Cargando…

A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTs

The determination of the most straightforward evidence for the existence of the Superworld requires a guide for non-experts (especially experimental physicists) for them to make their own judgement on the value of such predictions. For this purpose we review the most basic results of Super-Grand uni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez, Jorge L., Nanopoulos, Dimitri V., Zichichi, A.
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02724510
http://cds.cern.ch/record/562488
_version_ 1780899109068079104
author Lopez, Jorge L.
Nanopoulos, Dimitri V.
Zichichi, A.
author_facet Lopez, Jorge L.
Nanopoulos, Dimitri V.
Zichichi, A.
author_sort Lopez, Jorge L.
collection CERN
description The determination of the most straightforward evidence for the existence of the Superworld requires a guide for non-experts (especially experimental physicists) for them to make their own judgement on the value of such predictions. For this purpose we review the most basic results of Super-Grand unification in a simple and clear way. We focus the attention on two specific models and their predictions. These two models represent an example of a direct comparison between a traditional unified-theory and a string-inspired approach to the solution of the many open problems of the Standard Model. We emphasize that viable models must satisfy {\em all} available experimental constraints and be as simple as theoretically possible. The two well defined supergravity models, $SU(5)$ and $SU(5)\times U(1)$, can be described in terms of only a few parameters (five and three respectively) instead of the more than twenty needed in the MSSM model, \ie, the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model. A case of special interest is the strict no-scale $SU(5)\times U(1)$ supergravity where all predictions depend on only one parameter (plus the top-quark mass). A general consequence of these analyses is that supersymmetric particles can be at the verge of discovery, lurking around the corner at present and near future facilities. This review should help anyone distinguish between well motivated predictions and predictions based on arbitrary choices of parameters in undefined models.
id cern-562488
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 1994
record_format invenio
spelling cern-5624882023-03-14T20:46:17Zdoi:10.1007/BF02724510http://cds.cern.ch/record/562488engLopez, Jorge L.Nanopoulos, Dimitri V.Zichichi, A.A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTsParticle Physics - PhenomenologyThe determination of the most straightforward evidence for the existence of the Superworld requires a guide for non-experts (especially experimental physicists) for them to make their own judgement on the value of such predictions. For this purpose we review the most basic results of Super-Grand unification in a simple and clear way. We focus the attention on two specific models and their predictions. These two models represent an example of a direct comparison between a traditional unified-theory and a string-inspired approach to the solution of the many open problems of the Standard Model. We emphasize that viable models must satisfy {\em all} available experimental constraints and be as simple as theoretically possible. The two well defined supergravity models, $SU(5)$ and $SU(5)\times U(1)$, can be described in terms of only a few parameters (five and three respectively) instead of the more than twenty needed in the MSSM model, \ie, the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model. A case of special interest is the strict no-scale $SU(5)\times U(1)$ supergravity where all predictions depend on only one parameter (plus the top-quark mass). A general consequence of these analyses is that supersymmetric particles can be at the verge of discovery, lurking around the corner at present and near future facilities. This review should help anyone distinguish between well motivated predictions and predictions based on arbitrary choices of parameters in undefined models.The determination of the most straightforward evidence for the existence of the Superworld requires a guide for non-experts (especially experimental physicists) for them to make their own judgement on the value of such predictions. For this purpose we review the most basic results of Super-Grand unification in a simple and clear way. We focus the attention on two specific models and their predictions. These two models represent an example of a direct comparison between a traditional unified-theory and a string-inspired approach to the solution of the many open problems of the Standard Model. We emphasize that viable models must satisfy {\em all} available experimental constraints and be as simple as theoretically possible. The two well defined supergravity models, $SU(5)$ and $SU(5)\times U(1)$, can be described in terms of only a few parameters (five and three respectively) instead of the more than twenty needed in the MSSM model, \ie, the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model. A case of special interest is the strict no-scale $SU(5)\times U(1)$ supergravity where all predictions depend on only one parameter (plus the top-quark mass). A general consequence of these analyses is that supersymmetric particles can be at the verge of discovery, lurking around the corner at present and near future facilities. This review should help anyone distinguish between well motivated predictions and predictions based on arbitrary choices of parameters in undefined models.The determination of the most straightforward evidence for the existence of the Superworld requires a guide for non-experts (especially experimental physicists) for them to make their own judgement on the value of such predictions. For this purpose we review the most basic results of Super-Grand unification in a simple and clear way. We focus the attention on two specific models and their predictions. These two models represent an example of a direct comparison between a traditional unified-theory and a string-inspired approach to the solution of the many open problems of the Standard Model. We emphasize that viable models must satisfy {\em all} available experimental constraints and be as simple as theoretically possible. The two well defined supergravity models, $SU(5)$ and $SU(5)\times U(1)$, can be described in terms of only a few parameters (five and three respectively) instead of the more than twenty needed in the MSSM model, \ie, the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model. A case of special interest is the strict no-scale $SU(5)\times U(1)$ supergravity where all predictions depend on only one parameter (plus the top-quark mass). A general consequence of these analyses is that supersymmetric particles can be at the verge of discovery, lurking around the corner at present and near future facilities. This review should help anyone distinguish between well motivated predictions and predictions based on arbitrary choices of parameters in undefined models.hep-ph/9311241CERN-TH-7077-93CERN-LAA-93-29CTP-TAMU-65-93CERN-PPE-93-195ACT-22-93oai:cds.cern.ch:5624881994
spellingShingle Particle Physics - Phenomenology
Lopez, Jorge L.
Nanopoulos, Dimitri V.
Zichichi, A.
A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTs
title A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTs
title_full A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTs
title_fullStr A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTs
title_full_unstemmed A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTs
title_short A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTs
title_sort layman's guide to susy guts
topic Particle Physics - Phenomenology
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02724510
http://cds.cern.ch/record/562488
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezjorgel alaymansguidetosusyguts
AT nanopoulosdimitriv alaymansguidetosusyguts
AT zichichia alaymansguidetosusyguts
AT lopezjorgel laymansguidetosusyguts
AT nanopoulosdimitriv laymansguidetosusyguts
AT zichichia laymansguidetosusyguts