Cargando…

Why the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientists

Stephen Hawking has bet $100 that the Higgs boson will not be discovered. As a result, he has been heavily criticized by Peter Higgs, who first hypothesized the particles existence in the 1960s (1 page).

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Linklater, M
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/717159
_version_ 1780903196527427584
author Linklater, M
author_facet Linklater, M
author_sort Linklater, M
collection CERN
description Stephen Hawking has bet $100 that the Higgs boson will not be discovered. As a result, he has been heavily criticized by Peter Higgs, who first hypothesized the particles existence in the 1960s (1 page).
id cern-717159
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2002
record_format invenio
spelling cern-7171592019-09-30T06:29:59Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/717159engLinklater, MWhy the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientistsPeopleStephen Hawking has bet $100 that the Higgs boson will not be discovered. As a result, he has been heavily criticized by Peter Higgs, who first hypothesized the particles existence in the 1960s (1 page).PRESSCUT-2002-218oai:cds.cern.ch:7171592002
spellingShingle People
Linklater, M
Why the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientists
title Why the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientists
title_full Why the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientists
title_fullStr Why the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientists
title_full_unstemmed Why the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientists
title_short Why the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientists
title_sort why the matter of matter should matter to more than two eminent scientists
topic People
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/717159
work_keys_str_mv AT linklaterm whythematterofmattershouldmattertomorethantwoeminentscientists