Cargando…

Evaluation of Compatibility among Network Adjustment Software: CoMeT, LGC, and Trinet+

A network adjustment program is an essential tool for surveyors. It allows the computation of point coordinates and confidence regions from measurements undertaken in the field. It also helps surveyors in the design of optimal networks, both in terms of accuracy and reliability. Conservatoire nation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Durand, Stéphane, Touzé, Thomas, Jones, Mark, Guillaume, Sébastien, Cattin, Paul Henri, Morel, Laurent
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)su.1943-5428.0000304
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2801423
_version_ 1780972694817210368
author Durand, Stéphane
Touzé, Thomas
Jones, Mark
Guillaume, Sébastien
Cattin, Paul Henri
Morel, Laurent
author_facet Durand, Stéphane
Touzé, Thomas
Jones, Mark
Guillaume, Sébastien
Cattin, Paul Henri
Morel, Laurent
author_sort Durand, Stéphane
collection CERN
description A network adjustment program is an essential tool for surveyors. It allows the computation of point coordinates and confidence regions from measurements undertaken in the field. It also helps surveyors in the design of optimal networks, both in terms of accuracy and reliability. Conservatoire national des arts et métiers (Cnam), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), and School of Management and Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD) are three institutions that have developed their own network adjustment applications: Compensation de Mesures Topographiques (CoMeT), Logiciel Général de Compensation (LGC), and Trinet+, respectively. In all these applications, three-dimensional (3D) mathematical functional models are used to process conventional observations and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) 3D vectors. However, some discrepancies may exist in the obtained results between these applications due to differences in the implementation of the functional models. The main objective of this work is to study software effects, and to ensure compatibility and interoperability between these three network adjustment applications. We first present the relevant differences between these applications and then the processing methodology adopted to ensure the best compatibility and interoperability between them. Using generated measurements, which include Gaussian errors, we have been able to study the impact of any differences in the implementation of the functional models on the estimated variance factor and adjusted parameters.
id cern-2801423
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2020
record_format invenio
spelling cern-28014232022-02-13T18:28:07Zdoi:10.1061/(asce)su.1943-5428.0000304http://cds.cern.ch/record/2801423engDurand, StéphaneTouzé, ThomasJones, MarkGuillaume, SébastienCattin, Paul HenriMorel, LaurentEvaluation of Compatibility among Network Adjustment Software: CoMeT, LGC, and Trinet+Computing and ComputersA network adjustment program is an essential tool for surveyors. It allows the computation of point coordinates and confidence regions from measurements undertaken in the field. It also helps surveyors in the design of optimal networks, both in terms of accuracy and reliability. Conservatoire national des arts et métiers (Cnam), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), and School of Management and Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD) are three institutions that have developed their own network adjustment applications: Compensation de Mesures Topographiques (CoMeT), Logiciel Général de Compensation (LGC), and Trinet+, respectively. In all these applications, three-dimensional (3D) mathematical functional models are used to process conventional observations and global navigation satellite system (GNSS) 3D vectors. However, some discrepancies may exist in the obtained results between these applications due to differences in the implementation of the functional models. The main objective of this work is to study software effects, and to ensure compatibility and interoperability between these three network adjustment applications. We first present the relevant differences between these applications and then the processing methodology adopted to ensure the best compatibility and interoperability between them. Using generated measurements, which include Gaussian errors, we have been able to study the impact of any differences in the implementation of the functional models on the estimated variance factor and adjusted parameters.oai:cds.cern.ch:28014232020
spellingShingle Computing and Computers
Durand, Stéphane
Touzé, Thomas
Jones, Mark
Guillaume, Sébastien
Cattin, Paul Henri
Morel, Laurent
Evaluation of Compatibility among Network Adjustment Software: CoMeT, LGC, and Trinet+
title Evaluation of Compatibility among Network Adjustment Software: CoMeT, LGC, and Trinet+
title_full Evaluation of Compatibility among Network Adjustment Software: CoMeT, LGC, and Trinet+
title_fullStr Evaluation of Compatibility among Network Adjustment Software: CoMeT, LGC, and Trinet+
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Compatibility among Network Adjustment Software: CoMeT, LGC, and Trinet+
title_short Evaluation of Compatibility among Network Adjustment Software: CoMeT, LGC, and Trinet+
title_sort evaluation of compatibility among network adjustment software: comet, lgc, and trinet+
topic Computing and Computers
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)su.1943-5428.0000304
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2801423
work_keys_str_mv AT durandstephane evaluationofcompatibilityamongnetworkadjustmentsoftwarecometlgcandtrinet
AT touzethomas evaluationofcompatibilityamongnetworkadjustmentsoftwarecometlgcandtrinet
AT jonesmark evaluationofcompatibilityamongnetworkadjustmentsoftwarecometlgcandtrinet
AT guillaumesebastien evaluationofcompatibilityamongnetworkadjustmentsoftwarecometlgcandtrinet
AT cattinpaulhenri evaluationofcompatibilityamongnetworkadjustmentsoftwarecometlgcandtrinet
AT morellaurent evaluationofcompatibilityamongnetworkadjustmentsoftwarecometlgcandtrinet