Cargando…

Mechanical Performance of the LARP Nb$_3$Sn Quadrupole Magnet LQS01

As part of the effort towards the development of Nb$_3$Sn magnets for future LHC luminosity upgrades, the LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) has fabricated and tested the quadrupole magnet LQS01. The magnet implements 3.4 m long Nb$_3$Sn coils contained in a support structure characterized by a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferracin, P, Ambrosio, G, Anerella, M, Bingham, B, Bossert, R, Caspi, S, Cheng, D W, Chlachidze, G, Felice, H, Hafalia, A R, Mumper, W, Nobrega, F, Prestemon, S, Sabbi, G L, Schmalzle, J, Sylvester, C, Tartaglia, M, Wanderer, P, Zlobin, A V
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2010.2097571
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2773936
Descripción
Sumario:As part of the effort towards the development of Nb$_3$Sn magnets for future LHC luminosity upgrades, the LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) has fabricated and tested the quadrupole magnet LQS01. The magnet implements 3.4 m long Nb$_3$Sn coils contained in a support structure characterized by an external aluminum shell segmented in four sections. The room temperature pre-load of the structure is obtained by shimming load keys through bladders, pressurized during the loading operations and removed before cool-down. Temperature compensated strain gauges, mounted on structure components and coil poles, monitor the magnet's mechanical behavior during assembly, cool-down and, excitation. During the first test, LQS01 reached the target gradient of 200 T/m; the gauge data indicated that the aluminum shell was pre-tensioned to the target value estimated by numerical models, but a lack of pre-load was measured in the coil inner layer during ramping. As a result, the test was interrupted and the magnet disassembled, and inspected. A second test (LQS01b) was then carried out following a re-loading of the magnet. The paper reports on the strain gauge results of the first test and the analysis performed to identify corrective actions to improve the coil pre-stress distribution. The mechanical performance of the magnet during the second cool-down and test is then presented and discussed.