Cargando…

On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance

In time of flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) and in particular for the EndoTOFPET-US Project (Frisch, 2013 [1] ), and other applications for high energy physics, the multi-digital silicon photomultiplier (MD-SiPM) was recently proposed (Mandai and Charbon, 2012 [2] ), in which the time o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gundacker, S, Auffray, E, Jarron, P, Meyer, T, Lecoq, P
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.10.020
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2162820
_version_ 1780951049254731776
author Gundacker, S
Auffray, E
Jarron, P
Meyer, T
Lecoq, P
author_facet Gundacker, S
Auffray, E
Jarron, P
Meyer, T
Lecoq, P
author_sort Gundacker, S
collection CERN
description In time of flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) and in particular for the EndoTOFPET-US Project (Frisch, 2013 [1] ), and other applications for high energy physics, the multi-digital silicon photomultiplier (MD-SiPM) was recently proposed (Mandai and Charbon, 2012 [2] ), in which the time of every single photoelectron is being recorded. If such a photodetector is coupled to a scintillator, the largest and most accurate timing information can be extracted from the cascade of the scintillation photons, and the most probable time of positron emission determined. The readout concept of the MD-SiPM is very different from that of the analog SiPM, where the individual photoelectrons are merely summed up and the output signal fed into the readout electronics. We have developed a comprehensive Monte Carlo (MC) simulation tool that describes the timing properties of the photodetector and electronics, the scintillation properties of the crystal and the light transfer within the crystal. In previous studies we have compared MC simulations with coincidence time resolution (CTR) measurements and found good agreement within less than 10% for crystals of different lengths (from 3 mm to 20 mm) coupled to SiPMs from Hamamatsu. In this work we will use the developed MC tool to directly compare the highest possible time resolution for both the analog and digital readout of SiPMs with different scintillator lengths. The presented studies reveal that the analog readout of SiPMs with microcell signal pile-up and leading edge discrimination can lead to nearly the same time resolution as compared to the maximum likelihood time estimation applied to MD-SiPMs. Consequently there is no real preference for either a digital or analog SiPM for the sake of achieving highest time resolution. However, the best CTR in the analog SiPM is observed for a rather small range of optimal threshold values, whereas the MD-SiPM provides stable CTR after roughly 20 registered photoelectron timestamps in the time estimator.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1372504
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2015
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-13725042022-08-10T12:52:18Zdoi:10.1016/j.nima.2014.10.020http://cds.cern.ch/record/2162820engGundacker, SAuffray, EJarron, PMeyer, TLecoq, POn the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performanceDetectors and Experimental TechniquesIn time of flight positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) and in particular for the EndoTOFPET-US Project (Frisch, 2013 [1] ), and other applications for high energy physics, the multi-digital silicon photomultiplier (MD-SiPM) was recently proposed (Mandai and Charbon, 2012 [2] ), in which the time of every single photoelectron is being recorded. If such a photodetector is coupled to a scintillator, the largest and most accurate timing information can be extracted from the cascade of the scintillation photons, and the most probable time of positron emission determined. The readout concept of the MD-SiPM is very different from that of the analog SiPM, where the individual photoelectrons are merely summed up and the output signal fed into the readout electronics. We have developed a comprehensive Monte Carlo (MC) simulation tool that describes the timing properties of the photodetector and electronics, the scintillation properties of the crystal and the light transfer within the crystal. In previous studies we have compared MC simulations with coincidence time resolution (CTR) measurements and found good agreement within less than 10% for crystals of different lengths (from 3 mm to 20 mm) coupled to SiPMs from Hamamatsu. In this work we will use the developed MC tool to directly compare the highest possible time resolution for both the analog and digital readout of SiPMs with different scintillator lengths. The presented studies reveal that the analog readout of SiPMs with microcell signal pile-up and leading edge discrimination can lead to nearly the same time resolution as compared to the maximum likelihood time estimation applied to MD-SiPMs. Consequently there is no real preference for either a digital or analog SiPM for the sake of achieving highest time resolution. However, the best CTR in the analog SiPM is observed for a rather small range of optimal threshold values, whereas the MD-SiPM provides stable CTR after roughly 20 registered photoelectron timestamps in the time estimator.oai:inspirehep.net:13725042015
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Gundacker, S
Auffray, E
Jarron, P
Meyer, T
Lecoq, P
On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance
title On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance
title_full On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance
title_fullStr On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance
title_full_unstemmed On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance
title_short On the comparison of analog and digital SiPM readout in terms of expected timing performance
title_sort on the comparison of analog and digital sipm readout in terms of expected timing performance
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.10.020
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2162820
work_keys_str_mv AT gundackers onthecomparisonofanaloganddigitalsipmreadoutintermsofexpectedtimingperformance
AT auffraye onthecomparisonofanaloganddigitalsipmreadoutintermsofexpectedtimingperformance
AT jarronp onthecomparisonofanaloganddigitalsipmreadoutintermsofexpectedtimingperformance
AT meyert onthecomparisonofanaloganddigitalsipmreadoutintermsofexpectedtimingperformance
AT lecoqp onthecomparisonofanaloganddigitalsipmreadoutintermsofexpectedtimingperformance