Cargando…

Quantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructures

This article presents a reliability analysis method and a series of case studies of different architectures for interlock systems of large and complex research infrastructures. Interlock systems play a crucial role in the protection of different types of machines, including present and future partic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, S, Schmidt, R, Apollonio, A, Zerlauth, M
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.25.073501
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2815329
_version_ 1780973506754772992
author Wagner, S
Schmidt, R
Apollonio, A
Zerlauth, M
author_facet Wagner, S
Schmidt, R
Apollonio, A
Zerlauth, M
author_sort Wagner, S
collection CERN
description This article presents a reliability analysis method and a series of case studies of different architectures for interlock systems of large and complex research infrastructures. Interlock systems play a crucial role in the protection of different types of machines, including present and future particle accelerators and fusion experiments. These infrastructures require multibillion Euros investments and accidents could cause irreparable damage. Protection systems are needed to prevent damage from an unintended release of large amounts of stored energy or power. Interlock systems define the signal exchange between the sensors that detect non-nominal conditions and the actuators that bring the machine into a safe state through a protection shutdown. The design of machine protection systems in general and interlock systems, in particular, is caught between the desired machine safety and machine availability, and the requirements vary between different infrastructures. For some infrastructures, interlock systems must be designed to strictly avoid unintentional shutdowns, as these can have a significant impact on the lifetime of vital equipment or their primary operational purpose. For others, unintentional shutdowns due to a failure in the interlock system are acceptable as long as their number is small compared to protection shutdowns caused by failures of other equipment, in order to maximize their scientific output. The case studies presented in the article compare different interlock architectures based on the probability of specific failure scenarios occurring.
id cern-2815329
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2022
record_format invenio
spelling cern-28153292023-08-09T12:19:49Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.25.073501http://cds.cern.ch/record/2815329engWagner, SSchmidt, RApollonio, AZerlauth, MQuantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructuresAccelerators and Storage RingsThis article presents a reliability analysis method and a series of case studies of different architectures for interlock systems of large and complex research infrastructures. Interlock systems play a crucial role in the protection of different types of machines, including present and future particle accelerators and fusion experiments. These infrastructures require multibillion Euros investments and accidents could cause irreparable damage. Protection systems are needed to prevent damage from an unintended release of large amounts of stored energy or power. Interlock systems define the signal exchange between the sensors that detect non-nominal conditions and the actuators that bring the machine into a safe state through a protection shutdown. The design of machine protection systems in general and interlock systems, in particular, is caught between the desired machine safety and machine availability, and the requirements vary between different infrastructures. For some infrastructures, interlock systems must be designed to strictly avoid unintentional shutdowns, as these can have a significant impact on the lifetime of vital equipment or their primary operational purpose. For others, unintentional shutdowns due to a failure in the interlock system are acceptable as long as their number is small compared to protection shutdowns caused by failures of other equipment, in order to maximize their scientific output. The case studies presented in the article compare different interlock architectures based on the probability of specific failure scenarios occurring.oai:cds.cern.ch:28153292022
spellingShingle Accelerators and Storage Rings
Wagner, S
Schmidt, R
Apollonio, A
Zerlauth, M
Quantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructures
title Quantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructures
title_full Quantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructures
title_fullStr Quantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructures
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructures
title_short Quantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructures
title_sort quantitative reliability analysis of interlock systems for research infrastructures
topic Accelerators and Storage Rings
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.25.073501
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2815329
work_keys_str_mv AT wagners quantitativereliabilityanalysisofinterlocksystemsforresearchinfrastructures
AT schmidtr quantitativereliabilityanalysisofinterlocksystemsforresearchinfrastructures
AT apollonioa quantitativereliabilityanalysisofinterlocksystemsforresearchinfrastructures
AT zerlauthm quantitativereliabilityanalysisofinterlocksystemsforresearchinfrastructures