Cargando…

Could a Kilonova Kill: a Threat Assessment

Binary neutron star mergers (BNS) produce high-energy emissions from several physically different sources, including a gamma-ray burst (GRB) and its afterglow, a kilonova, and, at late times, a remnant many parsecs in size. Ionizing radiation from these sources can be dangerous for life on Earth-lik...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perkins, Haille M.L., Ellis, John, Fields, Brian D., Hartmann, Dieter H., Liu, Zhenghai, McLaughlin, Gail C., Surman, Rebecca, Wang, Xilu
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/2876297
_version_ 1780978935908007936
author Perkins, Haille M.L.
Ellis, John
Fields, Brian D.
Hartmann, Dieter H.
Liu, Zhenghai
McLaughlin, Gail C.
Surman, Rebecca
Wang, Xilu
author_facet Perkins, Haille M.L.
Ellis, John
Fields, Brian D.
Hartmann, Dieter H.
Liu, Zhenghai
McLaughlin, Gail C.
Surman, Rebecca
Wang, Xilu
author_sort Perkins, Haille M.L.
collection CERN
description Binary neutron star mergers (BNS) produce high-energy emissions from several physically different sources, including a gamma-ray burst (GRB) and its afterglow, a kilonova, and, at late times, a remnant many parsecs in size. Ionizing radiation from these sources can be dangerous for life on Earth-like planets when located too close. Work to date has explored the substantial danger posed by the GRB to on-axis observers: here we focus instead on the potential threats posed to nearby off-axis observers. Our analysis is based largely on observations of the GW 170817/GRB 170817A multi-messenger event, as well as theoretical predictions. For baseline kilonova parameters, we find that the X-ray emission from the afterglow may be lethal out to $\sim 5$ pc and the off-axis gamma-ray emission may threaten a range out to $\sim 4$ pc, whereas the greatest threat comes years after the explosion, from the cosmic rays accelerated by the kilonova blast, which can be lethal out to distances up to $\sim 11$ pc. The distances quoted here are typical, but the values have significant uncertainties and depend on the viewing angle, ejected mass, and explosion energy in ways we quantify. Assessing the overall threat to Earth-like planets, have a similar kill distance to supernovae, but are far less common. However, our results rely on the scant available kilonova data, and multi-messenger observations will clarify the danger posed by such events.
id cern-2876297
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2023
record_format invenio
spelling cern-28762972023-10-21T02:26:00Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2876297engPerkins, Haille M.L.Ellis, JohnFields, Brian D.Hartmann, Dieter H.Liu, ZhenghaiMcLaughlin, Gail C.Surman, RebeccaWang, XiluCould a Kilonova Kill: a Threat Assessmentastro-ph.SRAstrophysics and Astronomyastro-ph.HEAstrophysics and AstronomyBinary neutron star mergers (BNS) produce high-energy emissions from several physically different sources, including a gamma-ray burst (GRB) and its afterglow, a kilonova, and, at late times, a remnant many parsecs in size. Ionizing radiation from these sources can be dangerous for life on Earth-like planets when located too close. Work to date has explored the substantial danger posed by the GRB to on-axis observers: here we focus instead on the potential threats posed to nearby off-axis observers. Our analysis is based largely on observations of the GW 170817/GRB 170817A multi-messenger event, as well as theoretical predictions. For baseline kilonova parameters, we find that the X-ray emission from the afterglow may be lethal out to $\sim 5$ pc and the off-axis gamma-ray emission may threaten a range out to $\sim 4$ pc, whereas the greatest threat comes years after the explosion, from the cosmic rays accelerated by the kilonova blast, which can be lethal out to distances up to $\sim 11$ pc. The distances quoted here are typical, but the values have significant uncertainties and depend on the viewing angle, ejected mass, and explosion energy in ways we quantify. Assessing the overall threat to Earth-like planets, have a similar kill distance to supernovae, but are far less common. However, our results rely on the scant available kilonova data, and multi-messenger observations will clarify the danger posed by such events.KCL-PH-TH/2023-55CERN-TH-2023-190arXiv:2310.11627oai:cds.cern.ch:28762972023-10-17
spellingShingle astro-ph.SR
Astrophysics and Astronomy
astro-ph.HE
Astrophysics and Astronomy
Perkins, Haille M.L.
Ellis, John
Fields, Brian D.
Hartmann, Dieter H.
Liu, Zhenghai
McLaughlin, Gail C.
Surman, Rebecca
Wang, Xilu
Could a Kilonova Kill: a Threat Assessment
title Could a Kilonova Kill: a Threat Assessment
title_full Could a Kilonova Kill: a Threat Assessment
title_fullStr Could a Kilonova Kill: a Threat Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Could a Kilonova Kill: a Threat Assessment
title_short Could a Kilonova Kill: a Threat Assessment
title_sort could a kilonova kill: a threat assessment
topic astro-ph.SR
Astrophysics and Astronomy
astro-ph.HE
Astrophysics and Astronomy
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/2876297
work_keys_str_mv AT perkinshailleml couldakilonovakillathreatassessment
AT ellisjohn couldakilonovakillathreatassessment
AT fieldsbriand couldakilonovakillathreatassessment
AT hartmanndieterh couldakilonovakillathreatassessment
AT liuzhenghai couldakilonovakillathreatassessment
AT mclaughlingailc couldakilonovakillathreatassessment
AT surmanrebecca couldakilonovakillathreatassessment
AT wangxilu couldakilonovakillathreatassessment