Cargando…

The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity

Recent attempts to resolve the ambiguity in the loop quantum gravity description of the quantization of area has led to the idea that j=1 edges of spin-networks dominate in their contribution to black hole areas as opposed to j=1/2 which would naively be expected. This suggests that the true gauge g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Swain, J D
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218271803003955
http://cds.cern.ch/record/617695
_version_ 1780900310197207040
author Swain, J D
author_facet Swain, J D
author_sort Swain, J D
collection CERN
description Recent attempts to resolve the ambiguity in the loop quantum gravity description of the quantization of area has led to the idea that j=1 edges of spin-networks dominate in their contribution to black hole areas as opposed to j=1/2 which would naively be expected. This suggests that the true gauge group involved might be SO(3) rather than SU(2) with attendant difficulties. We argue that the assumption that a version of the Pauli principle is present in loop quantum gravity allows one to maintain SU(2) as the gauge group while still naturally achieving the desired suppression of spin-1/2 punctures. Areas come from j=1 punctures rather than j=1/2 punctures for much the same reason that photons lead to macroscopic classically observable fields while electrons do not.
id cern-617695
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2003
record_format invenio
spelling cern-6176952019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1142/S0218271803003955http://cds.cern.ch/record/617695engSwain, J DThe Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum GravityGeneral Relativity and CosmologyRecent attempts to resolve the ambiguity in the loop quantum gravity description of the quantization of area has led to the idea that j=1 edges of spin-networks dominate in their contribution to black hole areas as opposed to j=1/2 which would naively be expected. This suggests that the true gauge group involved might be SO(3) rather than SU(2) with attendant difficulties. We argue that the assumption that a version of the Pauli principle is present in loop quantum gravity allows one to maintain SU(2) as the gauge group while still naturally achieving the desired suppression of spin-1/2 punctures. Areas come from j=1 punctures rather than j=1/2 punctures for much the same reason that photons lead to macroscopic classically observable fields while electrons do not.gr-qc/0305073oai:cds.cern.ch:6176952003-05-19
spellingShingle General Relativity and Cosmology
Swain, J D
The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity
title The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity
title_full The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity
title_fullStr The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity
title_full_unstemmed The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity
title_short The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity
title_sort pauli exclusion principle and su(2) vs. so(3) in loop quantum gravity
topic General Relativity and Cosmology
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218271803003955
http://cds.cern.ch/record/617695
work_keys_str_mv AT swainjd thepauliexclusionprincipleandsu2vsso3inloopquantumgravity
AT swainjd pauliexclusionprincipleandsu2vsso3inloopquantumgravity