Cargando…

Superconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technology

Evidence is presented for niobium film cavities performing as well as niobium bulk cavities, at variance with a widespread belief that their much smaller grain size should be a fundamental limitation preventing high quality factors to be maintained over a wide range of accelerating fields. By compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arbet-Engels, V P, Benvenuti, Cristoforo, Calatroni, Sergio, Darriulat, Pierre, Peck, M A, Valente, A M, Van't Hof, C A
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00165-6
http://cds.cern.ch/record/508322
_version_ 1780897439494963200
author Arbet-Engels, V P
Benvenuti, Cristoforo
Calatroni, Sergio
Darriulat, Pierre
Peck, M A
Valente, A M
Van't Hof, C A
author_facet Arbet-Engels, V P
Benvenuti, Cristoforo
Calatroni, Sergio
Darriulat, Pierre
Peck, M A
Valente, A M
Van't Hof, C A
author_sort Arbet-Engels, V P
collection CERN
description Evidence is presented for niobium film cavities performing as well as niobium bulk cavities, at variance with a widespread belief that their much smaller grain size should be a fundamental limitation preventing high quality factors to be maintained over a wide range of accelerating fields. By comparing the relative merits of the bulk and film technologies, a strong case is presented in favour of the latter. (19 refs).
id cern-508322
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2001
record_format invenio
spelling cern-5083222019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00165-6http://cds.cern.ch/record/508322engArbet-Engels, V PBenvenuti, CristoforoCalatroni, SergioDarriulat, PierrePeck, M AValente, A MVan't Hof, C ASuperconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technologyEngineeringEvidence is presented for niobium film cavities performing as well as niobium bulk cavities, at variance with a widespread belief that their much smaller grain size should be a fundamental limitation preventing high quality factors to be maintained over a wide range of accelerating fields. By comparing the relative merits of the bulk and film technologies, a strong case is presented in favour of the latter. (19 refs).oai:cds.cern.ch:5083222001
spellingShingle Engineering
Arbet-Engels, V P
Benvenuti, Cristoforo
Calatroni, Sergio
Darriulat, Pierre
Peck, M A
Valente, A M
Van't Hof, C A
Superconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technology
title Superconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technology
title_full Superconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technology
title_fullStr Superconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technology
title_full_unstemmed Superconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technology
title_short Superconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technology
title_sort superconducting niobium cavities, a case for the film technology
topic Engineering
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00165-6
http://cds.cern.ch/record/508322
work_keys_str_mv AT arbetengelsvp superconductingniobiumcavitiesacaseforthefilmtechnology
AT benvenuticristoforo superconductingniobiumcavitiesacaseforthefilmtechnology
AT calatronisergio superconductingniobiumcavitiesacaseforthefilmtechnology
AT darriulatpierre superconductingniobiumcavitiesacaseforthefilmtechnology
AT peckma superconductingniobiumcavitiesacaseforthefilmtechnology
AT valenteam superconductingniobiumcavitiesacaseforthefilmtechnology
AT vanthofca superconductingniobiumcavitiesacaseforthefilmtechnology