Cargando…

Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility

As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aberle, Oliver, Ahdida, Claudia, Arrutia, Pablo, Balazs, Kincso, Bernhard, Johannes, Brugger, Markus, Calviani, Marco, Dutheil, Yann, Ximenes, Rui Franqueira, Fraser, Matthew, Galleazzi, Frederic, Gilardoni, Simone, Grenard, Jean-Louis, Griesemer, Tina, Jacobsson, Richard, Kain, Verena, Lafarge, Damien, Marsh, Simon, Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria, Andrade, Ramiro Francisco Mena, Muttoni, Yvon, Navascues Cornago, Angel, Ninin, Pierre, Osborne, John, Ramjiawan, Rebecca, Santos Diaz, Pablo, Sanchez Galan, Francisco, Vincke, Heinz, Vojtyla, Pavol
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/2802785
_version_ 1780972759263739904
author Aberle, Oliver
Ahdida, Claudia
Arrutia, Pablo
Balazs, Kincso
Bernhard, Johannes
Brugger, Markus
Calviani, Marco
Dutheil, Yann
Ximenes, Rui Franqueira
Fraser, Matthew
Galleazzi, Frederic
Gilardoni, Simone
Grenard, Jean-Louis
Griesemer, Tina
Jacobsson, Richard
Kain, Verena
Lafarge, Damien
Marsh, Simon
Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria
Andrade, Ramiro Francisco Mena
Muttoni, Yvon
Navascues Cornago, Angel
Ninin, Pierre
Osborne, John
Ramjiawan, Rebecca
Santos Diaz, Pablo
Sanchez Galan, Francisco
Vincke, Heinz
Vojtyla, Pavol
author_facet Aberle, Oliver
Ahdida, Claudia
Arrutia, Pablo
Balazs, Kincso
Bernhard, Johannes
Brugger, Markus
Calviani, Marco
Dutheil, Yann
Ximenes, Rui Franqueira
Fraser, Matthew
Galleazzi, Frederic
Gilardoni, Simone
Grenard, Jean-Louis
Griesemer, Tina
Jacobsson, Richard
Kain, Verena
Lafarge, Damien
Marsh, Simon
Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria
Andrade, Ramiro Francisco Mena
Muttoni, Yvon
Navascues Cornago, Angel
Ninin, Pierre
Osborne, John
Ramjiawan, Rebecca
Santos Diaz, Pablo
Sanchez Galan, Francisco
Vincke, Heinz
Vojtyla, Pavol
author_sort Aberle, Oliver
collection CERN
description As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the $4\times 10^{19}$ protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021.
id cern-2802785
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
publishDate 2022
record_format invenio
spelling cern-28027852023-06-29T04:18:37Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2802785Aberle, OliverAhdida, ClaudiaArrutia, PabloBalazs, KincsoBernhard, JohannesBrugger, MarkusCalviani, MarcoDutheil, YannXimenes, Rui FranqueiraFraser, MatthewGalleazzi, FredericGilardoni, SimoneGrenard, Jean-LouisGriesemer, TinaJacobsson, RichardKain, VerenaLafarge, DamienMarsh, SimonMartin Ruiz, Jose MariaAndrade, Ramiro Francisco MenaMuttoni, YvonNavascues Cornago, AngelNinin, PierreOsborne, JohnRamjiawan, RebeccaSantos Diaz, PabloSanchez Galan, FranciscoVincke, HeinzVojtyla, PavolStudy of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump FacilityDetectors and Experimental TechniquesAs part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the $4\times 10^{19}$ protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021.As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the $4\times 10^{19}$ protons per year at 400 GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021. The document concludes with a qualitative comparison of the options, summarising the associated benefits and challenges of each option, such that a recommendation can be made about which location is to be pursued. The most critical location-specific studies required to specify the implementation and cost for each option are identified so that the detailed investigation of the retained option can be completed before the end of 2022.arXiv:2204.03549CERN-SPSC-2022-009SPSC-SR-305oai:cds.cern.ch:28027852022-03-01
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Aberle, Oliver
Ahdida, Claudia
Arrutia, Pablo
Balazs, Kincso
Bernhard, Johannes
Brugger, Markus
Calviani, Marco
Dutheil, Yann
Ximenes, Rui Franqueira
Fraser, Matthew
Galleazzi, Frederic
Gilardoni, Simone
Grenard, Jean-Louis
Griesemer, Tina
Jacobsson, Richard
Kain, Verena
Lafarge, Damien
Marsh, Simon
Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria
Andrade, Ramiro Francisco Mena
Muttoni, Yvon
Navascues Cornago, Angel
Ninin, Pierre
Osborne, John
Ramjiawan, Rebecca
Santos Diaz, Pablo
Sanchez Galan, Francisco
Vincke, Heinz
Vojtyla, Pavol
Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility
title Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility
title_full Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility
title_fullStr Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility
title_full_unstemmed Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility
title_short Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility
title_sort study of alternative locations for the sps beam dump facility
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/2802785
work_keys_str_mv AT aberleoliver studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT ahdidaclaudia studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT arrutiapablo studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT balazskincso studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT bernhardjohannes studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT bruggermarkus studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT calvianimarco studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT dutheilyann studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT ximenesruifranqueira studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT frasermatthew studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT galleazzifrederic studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT gilardonisimone studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT grenardjeanlouis studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT griesemertina studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT jacobssonrichard studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT kainverena studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT lafargedamien studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT marshsimon studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT martinruizjosemaria studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT andraderamirofranciscomena studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT muttoniyvon studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT navascuescornagoangel studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT nininpierre studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT osbornejohn studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT ramjiawanrebecca studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT santosdiazpablo studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT sanchezgalanfrancisco studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT vinckeheinz studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility
AT vojtylapavol studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility