Cargando…
Beam Loss Monitoring for LHC Machine Protection
The energy stored in the nominal LHC beams is two times 362 MJ, 100 times the energy of the Tevatron. As little as 1 mJ/cm 3 deposited energy quenches a magnet at 7 TeV and 1 J/cm 3 causes magnet damage. The beam dumps are the only places to safely dispose of this beam. One of the key systems for ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.04.110 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2103398 |
_version_ | 1780948799962742784 |
---|---|
author | Holzer, Eva Barbara Dehning, Bernd Effnger, Ewald Emery, Jonathan Grishin, Viatcheslav Hajdu, Csaba Jackson, Stephen Kurfuerst, Christoph Marsili, Aurelien Misiowiec, Marek Nagel, Markus Busto, Eduardo Nebot Del Nordt, Annika Roderick, Chris Sapinski, Mariusz Zamantzas, Christos |
author_facet | Holzer, Eva Barbara Dehning, Bernd Effnger, Ewald Emery, Jonathan Grishin, Viatcheslav Hajdu, Csaba Jackson, Stephen Kurfuerst, Christoph Marsili, Aurelien Misiowiec, Marek Nagel, Markus Busto, Eduardo Nebot Del Nordt, Annika Roderick, Chris Sapinski, Mariusz Zamantzas, Christos |
author_sort | Holzer, Eva Barbara |
collection | CERN |
description | The energy stored in the nominal LHC beams is two times 362 MJ, 100 times the energy of the Tevatron. As little as 1 mJ/cm 3 deposited energy quenches a magnet at 7 TeV and 1 J/cm 3 causes magnet damage. The beam dumps are the only places to safely dispose of this beam. One of the key systems for machine protection is the beam loss monitoring (BLM) system. About 3600 ionization chambers are installed at likely or critical loss locations around the LHC ring. The losses are integrated in 12 time intervals ranging from 40 μs to 84 s and compared to threshold values defined in 32 energy ranges. A beam abort is requested when potentially dangerous losses are detected or when any of the numerous internal system validation tests fails. In addition, loss data are used for machine set-up and operational verifications. The collimation system for example uses the loss data for set-up and regular performance verification. Commissioning and operational experience of the BLM are presented: The machine protection functionality of the BLM system has been fully reliable; the LHC availability has not been compromised by false beam aborts. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1313355 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2012 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-13133552022-08-10T20:15:45Zdoi:10.1016/j.phpro.2012.04.110http://cds.cern.ch/record/2103398engHolzer, Eva BarbaraDehning, BerndEffnger, EwaldEmery, JonathanGrishin, ViatcheslavHajdu, CsabaJackson, StephenKurfuerst, ChristophMarsili, AurelienMisiowiec, MarekNagel, MarkusBusto, Eduardo Nebot DelNordt, AnnikaRoderick, ChrisSapinski, MariuszZamantzas, ChristosBeam Loss Monitoring for LHC Machine ProtectionDetectors and Experimental TechniquesThe energy stored in the nominal LHC beams is two times 362 MJ, 100 times the energy of the Tevatron. As little as 1 mJ/cm 3 deposited energy quenches a magnet at 7 TeV and 1 J/cm 3 causes magnet damage. The beam dumps are the only places to safely dispose of this beam. One of the key systems for machine protection is the beam loss monitoring (BLM) system. About 3600 ionization chambers are installed at likely or critical loss locations around the LHC ring. The losses are integrated in 12 time intervals ranging from 40 μs to 84 s and compared to threshold values defined in 32 energy ranges. A beam abort is requested when potentially dangerous losses are detected or when any of the numerous internal system validation tests fails. In addition, loss data are used for machine set-up and operational verifications. The collimation system for example uses the loss data for set-up and regular performance verification. Commissioning and operational experience of the BLM are presented: The machine protection functionality of the BLM system has been fully reliable; the LHC availability has not been compromised by false beam aborts.oai:inspirehep.net:13133552012 |
spellingShingle | Detectors and Experimental Techniques Holzer, Eva Barbara Dehning, Bernd Effnger, Ewald Emery, Jonathan Grishin, Viatcheslav Hajdu, Csaba Jackson, Stephen Kurfuerst, Christoph Marsili, Aurelien Misiowiec, Marek Nagel, Markus Busto, Eduardo Nebot Del Nordt, Annika Roderick, Chris Sapinski, Mariusz Zamantzas, Christos Beam Loss Monitoring for LHC Machine Protection |
title | Beam Loss Monitoring for LHC Machine Protection |
title_full | Beam Loss Monitoring for LHC Machine Protection |
title_fullStr | Beam Loss Monitoring for LHC Machine Protection |
title_full_unstemmed | Beam Loss Monitoring for LHC Machine Protection |
title_short | Beam Loss Monitoring for LHC Machine Protection |
title_sort | beam loss monitoring for lhc machine protection |
topic | Detectors and Experimental Techniques |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.04.110 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2103398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holzerevabarbara beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT dehningbernd beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT effngerewald beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT emeryjonathan beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT grishinviatcheslav beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT hajducsaba beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT jacksonstephen beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT kurfuerstchristoph beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT marsiliaurelien beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT misiowiecmarek beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT nagelmarkus beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT bustoeduardonebotdel beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT nordtannika beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT roderickchris beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT sapinskimariusz beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection AT zamantzaschristos beamlossmonitoringforlhcmachineprotection |