Cargando…

On Deep-Ocean $^{60}Fe$ as a Fossil of a Near-Earth Supernova

Live $^{60}$Fe has recently been reported in a deep-ocean ferromanganese crust. Analysis of the isotopic ratios in the sample suggests that the measured $^{60}$Fe abundance exceeds the levels generated by terrestrial and cosmogenic sources, and it has been proposed that the excess of $^{60}$Fe is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fields, Brian D., Ellis, John R.
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1384-1076(99)00034-2
http://cds.cern.ch/record/372621
_version_ 1780893179191492608
author Fields, Brian D.
Ellis, John R.
author_facet Fields, Brian D.
Ellis, John R.
author_sort Fields, Brian D.
collection CERN
description Live $^{60}$Fe has recently been reported in a deep-ocean ferromanganese crust. Analysis of the isotopic ratios in the sample suggests that the measured $^{60}$Fe abundance exceeds the levels generated by terrestrial and cosmogenic sources, and it has been proposed that the excess of $^{60}$Fe is a signature of a supernova that exploded near the earth several Myr ago. In this paper, we consider the possible background sources, and confirm that the measured $^{60}$Fe is significantly higher than all known backgrounds, in contrast with the reported abundance of live $^{53}$Mn. We discuss scenarios in which the data are consistent with a supernova event at a distance $D \sim 30$ pc and an epoch $t_{\rm SN} \sim 5$ Myr ago. We propose tests that could confirm or refute the interpretation of the $^{60}$Fe discovery, including searches for $^{10}$Be, $^{129}$I and $^{146}$Sm. Such a nearby supernova event might have had some impact on the earth's biosphere, principally by enhancing the cosmic-ray flux. This might have damaged the earth's ozone layer, enhancing the penetration of solar ultraviolet radiation. In this connection, we comment on the Middle Miocene and Pliocene mini-extinction events. We also speculate on the possibility of a supernova-induced "cosmic-ray winter," if cosmic rays play a significant role in seeding cloud formation.
id cern-372621
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 1998
record_format invenio
spelling cern-3726212023-10-20T02:29:49Zdoi:10.1016/S1384-1076(99)00034-2http://cds.cern.ch/record/372621engFields, Brian D.Ellis, John R.On Deep-Ocean $^{60}Fe$ as a Fossil of a Near-Earth SupernovaAstrophysics and AstronomyLive $^{60}$Fe has recently been reported in a deep-ocean ferromanganese crust. Analysis of the isotopic ratios in the sample suggests that the measured $^{60}$Fe abundance exceeds the levels generated by terrestrial and cosmogenic sources, and it has been proposed that the excess of $^{60}$Fe is a signature of a supernova that exploded near the earth several Myr ago. In this paper, we consider the possible background sources, and confirm that the measured $^{60}$Fe is significantly higher than all known backgrounds, in contrast with the reported abundance of live $^{53}$Mn. We discuss scenarios in which the data are consistent with a supernova event at a distance $D \sim 30$ pc and an epoch $t_{\rm SN} \sim 5$ Myr ago. We propose tests that could confirm or refute the interpretation of the $^{60}$Fe discovery, including searches for $^{10}$Be, $^{129}$I and $^{146}$Sm. Such a nearby supernova event might have had some impact on the earth's biosphere, principally by enhancing the cosmic-ray flux. This might have damaged the earth's ozone layer, enhancing the penetration of solar ultraviolet radiation. In this connection, we comment on the Middle Miocene and Pliocene mini-extinction events. We also speculate on the possibility of a supernova-induced "cosmic-ray winter," if cosmic rays play a significant role in seeding cloud formation.Live $^{60}$Fe has recently been reported in a deep-ocean ferromanganese crust. Analysis of the isotopic ratios in the sample suggests that the measured $^{60}$Fe abundance exceeds the levels generated by terrestrial and cosmogenic sources, and it has been proposed that the excess of $^{60}$Fe is a signature of a supernova that exploded near the earth several Myr ago. In this paper, we consider the possible background sources, and confirm that the measured $^{60}$Fe is significantly higher than all known backgrounds, in contrast with the reported abundance of live $^{53}$Mn. We discuss scenarios in which the data are consistent with a supernova event at a distance $D \sim 30$ pc and an epoch $t_{\rm SN} \sim 5$ Myr ago. We propose tests that could confirm or refute the interpretation of the $^{60}$Fe discovery, including searches for $^{10}$Be, $^{129}$I and $^{146}$Sm. Such a nearby supernova event might have had some impact on the earth's biosphere, principally by enhancing the cosmic-ray flux. This might have damaged the earth's ozone layer, enhancing the penetration of solar ultraviolet radiation. In this connection, we comment on the Middle Miocene and Pliocene mini-extinction events. We also speculate on the possibility of a supernova-induced cosmic-ray winter, if cosmic rays play a significant role in seeding cloud formation.astro-ph/9811457CERN-TH-98-373CERN-TH-98-373oai:cds.cern.ch:3726211998-12-01
spellingShingle Astrophysics and Astronomy
Fields, Brian D.
Ellis, John R.
On Deep-Ocean $^{60}Fe$ as a Fossil of a Near-Earth Supernova
title On Deep-Ocean $^{60}Fe$ as a Fossil of a Near-Earth Supernova
title_full On Deep-Ocean $^{60}Fe$ as a Fossil of a Near-Earth Supernova
title_fullStr On Deep-Ocean $^{60}Fe$ as a Fossil of a Near-Earth Supernova
title_full_unstemmed On Deep-Ocean $^{60}Fe$ as a Fossil of a Near-Earth Supernova
title_short On Deep-Ocean $^{60}Fe$ as a Fossil of a Near-Earth Supernova
title_sort on deep-ocean $^{60}fe$ as a fossil of a near-earth supernova
topic Astrophysics and Astronomy
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1384-1076(99)00034-2
http://cds.cern.ch/record/372621
work_keys_str_mv AT fieldsbriand ondeepocean60feasafossilofanearearthsupernova
AT ellisjohnr ondeepocean60feasafossilofanearearthsupernova