Cargando…

Calculating LHC Tuning Knobs using Various Methods

By measuring and adjusting the beta-functions at the IP the luminosity is being optimized. In LEP this was done with the two closest doublet magnets. This approach is not applicable for the LHC due to the asymmetric lattice and common beam pipe through the triplet magnets. To control and change the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wittmer, W, Schulte, Daniel, Zimmermann, Frank
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://cds.cern.ch/record/793438
_version_ 1780904582894845952
author Wittmer, W
Schulte, Daniel
Zimmermann, Frank
author_facet Wittmer, W
Schulte, Daniel
Zimmermann, Frank
author_sort Wittmer, W
collection CERN
description By measuring and adjusting the beta-functions at the IP the luminosity is being optimized. In LEP this was done with the two closest doublet magnets. This approach is not applicable for the LHC due to the asymmetric lattice and common beam pipe through the triplet magnets. To control and change the beta-functions quadrupole groups situated on both sides further away from the IP have to be used where the two beams are already separated. The quadrupoles are excited in specific linear combinations, forming the socalled “tuning knobs” for the IP beta functions. We compare the performance of such knobs calculated by different methods: (1) matching in MAD, (2) inversion of the response matrix and singular value decomposition inversion and conditioning and (3) conditioning the response matrix by multidimensional minimization using an Adapted Moore Penrose Method.
id cern-793438
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2004
record_format invenio
spelling cern-7934382023-05-31T13:22:19Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/793438engWittmer, WSchulte, DanielZimmermann, FrankCalculating LHC Tuning Knobs using Various MethodsAccelerators and Storage RingsBy measuring and adjusting the beta-functions at the IP the luminosity is being optimized. In LEP this was done with the two closest doublet magnets. This approach is not applicable for the LHC due to the asymmetric lattice and common beam pipe through the triplet magnets. To control and change the beta-functions quadrupole groups situated on both sides further away from the IP have to be used where the two beams are already separated. The quadrupoles are excited in specific linear combinations, forming the socalled “tuning knobs” for the IP beta functions. We compare the performance of such knobs calculated by different methods: (1) matching in MAD, (2) inversion of the response matrix and singular value decomposition inversion and conditioning and (3) conditioning the response matrix by multidimensional minimization using an Adapted Moore Penrose Method.LHC-Project-Report-778CERN-LHC-Project-Report-778oai:cds.cern.ch:7934382004-08-17
spellingShingle Accelerators and Storage Rings
Wittmer, W
Schulte, Daniel
Zimmermann, Frank
Calculating LHC Tuning Knobs using Various Methods
title Calculating LHC Tuning Knobs using Various Methods
title_full Calculating LHC Tuning Knobs using Various Methods
title_fullStr Calculating LHC Tuning Knobs using Various Methods
title_full_unstemmed Calculating LHC Tuning Knobs using Various Methods
title_short Calculating LHC Tuning Knobs using Various Methods
title_sort calculating lhc tuning knobs using various methods
topic Accelerators and Storage Rings
url http://cds.cern.ch/record/793438
work_keys_str_mv AT wittmerw calculatinglhctuningknobsusingvariousmethods
AT schultedaniel calculatinglhctuningknobsusingvariousmethods
AT zimmermannfrank calculatinglhctuningknobsusingvariousmethods