Cargando…

Cosmic ray $e^±$ at high energy

There is a commonly expressed opinion in the literature, that cosmic-ray (CR) e+ come from a primary source, which could be dark matter or pulsars. In these proceedings we review some evidence to the contrary: namely, that e+ come from secondary production due to CR nuclei scattering on interstellar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blum, Kfir, Reinert, Annika
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201920804001
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2826890
_version_ 1780973863323041792
author Blum, Kfir
Reinert, Annika
author_facet Blum, Kfir
Reinert, Annika
author_sort Blum, Kfir
collection CERN
description There is a commonly expressed opinion in the literature, that cosmic-ray (CR) e+ come from a primary source, which could be dark matter or pulsars. In these proceedings we review some evidence to the contrary: namely, that e+ come from secondary production due to CR nuclei scattering on interstellar matter. We show that recent measurements of the total e± flux at E ≲ 3 TeV are in good agreement with the predicted flux of secondary e±, that would be obtained if radiative energy losses during CR propagation do not play an important role. If the agreement between data and secondary prediction is not accidental, then the requirement of negligible radiative energy losses implies a very short propagation time for high energy CRs: tesc ≲. 105 yr at rigidities R ≳ 3 TV. Such short propagation history may imply that a recent, near-by source dominates the CRs at these energies. We review independent evidence for a transition in CR propagation, based on the spectral hardening of primary and secondary nuclei around R ~ 100 GV. The transition rigidity of the nuclei matches the rigidity at which the e+ flux saturates its secondary upper bound.
id cern-2826890
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2019
record_format invenio
spelling cern-28268902022-09-13T20:18:42Zdoi:10.1051/epjconf/201920804001http://cds.cern.ch/record/2826890engBlum, KfirReinert, AnnikaCosmic ray $e^±$ at high energyAstrophysics and AstronomyThere is a commonly expressed opinion in the literature, that cosmic-ray (CR) e+ come from a primary source, which could be dark matter or pulsars. In these proceedings we review some evidence to the contrary: namely, that e+ come from secondary production due to CR nuclei scattering on interstellar matter. We show that recent measurements of the total e± flux at E ≲ 3 TeV are in good agreement with the predicted flux of secondary e±, that would be obtained if radiative energy losses during CR propagation do not play an important role. If the agreement between data and secondary prediction is not accidental, then the requirement of negligible radiative energy losses implies a very short propagation time for high energy CRs: tesc ≲. 105 yr at rigidities R ≳ 3 TV. Such short propagation history may imply that a recent, near-by source dominates the CRs at these energies. We review independent evidence for a transition in CR propagation, based on the spectral hardening of primary and secondary nuclei around R ~ 100 GV. The transition rigidity of the nuclei matches the rigidity at which the e+ flux saturates its secondary upper bound.oai:cds.cern.ch:28268902019
spellingShingle Astrophysics and Astronomy
Blum, Kfir
Reinert, Annika
Cosmic ray $e^±$ at high energy
title Cosmic ray $e^±$ at high energy
title_full Cosmic ray $e^±$ at high energy
title_fullStr Cosmic ray $e^±$ at high energy
title_full_unstemmed Cosmic ray $e^±$ at high energy
title_short Cosmic ray $e^±$ at high energy
title_sort cosmic ray $e^±$ at high energy
topic Astrophysics and Astronomy
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201920804001
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2826890
work_keys_str_mv AT blumkfir cosmicrayeathighenergy
AT reinertannika cosmicrayeathighenergy