAQ systems.The ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) operated very successfully in the years 2008 to 2018, in two periods identified as Run 1 and Run 2. ATLAS achieved an overall data-taking efficiency of 94%, largely constrained by the irreducible dead-time introduced to accommodate the limitations of the detector read-out electronics. Out of the 6% dead-time only about 15% could be attributed to the central trigger and DAQ system, and out of these, a negligible fraction was due to the Control and Configuration subsystem. Despite these achievements, and in order to improve even more the already excellent efficiency of the whole DAQ system in the coming Run 3, a new campaign of software updates was launched for the second long LHC shutdown (LS2). This paper presents, using a few selected examples, how the work was approached and which new technologies were introduced into the ATLAS Control and Configuration software. Despite these being specific to this system, many solutions can be considered and adapted to different distributed DAQ systems.ATL-DAQ-PROC-2021-003oai:cds.cern.ch:27729432021-06-15 |
spellingShingle | Particle Physics - Experiment Computing and Computers Kazarov, Andrei Chitan, Adrian Kazymov, Andrei Corso-Radu, Alina Aleksandrov, Igor Soloviev, Igor Avolio, Giuseppe Vasile, Matei Eugen Mineev, Mikhail The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3 |
title | The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3 |
title_full | The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3 |
title_fullStr | The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3 |
title_full_unstemmed | The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3 |
title_short | The Controls and Configuration Software of the ATLAS Data Acquisition System: evolution towards LHC Run 3 |
title_sort | controls and configuration software of the atlas data acquisition system: evolution towards lhc run 3 |
topic | Particle Physics - Experiment Computing and Computers |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125104019 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2772943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazarovandrei thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT chitanadrian thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT kazymovandrei thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT corsoradualina thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT aleksandrovigor thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT solovievigor thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT avoliogiuseppe thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT vasilemateieugen thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT mineevmikhail thecontrolsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT kazarovandrei controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT chitanadrian controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT kazymovandrei controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT corsoradualina controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT aleksandrovigor controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT solovievigor controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT avoliogiuseppe controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT vasilemateieugen controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 AT mineevmikhail controlsandconfigurationsoftwareoftheatlasdataacquisitionsystemevolutiontowardslhcrun3 |