Cargando…
Status and challenges of the interaction region magnets for HL-LHC
About one hundred magnets of six different types shall be installed in the High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) in the years 2026-2028 at CERN. The magnets design, construction and test are based on CERN collaborations with institutes and industrial partners in USA, Spain, Italy, Japan and China. Three type...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Lenguaje: | eng |
| Publicado: |
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2023.3244143 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2853515 |
| _version_ | 1780977217633779712 |
|---|---|
| author | Todesco, E Izquierdo Bermudez, S Foussat, A Gautheron, E Kirby, G Felice, H Perez, J C Fleiter, J Barth, C Milanese, A Prin, H Lusa, N Ferradas Troitino, J Ferradas Troitino, S Mangiarotti, F Principe, R Willering, G Duarte Ramos, D Ballarino, A Russenschuck, S Devred, A Bednarek, M Rodriguez-Mateos, F Statera, M Prioli, M Sorbi, M Mariotto, S Farinon, S Bersani, A Caiffi, B Fabbricatore, P Levi, F Pampaloni, A Toral, F Martins, C Matos, J Garcia Nakamoto, T Sugano, M Suzuki, K Xu, Q Wang, Y Wei, W Apollinari, G Carcagno, R Feher, S Ambrosio, G Baldini, M Yu, M Nobrega, A Vouris, A Chlachidze, G Stoynev, S Amm, K Schmalzle, J Anarella, M Muratore, J Yahia, A Ben Joshi, P Ferracin, P Prestemon, S Cheng, D Strauss, T Cooley, L |
| author_facet | Todesco, E Izquierdo Bermudez, S Foussat, A Gautheron, E Kirby, G Felice, H Perez, J C Fleiter, J Barth, C Milanese, A Prin, H Lusa, N Ferradas Troitino, J Ferradas Troitino, S Mangiarotti, F Principe, R Willering, G Duarte Ramos, D Ballarino, A Russenschuck, S Devred, A Bednarek, M Rodriguez-Mateos, F Statera, M Prioli, M Sorbi, M Mariotto, S Farinon, S Bersani, A Caiffi, B Fabbricatore, P Levi, F Pampaloni, A Toral, F Martins, C Matos, J Garcia Nakamoto, T Sugano, M Suzuki, K Xu, Q Wang, Y Wei, W Apollinari, G Carcagno, R Feher, S Ambrosio, G Baldini, M Yu, M Nobrega, A Vouris, A Chlachidze, G Stoynev, S Amm, K Schmalzle, J Anarella, M Muratore, J Yahia, A Ben Joshi, P Ferracin, P Prestemon, S Cheng, D Strauss, T Cooley, L |
| author_sort | Todesco, E |
| collection | CERN |
| description | About one hundred magnets of six different types shall be installed in the High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) in the years 2026-2028 at CERN. The magnets design, construction and test are based on CERN collaborations with institutes and industrial partners in USA, Spain, Italy, Japan and China. Three types of correctors are based on Nb‒Ti technology and feature conductor peak fields in the 2 to 4 T range: for all of them the prototype phase has been successfully completed. The production is well advanced for the superferric correctors, and is starting for the canted cosine theta correctors and for the nested correctors. The separation and recombination Nb‒Ti dipoles D1 and D2, with a 4.5-6 T bore field range, are both in the prototype phase after the completion of the short model program. The most challenging magnet, the Nb3Sn quadrupole with conductor peak field above 11 T, is in the prototype phase at CERN and halfway through the production phase in the USA. In this paper we will give, for each type of magnet, an overview of the main achievements obtained so far and we will outline the technical points still needing validation from the prototype program. |
| id | cern-2853515 |
| institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | invenio |
| spelling | cern-28535152023-03-28T10:05:36Zdoi:10.1109/TASC.2023.3244143http://cds.cern.ch/record/2853515engTodesco, EIzquierdo Bermudez, SFoussat, AGautheron, EKirby, GFelice, HPerez, J CFleiter, JBarth, CMilanese, APrin, HLusa, NFerradas Troitino, JFerradas Troitino, SMangiarotti, FPrincipe, RWillering, GDuarte Ramos, DBallarino, ARussenschuck, SDevred, ABednarek, MRodriguez-Mateos, FStatera, MPrioli, MSorbi, MMariotto, SFarinon, SBersani, ACaiffi, BFabbricatore, PLevi, FPampaloni, AToral, FMartins, CMatos, J GarciaNakamoto, TSugano, MSuzuki, KXu, QWang, YWei, WApollinari, GCarcagno, RFeher, SAmbrosio, GBaldini, MYu, MNobrega, AVouris, AChlachidze, GStoynev, SAmm, KSchmalzle, JAnarella, MMuratore, JYahia, A BenJoshi, PFerracin, PPrestemon, SCheng, DStrauss, TCooley, LStatus and challenges of the interaction region magnets for HL-LHCParticle Physics - TheoryAbout one hundred magnets of six different types shall be installed in the High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) in the years 2026-2028 at CERN. The magnets design, construction and test are based on CERN collaborations with institutes and industrial partners in USA, Spain, Italy, Japan and China. Three types of correctors are based on Nb‒Ti technology and feature conductor peak fields in the 2 to 4 T range: for all of them the prototype phase has been successfully completed. The production is well advanced for the superferric correctors, and is starting for the canted cosine theta correctors and for the nested correctors. The separation and recombination Nb‒Ti dipoles D1 and D2, with a 4.5-6 T bore field range, are both in the prototype phase after the completion of the short model program. The most challenging magnet, the Nb3Sn quadrupole with conductor peak field above 11 T, is in the prototype phase at CERN and halfway through the production phase in the USA. In this paper we will give, for each type of magnet, an overview of the main achievements obtained so far and we will outline the technical points still needing validation from the prototype program.FERMILAB-PUB-22-861-TDoai:cds.cern.ch:28535152022 |
| spellingShingle | Particle Physics - Theory Todesco, E Izquierdo Bermudez, S Foussat, A Gautheron, E Kirby, G Felice, H Perez, J C Fleiter, J Barth, C Milanese, A Prin, H Lusa, N Ferradas Troitino, J Ferradas Troitino, S Mangiarotti, F Principe, R Willering, G Duarte Ramos, D Ballarino, A Russenschuck, S Devred, A Bednarek, M Rodriguez-Mateos, F Statera, M Prioli, M Sorbi, M Mariotto, S Farinon, S Bersani, A Caiffi, B Fabbricatore, P Levi, F Pampaloni, A Toral, F Martins, C Matos, J Garcia Nakamoto, T Sugano, M Suzuki, K Xu, Q Wang, Y Wei, W Apollinari, G Carcagno, R Feher, S Ambrosio, G Baldini, M Yu, M Nobrega, A Vouris, A Chlachidze, G Stoynev, S Amm, K Schmalzle, J Anarella, M Muratore, J Yahia, A Ben Joshi, P Ferracin, P Prestemon, S Cheng, D Strauss, T Cooley, L Status and challenges of the interaction region magnets for HL-LHC |
| title | Status and challenges of the interaction region magnets for HL-LHC |
| title_full | Status and challenges of the interaction region magnets for HL-LHC |
| title_fullStr | Status and challenges of the interaction region magnets for HL-LHC |
| title_full_unstemmed | Status and challenges of the interaction region magnets for HL-LHC |
| title_short | Status and challenges of the interaction region magnets for HL-LHC |
| title_sort | status and challenges of the interaction region magnets for hl-lhc |
| topic | Particle Physics - Theory |
| url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2023.3244143 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2853515 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT todescoe statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT izquierdobermudezs statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT foussata statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT gautherone statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT kirbyg statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT feliceh statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT perezjc statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT fleiterj statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT barthc statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT milanesea statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT prinh statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT lusan statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT ferradastroitinoj statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT ferradastroitinos statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT mangiarottif statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT principer statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT willeringg statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT duarteramosd statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT ballarinoa statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT russenschucks statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT devreda statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT bednarekm statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT rodriguezmateosf statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT stateram statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT priolim statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT sorbim statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT mariottos statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT farinons statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT bersania statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT caiffib statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT fabbricatorep statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT levif statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT pampalonia statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT toralf statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT martinsc statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT matosjgarcia statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT nakamotot statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT suganom statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT suzukik statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT xuq statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT wangy statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT weiw statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT apollinarig statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT carcagnor statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT fehers statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT ambrosiog statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT baldinim statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT yum statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT nobregaa statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT vourisa statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT chlachidzeg statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT stoynevs statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT ammk statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT schmalzlej statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT anarellam statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT muratorej statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT yahiaaben statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT joship statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT ferracinp statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT prestemons statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT chengd statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT strausst statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc AT cooleyl statusandchallengesoftheinteractionregionmagnetsforhllhc |