Cargando…
Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility
As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/2802785 |
_version_ | 1780972759263739904 |
---|---|
author | Aberle, Oliver Ahdida, Claudia Arrutia, Pablo Balazs, Kincso Bernhard, Johannes Brugger, Markus Calviani, Marco Dutheil, Yann Ximenes, Rui Franqueira Fraser, Matthew Galleazzi, Frederic Gilardoni, Simone Grenard, Jean-Louis Griesemer, Tina Jacobsson, Richard Kain, Verena Lafarge, Damien Marsh, Simon Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria Andrade, Ramiro Francisco Mena Muttoni, Yvon Navascues Cornago, Angel Ninin, Pierre Osborne, John Ramjiawan, Rebecca Santos Diaz, Pablo Sanchez Galan, Francisco Vincke, Heinz Vojtyla, Pavol |
author_facet | Aberle, Oliver Ahdida, Claudia Arrutia, Pablo Balazs, Kincso Bernhard, Johannes Brugger, Markus Calviani, Marco Dutheil, Yann Ximenes, Rui Franqueira Fraser, Matthew Galleazzi, Frederic Gilardoni, Simone Grenard, Jean-Louis Griesemer, Tina Jacobsson, Richard Kain, Verena Lafarge, Damien Marsh, Simon Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria Andrade, Ramiro Francisco Mena Muttoni, Yvon Navascues Cornago, Angel Ninin, Pierre Osborne, John Ramjiawan, Rebecca Santos Diaz, Pablo Sanchez Galan, Francisco Vincke, Heinz Vojtyla, Pavol |
author_sort | Aberle, Oliver |
collection | CERN |
description | As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the $4\times 10^{19}$ protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021. |
id | cern-2802785 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-28027852023-06-29T04:18:37Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2802785Aberle, OliverAhdida, ClaudiaArrutia, PabloBalazs, KincsoBernhard, JohannesBrugger, MarkusCalviani, MarcoDutheil, YannXimenes, Rui FranqueiraFraser, MatthewGalleazzi, FredericGilardoni, SimoneGrenard, Jean-LouisGriesemer, TinaJacobsson, RichardKain, VerenaLafarge, DamienMarsh, SimonMartin Ruiz, Jose MariaAndrade, Ramiro Francisco MenaMuttoni, YvonNavascues Cornago, AngelNinin, PierreOsborne, JohnRamjiawan, RebeccaSantos Diaz, PabloSanchez Galan, FranciscoVincke, HeinzVojtyla, PavolStudy of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump FacilityDetectors and Experimental TechniquesAs part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the $4\times 10^{19}$ protons per year at 400\,GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021.As part of the main focus of the BDF Working Group in 2021, this document reports on the study of alternative locations and possible optimisation that may accompany the reuse of existing facilities with the aim of significantly reducing the costs of the facility. Building on the BDF/SHiP Comprehensive Design Study (CDS), the assessment rests on the generic requirements and constraints that allow preserving the physics reach of the facility by making use of the $4\times 10^{19}$ protons per year at 400 GeV that are currently not exploited at the SPS and for which no existing facility is compatible. The options considered involve the underground areas TCC4, TNC, and ECN3. Recent improvements of the BDF design at the current location (referred to as `TT90-TCC9-ECN4') are also mentioned together with ideas for yet further improvements. The assessments of the alternative locations compiled the large amount of information that is already available together with a set of conceptual studies that were performed during 2021. The document concludes with a qualitative comparison of the options, summarising the associated benefits and challenges of each option, such that a recommendation can be made about which location is to be pursued. The most critical location-specific studies required to specify the implementation and cost for each option are identified so that the detailed investigation of the retained option can be completed before the end of 2022.arXiv:2204.03549CERN-SPSC-2022-009SPSC-SR-305oai:cds.cern.ch:28027852022-03-01 |
spellingShingle | Detectors and Experimental Techniques Aberle, Oliver Ahdida, Claudia Arrutia, Pablo Balazs, Kincso Bernhard, Johannes Brugger, Markus Calviani, Marco Dutheil, Yann Ximenes, Rui Franqueira Fraser, Matthew Galleazzi, Frederic Gilardoni, Simone Grenard, Jean-Louis Griesemer, Tina Jacobsson, Richard Kain, Verena Lafarge, Damien Marsh, Simon Martin Ruiz, Jose Maria Andrade, Ramiro Francisco Mena Muttoni, Yvon Navascues Cornago, Angel Ninin, Pierre Osborne, John Ramjiawan, Rebecca Santos Diaz, Pablo Sanchez Galan, Francisco Vincke, Heinz Vojtyla, Pavol Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility |
title | Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility |
title_full | Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility |
title_fullStr | Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility |
title_full_unstemmed | Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility |
title_short | Study of alternative locations for the SPS Beam Dump Facility |
title_sort | study of alternative locations for the sps beam dump facility |
topic | Detectors and Experimental Techniques |
url | http://cds.cern.ch/record/2802785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aberleoliver studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT ahdidaclaudia studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT arrutiapablo studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT balazskincso studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT bernhardjohannes studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT bruggermarkus studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT calvianimarco studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT dutheilyann studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT ximenesruifranqueira studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT frasermatthew studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT galleazzifrederic studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT gilardonisimone studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT grenardjeanlouis studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT griesemertina studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT jacobssonrichard studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT kainverena studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT lafargedamien studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT marshsimon studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT martinruizjosemaria studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT andraderamirofranciscomena studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT muttoniyvon studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT navascuescornagoangel studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT nininpierre studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT osbornejohn studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT ramjiawanrebecca studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT santosdiazpablo studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT sanchezgalanfrancisco studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT vinckeheinz studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility AT vojtylapavol studyofalternativelocationsforthespsbeamdumpfacility |