Cargando…
Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC Beam-Collimation System Performance
This report describes studies performed in the framework of the Collimation Task Force organized to support the work of the second International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee. The post-linac beam-collimation systems in the TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC linear-collider designs are compared usi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/619025 |
_version_ | 1780900330870931456 |
---|---|
author | Walker, N Kozanecki, Witold Napoly, O Schulte, Daniel Zimmermann, Frank Drozhdin, A I Mokhov, N V Keller, L Markiewicz, T W Maruyama, T Raubenheimer, T O Seryi, Andrei Tenenbaum, P G Woodley, M Blair, G A |
author_facet | Walker, N Kozanecki, Witold Napoly, O Schulte, Daniel Zimmermann, Frank Drozhdin, A I Mokhov, N V Keller, L Markiewicz, T W Maruyama, T Raubenheimer, T O Seryi, Andrei Tenenbaum, P G Woodley, M Blair, G A |
author_sort | Walker, N |
collection | CERN |
description | This report describes studies performed in the framework of the Collimation Task Force organized to support the work of the second International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee. The post-linac beam-collimation systems in the TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC linear-collider designs are compared using the same computer code under the same assumptions. Their performance is quantified in terms of beam-halo and synchrotron-radiation collimation efficiency. The performance of the current designs varies across projects, and does not always meet the original design goals. But these comparisons suggest that achieving the required performance in a future linear collider is feasible. |
id | cern-619025 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2003 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | cern-6190252023-08-17T09:45:22Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/619025engWalker, NKozanecki, WitoldNapoly, OSchulte, DanielZimmermann, FrankDrozhdin, A IMokhov, N VKeller, LMarkiewicz, T WMaruyama, TRaubenheimer, T OSeryi, AndreiTenenbaum, P GWoodley, MBlair, G AComparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC Beam-Collimation System PerformanceAccelerators and Storage RingsThis report describes studies performed in the framework of the Collimation Task Force organized to support the work of the second International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee. The post-linac beam-collimation systems in the TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC linear-collider designs are compared using the same computer code under the same assumptions. Their performance is quantified in terms of beam-halo and synchrotron-radiation collimation efficiency. The performance of the current designs varies across projects, and does not always meet the original design goals. But these comparisons suggest that achieving the required performance in a future linear collider is feasible.CERN-AB-2003-038-ABPCLIC-Note-586oai:cds.cern.ch:6190252003-05-22 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Walker, N Kozanecki, Witold Napoly, O Schulte, Daniel Zimmermann, Frank Drozhdin, A I Mokhov, N V Keller, L Markiewicz, T W Maruyama, T Raubenheimer, T O Seryi, Andrei Tenenbaum, P G Woodley, M Blair, G A Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC Beam-Collimation System Performance |
title | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC Beam-Collimation System Performance |
title_full | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC Beam-Collimation System Performance |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC Beam-Collimation System Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC Beam-Collimation System Performance |
title_short | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC Beam-Collimation System Performance |
title_sort | comparison of the tesla, nlc and clic beam-collimation system performance |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | http://cds.cern.ch/record/619025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkern comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT kozaneckiwitold comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT napolyo comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT schultedaniel comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT zimmermannfrank comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT drozhdinai comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT mokhovnv comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT kellerl comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT markiewicztw comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT maruyamat comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT raubenheimerto comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT seryiandrei comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT tenenbaumpg comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT woodleym comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT blairga comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance |