Cargando…

Comparisons of the CODD and of the Normaliser Systems For Closed Orbit Measurements in the PS

The PS ring is equipped with 40 position PUs distributed around the ring. These are connected to the CODD system, which performs trajectory measurements of any single bunch, on two consecutive turns, and to 40 Normalisers, which deliver an averaged orbit. CODD uses a beam-synchronous timing system,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belleman, J, González, J L, Ludwig, M, Potier, J P, Steerenberg, R
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/705620
_version_ 1780902444284248064
author Belleman, J
González, J L
Ludwig, M
Potier, J P
Steerenberg, R
author_facet Belleman, J
González, J L
Ludwig, M
Potier, J P
Steerenberg, R
author_sort Belleman, J
collection CERN
description The PS ring is equipped with 40 position PUs distributed around the ring. These are connected to the CODD system, which performs trajectory measurements of any single bunch, on two consecutive turns, and to 40 Normalisers, which deliver an averaged orbit. CODD uses a beam-synchronous timing system, which tracks a given bunch all through the acceleration cycle, but needs resynchronization after harmonic changes. It measures at injection or at any given C-timing, albeit with no less than 5ms between acquisitions. It is blind during harmonic changes. A Normaliser, using a technique originally developed for radial loop control, produces a slow signal, proportional to the average position of the bunches. At beam injection a settling time of 1.5ms is needed; then it follows orbit changes with a 200us time constant. Thus, it will not show rapid position changes, such as betatron oscillations. It does not require accurate timing. In the PS installation, the Normaliser outputs are simply sampled at 1ms intervals. CODD affords measurements on single bunches right from injection, but needs a complicated timing system and delivers results with mediocre resolution. The Normaliser, on the other hand, has simple timing, but produces the average orbit over the whole beam over a few hundred microseconds, thus missing the injection event. The averaging lends it a better resolution than CODD, though not by as much as could have been expected, based on its time constants. The aim of this document is to compare both systems and show the superiority of the Normaliser for closed-orbit measurements.
id cern-705620
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2004
record_format invenio
spelling cern-7056202023-02-17T10:08:12Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/705620engBelleman, JGonzález, J LLudwig, MPotier, J PSteerenberg, RComparisons of the CODD and of the Normaliser Systems For Closed Orbit Measurements in the PSAccelerators and Storage RingsThe PS ring is equipped with 40 position PUs distributed around the ring. These are connected to the CODD system, which performs trajectory measurements of any single bunch, on two consecutive turns, and to 40 Normalisers, which deliver an averaged orbit. CODD uses a beam-synchronous timing system, which tracks a given bunch all through the acceleration cycle, but needs resynchronization after harmonic changes. It measures at injection or at any given C-timing, albeit with no less than 5ms between acquisitions. It is blind during harmonic changes. A Normaliser, using a technique originally developed for radial loop control, produces a slow signal, proportional to the average position of the bunches. At beam injection a settling time of 1.5ms is needed; then it follows orbit changes with a 200us time constant. Thus, it will not show rapid position changes, such as betatron oscillations. It does not require accurate timing. In the PS installation, the Normaliser outputs are simply sampled at 1ms intervals. CODD affords measurements on single bunches right from injection, but needs a complicated timing system and delivers results with mediocre resolution. The Normaliser, on the other hand, has simple timing, but produces the average orbit over the whole beam over a few hundred microseconds, thus missing the injection event. The averaging lends it a better resolution than CODD, though not by as much as could have been expected, based on its time constants. The aim of this document is to compare both systems and show the superiority of the Normaliser for closed-orbit measurements.AB-Note-2004-003-BDIoai:cds.cern.ch:7056202004-02-04
spellingShingle Accelerators and Storage Rings
Belleman, J
González, J L
Ludwig, M
Potier, J P
Steerenberg, R
Comparisons of the CODD and of the Normaliser Systems For Closed Orbit Measurements in the PS
title Comparisons of the CODD and of the Normaliser Systems For Closed Orbit Measurements in the PS
title_full Comparisons of the CODD and of the Normaliser Systems For Closed Orbit Measurements in the PS
title_fullStr Comparisons of the CODD and of the Normaliser Systems For Closed Orbit Measurements in the PS
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of the CODD and of the Normaliser Systems For Closed Orbit Measurements in the PS
title_short Comparisons of the CODD and of the Normaliser Systems For Closed Orbit Measurements in the PS
title_sort comparisons of the codd and of the normaliser systems for closed orbit measurements in the ps
topic Accelerators and Storage Rings
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/705620
work_keys_str_mv AT bellemanj comparisonsofthecoddandofthenormalisersystemsforclosedorbitmeasurementsintheps
AT gonzalezjl comparisonsofthecoddandofthenormalisersystemsforclosedorbitmeasurementsintheps
AT ludwigm comparisonsofthecoddandofthenormalisersystemsforclosedorbitmeasurementsintheps
AT potierjp comparisonsofthecoddandofthenormalisersystemsforclosedorbitmeasurementsintheps
AT steerenbergr comparisonsofthecoddandofthenormalisersystemsforclosedorbitmeasurementsintheps