Performance comparison of the LCG2 and gLite file catalogues

When the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) begins operation at CERN in 2007 it will produce data in volumes never before seen. The LHC Computing Grid will provide the middleware necessary to distribute and analyse petabytes of this data. One of the critical factors in the smooth running of this system is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munro, Craig, Koblitz, Birger
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2006
Materias:
Computing and Computers
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.11.103
http://cds.cern.ch/record/941990
_version_ 1780909822906990592
author Munro, Craig
Koblitz, Birger
author_facet Munro, Craig
Koblitz, Birger
author_sort Munro, Craig
collection CERN
description When the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) begins operation at CERN in 2007 it will produce data in volumes never before seen. The LHC Computing Grid will provide the middleware necessary to distribute and analyse petabytes of this data. One of the critical factors in the smooth running of this system is the performance of the file catalogues which translate logical filenames into physical locations. We present a detailed study comparing the LCG project's catalogue with the gLite FiReMan catalogue developed in the EGEE project, covering performance and respective merits and shortcomings.
id cern-941990
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2006
record_format invenio
spelling cern-9419902019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1016/j.nima.2005.11.103http://cds.cern.ch/record/941990engMunro, CraigKoblitz, BirgerPerformance comparison of the LCG2 and gLite file cataloguesComputing and ComputersWhen the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) begins operation at CERN in 2007 it will produce data in volumes never before seen. The LHC Computing Grid will provide the middleware necessary to distribute and analyse petabytes of this data. One of the critical factors in the smooth running of this system is the performance of the file catalogues which translate logical filenames into physical locations. We present a detailed study comparing the LCG project's catalogue with the gLite FiReMan catalogue developed in the EGEE project, covering performance and respective merits and shortcomings.EGEE-PUB-2005-023EGEE-PUB-2006-025oai:cds.cern.ch:9419902006
spellingShingle Computing and Computers
Munro, Craig
Koblitz, Birger
Performance comparison of the LCG2 and gLite file catalogues
title Performance comparison of the LCG2 and gLite file catalogues
title_full Performance comparison of the LCG2 and gLite file catalogues
title_fullStr Performance comparison of the LCG2 and gLite file catalogues
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison of the LCG2 and gLite file catalogues
title_short Performance comparison of the LCG2 and gLite file catalogues
title_sort performance comparison of the lcg2 and glite file catalogues
topic Computing and Computers
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.11.103
http://cds.cern.ch/record/941990
work_keys_str_mv AT munrocraig performancecomparisonofthelcg2andglitefilecatalogues
AT koblitzbirger performancecomparisonofthelcg2andglitefilecatalogues

Ejemplares similares